Response to Thirteen Cycles of Reciprocal Full Sib Recurrent Selection in the BS10 and BS11 Maize (Zea Mays L.) Populations PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Response to Thirteen Cycles of Reciprocal Full Sib Recurrent Selection in the BS10 and BS11 Maize (Zea Mays L.) Populations PDF full book. Access full book title Response to Thirteen Cycles of Reciprocal Full Sib Recurrent Selection in the BS10 and BS11 Maize (Zea Mays L.) Populations by Benjamin Aaron Ford. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Benjamin Aaron Ford Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 374
Book Description
Increases in grain yield, the primary trait for selection, include a direct response of 2.2 percent per cycle in the population cross, and indirect responses of 3.3 and 1.2 percent per cycle in BS10 and BS11, respectively, but only the response for BS11 fits a linear model. Linear trends through the first nine selection cycles, however, indicate a 4.6 percent per cycle increase for the population cross, as well as increases of 1.6 percent in BS10 and 1.6 percent in BS11 parent populations. Evaluations of random S1 line performance for BS10CO, BS10C13, BS11CO, and BS11C13 indicate decreasing trends in genetic variability over 13 cycles of FR. Exceptions are grain yield in BS10 and BS11 and plant height in BS11. While genetic variance estimates for grain yield are nearly equal for BS11CO and BS11C13, a nearly significant increase in variability is evident from BS10CO to BS10C13. Variability estimates suggest FR for grain yield in BS10 and BS11 will be effective in future selection cycles.
Author: Benjamin Aaron Ford Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 374
Book Description
Increases in grain yield, the primary trait for selection, include a direct response of 2.2 percent per cycle in the population cross, and indirect responses of 3.3 and 1.2 percent per cycle in BS10 and BS11, respectively, but only the response for BS11 fits a linear model. Linear trends through the first nine selection cycles, however, indicate a 4.6 percent per cycle increase for the population cross, as well as increases of 1.6 percent in BS10 and 1.6 percent in BS11 parent populations. Evaluations of random S1 line performance for BS10CO, BS10C13, BS11CO, and BS11C13 indicate decreasing trends in genetic variability over 13 cycles of FR. Exceptions are grain yield in BS10 and BS11 and plant height in BS11. While genetic variance estimates for grain yield are nearly equal for BS11CO and BS11C13, a nearly significant increase in variability is evident from BS10CO to BS10C13. Variability estimates suggest FR for grain yield in BS10 and BS11 will be effective in future selection cycles.
Author: T.M. Crosbie Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 186
Book Description
Several recurrent relection schemes are being used to improve grain-yield performance of several maize (Zea mays L.) populations at the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station. Three cycles of reciprocal full-sib selection in Iowa Two-ear Synthetic [BS10(FR)] and Pioneer Twc-ear Composite [BS11(FR)], seven cycels of reciprocal recurrent selection in Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic [BSSS(R)], Iowa Corn Borer Synthetic #1 [BSCB1(R)], and five cycels of half-sib recurrent selection in Lancaster Surecrop 9LANC) with maize inbred, Hy, as tester have been completed. I grew testcrosses of unimproved and improved populations of BS10(FR), BS11(FR), BSSS(R), BSCB1(R) And LANC, plus population crosses (i.e., CO X CO, CN X CN) of BS10(FR) X BS11(FR) and BSSS(R) X BSCB1(R) at three plant densities in three environments. Testers were maize inbreds Mo17, B77, and B79, My research was conducted: (1) to evaluate respones to plant densities of the CO and CN populations, (2) to study changes in several morphological and physiological traits associated with recurrent selection for increased grain yield, and (3) to caompare results obtained for testcrosses and populations crosses to evaluate combining ability for grain yield, density tolerance, and physiological traits. Reciprocal full-sib selection did not improve the response to plant densities of testcrosses and population crosses of BS10(FR) and BS11(FR). Furthermore, selection did not increase grain yield of BS10(FR) X BS11(FR) at 39.5 and 79.0 M plants/ha or of (...).
Author: M.A.B. Fakorede Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 326
Book Description
Dr. G. F. Sprague initiated recurrent selection programs during the 1940' and 1950' to improve the grain-yield performance of several maize (Zea mays L.) population at the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiments Station. Seven cycles of reciprocal recurrent selections (RRS) in Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) and Iowa Corn Borer Synthetic #1 (BSCB1), and six cycles of recurrent half-sib selection (HS) in the open-pollinated variety 'Alph'(i.e., BS12) have been completed. Inbred B14 was the tester in the HS program. My objectives were to (1) evaluate progress that resulted from the RRS and HS programs and (2) evaluate changes in several other traits associated with recurrent selection for grain yield. I evaluated the CO x CO, C5, and C7 x C7 of the RRS program, and CO and C6 of the HS program, each testcrossed to B14A. Estimated gain from seven cycles of RRS was 2.06 q/ha (or 5.21%) per cycle and observed difference in mean yield between CO and C6 of the program was 2.25 q/ha (or 6.00%) per cycle. Improved hybrids outyield their unimproved counterparts at all levels of nitrogen (0, 90, 180, and 270 kg N/ha) and plant density (39,000; 59,300; 79,000; and 98,800 plants/ha) investigated. Each hybrid displayed a positive, curvilinear response to nitrogen and a negative, linear response to plant density. Stability and adaptation-reaction analysis revealed that improved hybrids consistently demonstrated greater adaptation to high-nitrogen environments, but their unimproved counterparts did not take (...).
Author: Benjamin Aaron Ford
Author: Benjamin Aaron Ford
Author: Guillermo Hugo Eyherabide
Author: Iowa Academy of Science
Author: 
Author: 
Author: T.M. Crosbie
Author: 
Author: M.A.B. Fakorede
Author: Iowa State University
Author: