Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation PDF full book. Access full book title Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation by Wassila M'Sallaoui. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation

Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation PDF Author: Wassila M'Sallaoui
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Book Description
Background: Although short and long-term survival in critically ill cancer patients has been extensively studied, limited data exist concerning their quality of life (QoL) after a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to determine the impact of an ICU stay on QoL at 3 months in patients with solid cancer. Method: A prospective observational case-control study was conducted between February 2020 and February 2021 in three French ICUs. Surviving ICU patients with lung, colorectal, or head and neck cancer at 3 months after ICU discharge were matched with non-ICU cancer patients regarding the type of cancer, anticancer treatment goal (curative/palliative) and treatment line. QoL was assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey (ranging 0-100, higher values indicating better QoL) including mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) components. Anticancer treatment at 3 months was also assessed. Results: Twenty-three surviving ICU cancer patients were matched with 46 non-ICU cancer patients. All patients answered the survey except 4 patients in the ICU group. MCS was significantly higher in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients: median 54 (interquartile range [IQR] 42-57) versus 47 (IQR 37-52), respectively (P = 0.01). PCS was not different between these 2 groups: 35 (IQR 31-47) vs 42 (IQR 34-47) (P = 0.24). The multivariate analysis showed no significative association between ICU/non-ICU status of patients and the quality-of-life scores (MCS or PCS) 3 months after discharge. Therapeutic strategy at 3 months according to anticancer treatment was similar between the 2 groups. A good Performance Status (PS) (Coef 1.46, CI95% 1.11-1.90, p-value 0.01) and the non-metastatic status of the cancer (Coef 1.21, CI95% 1.05-1.40, p-value 0.01) were independently associated with a higher PCS. Conclusion: At three months, cancer patients admitted in ICU had comparable QoL to matched patients not admitted in ICU. Thus, the challenge is to identify patients with good prognostic factors who would benefit from an ICU stay in terms of QoL and continue their anticancer treatments. These results require confirmation by a multicenter study.

Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation

Qualité de Vie Des Patients Atteints de Cancer À 3 Mois D'un Séjour en Réanimation PDF Author: Wassila M'Sallaoui
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Book Description
Background: Although short and long-term survival in critically ill cancer patients has been extensively studied, limited data exist concerning their quality of life (QoL) after a stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). We sought to determine the impact of an ICU stay on QoL at 3 months in patients with solid cancer. Method: A prospective observational case-control study was conducted between February 2020 and February 2021 in three French ICUs. Surviving ICU patients with lung, colorectal, or head and neck cancer at 3 months after ICU discharge were matched with non-ICU cancer patients regarding the type of cancer, anticancer treatment goal (curative/palliative) and treatment line. QoL was assessed using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey (ranging 0-100, higher values indicating better QoL) including mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) components. Anticancer treatment at 3 months was also assessed. Results: Twenty-three surviving ICU cancer patients were matched with 46 non-ICU cancer patients. All patients answered the survey except 4 patients in the ICU group. MCS was significantly higher in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients: median 54 (interquartile range [IQR] 42-57) versus 47 (IQR 37-52), respectively (P = 0.01). PCS was not different between these 2 groups: 35 (IQR 31-47) vs 42 (IQR 34-47) (P = 0.24). The multivariate analysis showed no significative association between ICU/non-ICU status of patients and the quality-of-life scores (MCS or PCS) 3 months after discharge. Therapeutic strategy at 3 months according to anticancer treatment was similar between the 2 groups. A good Performance Status (PS) (Coef 1.46, CI95% 1.11-1.90, p-value 0.01) and the non-metastatic status of the cancer (Coef 1.21, CI95% 1.05-1.40, p-value 0.01) were independently associated with a higher PCS. Conclusion: At three months, cancer patients admitted in ICU had comparable QoL to matched patients not admitted in ICU. Thus, the challenge is to identify patients with good prognostic factors who would benefit from an ICU stay in terms of QoL and continue their anticancer treatments. These results require confirmation by a multicenter study.

Managing Epidemics

Managing Epidemics PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789240698345
Category : MEDICAL
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description


Collaboration with Parents of Exceptional Children

Collaboration with Parents of Exceptional Children PDF Author: Marvin J. Fine
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Family & Relationships
Languages : en
Pages : 376

Book Description


The Qualities of Mothering

The Qualities of Mothering PDF Author: Michael Rutter
Publisher: Jason Aronson
ISBN:
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 184

Book Description