Author: United States. Supreme CourtPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Book Description
Power of the President to Remove Federal Officers
Author: United States. Supreme CourtPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Book Description
The President's Removal Power Under the Constitution
Author: Edward Samuel CorwinPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 96
Book Description
Power of the President to Remove Federal Officers
Author: Removal from Office
Author: United States. Department of JusticePublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 100
Book Description
Power of the President to Remove Federal Officers
Author: Power of the President to Remove Federal Officers: Opinions and Dissenting Opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
Author: United StatesPower of the President to Remove Federal Officers, Opinions and Dissenting Opinions of the Supreme Court of the U.S...
Author: The President and Immigration Law
Author: Adam B. CoxPublisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0190694386
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 361
Book Description
Who controls American immigration policy? The biggest immigration controversies of the last decade have all involved policies produced by the President policies such as President Obama's decision to protect Dreamers from deportation and President Trump's proclamation banning immigrants from several majority-Muslim nations. While critics of these policies have been separated by a vast ideological chasm, their broadsides have embodied the same widely shared belief: that Congress, not the President, ought to dictate who may come to the United States and who will be forced to leave. This belief is a myth. In The President and Immigration Law, Adam B. Cox and Cristina M. RodrÃguez chronicle the untold story of how, over the course of two centuries, the President became our immigration policymaker-in-chief. Diving deep into the history of American immigration policy from founding-era disputes over deporting sympathizers with France to contemporary debates about asylum-seekers at the Southern border they show how migration crises, real or imagined, have empowered presidents. Far more importantly, they also uncover how the Executive's ordinary power to decide when to enforce the law, and against whom, has become an extraordinarily powerful vehicle for making immigration policy. This pathbreaking account helps us understand how the United States ?has come to run an enormous shadow immigration system-one in which nearly half of all noncitizens in the country are living in violation of the law. It also provides a blueprint for reform, one that accepts rather than laments the role the President plays in shaping the national community, while also outlining strategies to curb the abuse of law enforcement authority in immigration and beyond.
Speech of Mr. Barton, of Missouri, Upon the Power of the President to Remove Federal Officers
Author: David BartonPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Executive power
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
The Specter of Dictatorship
Author: David M. DriesenPublisher: Stanford University Press
ISBN: 1503628620
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 323
Book Description
Reveals how the U.S. Supreme Court's presidentialism threatens our democracy and what to do about it. Donald Trump's presidency made many Americans wonder whether our system of checks and balances would prove robust enough to withstand an onslaught from a despotic chief executive. In The Specter of Dictatorship, David Driesen analyzes the chief executive's role in the democratic decline of Hungary, Poland, and Turkey and argues that an insufficiently constrained presidency is one of the most important systemic threats to democracy. Driesen urges the U.S. to learn from the mistakes of these failing democracies. Their experiences suggest, Driesen shows, that the Court must eschew its reliance on and expansion of the "unitary executive theory" recently endorsed by the Court and apply a less deferential approach to presidential authority, invoked to protect national security and combat emergencies, than it has in recent years. Ultimately, Driesen argues that concern about loss of democracy should play a major role in the Court's jurisprudence, because loss of democracy can prove irreversible. As autocracy spreads throughout the world, maintaining our democracy has become an urgent matter.