Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation PDF full book. Access full book title Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation

Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 12

Book Description
This report identifies and documents the most appropriate bagless transfer can size to support Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading operations. Also, this report considers can diameter, can wall thickness, and can length.

Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation

Plutonium Immobilization Bagless Transfer Can Size Evaluation PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 12

Book Description
This report identifies and documents the most appropriate bagless transfer can size to support Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading operations. Also, this report considers can diameter, can wall thickness, and can length.

Plutonium Immobilization Project Comparison of Bagless Transfer and Electrolytic Decon

Plutonium Immobilization Project Comparison of Bagless Transfer and Electrolytic Decon PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 5

Book Description
This report documents a study requested for PIP to compare the baseline bagless transfer process with the electrolytic decontamination process, and recommend the process for the PIP application. Two different methods of packaging pucks in cans for the Plutonium Immobilization Project (PIP) were compared; the SRS bagless transfer and electrolytic decontamination. The SRS bagless transfer generates more waste, but it is simpler, less systems would be required, it requires much less glovebox space, much less building space and the installed cost would be considerably less. Therefore, the SRS bagless transfer is recommended for the PIP.

Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading Concepts

Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading Concepts PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 12

Book Description
The Plutonium Immobilization Facility will encapsulate plutonium in ceramic pucks and seal the pucks inside welded cans. Remote equipment will place these cans in magazines and the magazines in a Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister. The DWPF will fill the canister with glass for permanent storage. This report discusses five can loading conceptual designs and the lists the advantages and disadvantages for each concept. This report identifies loading pucks into cans and backfilling cans with helium as the top priority can loading development areas. The can loading welder and cutter are very similar to the existing Savannah River Site (SRS) FB-Line bagless transfer welder and cutter and thus they are a low priority development item.

Plutonium Immobilization Form Evaluation

Plutonium Immobilization Form Evaluation PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 24

Book Description
The 1994 National Academy of Sciences study and the 1997 assessment by DOE's Office of Nonproliferation and National Security have emphasized the importance of the overall objectives of the Plutonium Disposition Program of beginning disposition rapidly. President Clinton and other leaders of the G-7 plus one ('Political Eight') group of states, at the Moscow Nuclear Safety And Security Summit in April 1996, agreed on the objectives of accomplishing disposition of excess fissile material as soon as practicable. To meet these objectives, DOE has laid out an aggressive schedule in which large-scale immobilization operations would begin in 2005. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL), the lead laboratory for the development of Pu immobilization technologies for the Department of Energy's Office of Fissile Materials Disposition (MD), was requested by MD to recommend the preferred immobilization form and technology for the disposition of excess weapons-usable Pu. In a series of three separate evaluations, the technologies for the candidate glass and ceramic forms were compared against criteria and metrics that reflect programmatic and technical objectives: (1) Evaluation of the R & D and engineering data for the two forms against the decision criteria/metrics by a technical evaluation panel comprising experts from within the immobilization program. (2) Integrated assessment by LLNL immobilization management of the candidate technologies with respect to the weighted criteria and other programmatic objectives, leading to a recommendation to DOE/MD on the preferred technology based on technical factors. (3) Assessment of the decision process, evaluation, and recommendation by a peer review panel of independent experts. Criteria used to assess the relative merits of the immobilization technologies were a subset of the criteria previously used by MD to choose among disposition options leading to the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons-Usable Fissile Materials, January 1997. Criteria were: (1) resistance to Pu theft, diversion, and recovery by a terrorist organization or rogue nation; (2) resistance to recovery and reuse by host nation; (3) technical viability, including technical maturity, development risk, and acceptability for repository disposal; (4) environmental, safety, and health factors; (5) cost effectiveness; and (6) timeliness. On the basis of the technical evaluation and assessments, in September, 1997, LLNL recommended to DOE/MD that ceramic technologies be developed for deployment in the planned Pu immobilization plant.

Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading FY98 Year End Design Report

Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading FY98 Year End Design Report PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
The Plutonium Immobilization Facility will immobilize plutonium in ceramic pucks and seal the pucks inside welded cans. Remote equipment will place these cans in magazines and the magazines in a Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) canister. The DWPF will fill the canister with glass for permanent storage. This report summarizes FY98 Can Loading work completed for the Plutonium Immobilization Project and it includes summaries of reports on Can Size, Equipment Review, Preliminary Concepts, Conceptual Design, and Preliminary Specification. Plant trip reports for the Greenville Automation and Manufacturing Exposition, Rocky Flats BNFL Pu repackaging glovebox line, and vendor trips are also included.

Material Transfer System in Support of the Plutonium Immobilization Program

Material Transfer System in Support of the Plutonium Immobilization Program PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
The Plutonium Immobilization Program requires development of the process and plant prototypic equipment to immobilize surplus plutonium in ceramic for long-term storage. Because of the hazardous nature of plutonium, it was necessary to develop a remotely operable materials transfer system which can function within the confines of a glovebox. In support of this work at LLNL, such a material transfer system (MTS) was developed. This paper presents both the mechanical and controls parts making up this system, and includes photographs of the key components and diagrams of their assemblies, as well as a description of the control sequence used to validate the MTS capabilities.

Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading Equipment Review

Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading Equipment Review PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18

Book Description
This report lists the operations required to complete the Can Loading steps on the Pu Immobilization Plant Flow Sheets and evaluates the equipment options to complete each operation. This report recommends the most appropriate equipment to support Plutonium Immobilization Can Loading operations.

Plutonium Immobilization Project Concept for Dustless Transfer of Powder

Plutonium Immobilization Project Concept for Dustless Transfer of Powder PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 5

Book Description
Plutonium powder will be brought into the Plutonium Immobilization Plant in Food Pack Cans in 3013 packages. The Food Pack Cans will be removed from the 3013 outer and inner can. This document describes their concept and completes PIP milestone 2.2.3.4/FY01/c, Complete Concept for Material Transfer.

An Analysis of Plutonium Immobilization Versus the "spent Fuel" Standard

An Analysis of Plutonium Immobilization Versus the Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Book Description
Safe Pu management is an important and urgent task with profound environmental, national, and international security implications. Presidential Policy Directive 13 and analyses by scientific, technical, and international policy organizations brought about a focused effort within the Department of Energy (DOE) to identify and implement long-term disposition paths for surplus Pu. The principal goal is to render surplus Pu as inaccessible and unattractive for reuse in nuclear weapons as Pu in spent reactor fuel. In the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement and Record of Decision for the Storage and Disposition of Weapons- Usable Fissile Materials (1997), DOE announced pursuit of two disposition technologies: (1) irradiation of Pu as MOX fuel in existing reactors and (2) immobilization of Pu into solid forms containing fission products as a radiation barrier. DOE chose an immobilization approach that includes use of the can-in-canister option. . for a portion of the surplus, non-pit Pu material. In the can-in-canister approach, cans of glass or ceramic forms containing Pu are encapsulated within canisters of HLW glass. In support of the selection process, a technical evaluation of retrievability and recoverability of Pu from glass and ceramic forms by a host nation and by rogue nations or subnational groups was completed. The evaluation involved determining processes and flowsheets for Pu recovery, comparing these processes against criteria and metrics established by the Fissile Materials Disposition Program and then comparing the recovery processes against each other and against SNF processes.

Proceedings of the Embedded Topical Meeting on DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Material Management, San Diego, California, June 4-8, 2000

Proceedings of the Embedded Topical Meeting on DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Material Management, San Diego, California, June 4-8, 2000 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 556

Book Description