Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the JudiciaryPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Perjury
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Book Description
Considers (81) S. 933.
Perjury (contradictory Statements Under Oath)
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the JudiciaryPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Perjury
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Book Description
Considers (81) S. 933.
Law of Perjury
Author: K. M. SharmaPublisher:
ISBN: 9789385444302
Category : Perjury
Languages : en
Pages : 348
Book Description
Perjury (contradictory Statements Under Oath)
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the JudiciaryPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Perjury
Languages : en
Pages : 10
Book Description
Perjury (contradictory Statements Under Oath)
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the JudiciaryPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Labor unions
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Book Description
Perjury hearing before a subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Eighty-first Congress, second session, on S. 933, to extend the law relating to perjury to the willful giving of contradictory statements under oath
Author: Report and Recommendations on Perjury
Author: New York (State). Commission on the Administration of JusticePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Justice, Administration of
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Book Description
Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands
Author: Philippines. Supreme CourtPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 1318
Book Description
Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands from ...
Author: Philippines. Supreme CourtPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 1320
Book Description
Perjury Under Federal Law
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
In most cases, the courts abbreviate their description of the elements and state that to prove perjury under Section 1623 the government must establish that the defendant "(1) knowingly made a (2) false (3) material declaration (4) under oath (5) in a proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States." The courts generally favor the encapsulation from United States v. [...] On the civil side, the lower federal courts appear divided between the view (1) that a statement in a deposition is material if a "truthful answer might reasonably be calculated to lead to the discovery of evidence admissible at the trial of the underlying suit" and (2) that a statement is material "if the topic of the statement is discoverable and the false statement itself had a tendency to affe [...] Moreover, the statements must be so inherently contradictory that one of them of necessity must be false.34 Some years ago, the Supreme Court declined to reverse an earlier ruling that "[t]he general rule in prosecutions for perjury is that the uncorroborated oath of one witness is not enough to establish the falsity of the testimony of the accused set forth in the indictment."35. [...] The defense is stated in fairly straightforward terms, "[w]here in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if - (1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and (2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of l [...] It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true"); United States v. Dunn, 442 U. S.100, 108 (1979)("By relieving the government of the burden of proving which of two or more inconsistent declarations was false, see ยง1623(c), Congress sought to affor.
Organized Crime Control
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee No. 5Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Crime
Languages : en
Pages : 1552
Book Description