Author: Darvish BahiraeiPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 290
Book Description
The Validation of Peer Assessment Rating Index by Western Pennsylvania Orthodontists
Validity of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index Utilizing Serial Study Models of Untreated Subjects
Author: David E. WalkerPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Malocclusion
Languages : en
Pages : 118
Book Description
The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR)
Author: Eric D. HannapelPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Malocclusion
Languages : en
Pages : 258
Book Description
An Investigation Into the Validity of the Par Index (peer Assessment Rating)
Author: Ahmad Mohammad HamdanA Comparison of the Peer Assessment Rating Index Scores Generated from Plaster Models and Scores Generated from Digital Models of the Same Patients
Author: Matthew Christopher MayersPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 58
Book Description
Validity and Reliability of Peer Assessment Rating Index Scores of Digital and Plaster Models
Author: Curtis Kyo-shin AndrewsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Diagnostic imaging
Languages : en
Pages : 41
Book Description
Abstract: Introduction: The object of this research was to evaluate the reliability and validity of Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index scores derived from computerized digital models. Computer based digital orthodontic models have been shown to be valid and reliable when making measurements of tooth size and simple diagnoses of dental malocclusions. The validity and reliability of PAR scores from digital models and plaster models that have been previously scored and standardized for a calibration exercise for the PAR index have not been established. Methods: Ten examiners were trained to score digital and plaster models using the PAR index. Thirty standardized and previously scored plaster PAR models used in PAR calibration were digitized using digital study model technology. The plaster and digital calibration models were randomized and scored by the ten examiners. All measurements were repeated by all examiners at a second session. Results: Plaster and digital scores were compared to the gold standard PAR scores for validity. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) for plaster models ranged from 0.808-0.926. The mean ICC for plaster models was 0.891 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.829-0.940. The ICCs for digital models ranged from 0.846-0.922. The mean ICC for digital models was 0.878 with CI of 0.811-0.931. Intra-rater reliability was excellent for plaster (ICC =0.919) and for digital models (ICC= 0.905). Inter-rater reliability was also good for plaster (ICC=0.912) and digital models (ICC=0.883). Conclusions: The PAR index scores obtained from the digital and plaster calibration models were shown to be valid and reliable.
Orthodontic Outcomes Assessment Using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index
Author: Renee Allen DykenAssessment of the Peer Assessment Rating Index as Applied to the Malocclusions of Subjects with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
Author: Mark Phillip RarrickPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 234
Book Description
Adaptation of the Peer Assessment Rating Index Weights to Australian Conditions
Author: Emily Ruth ClosePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Occlusion (Dentistry)
Languages : en
Pages : 130
Book Description
Author: 許展維