Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics PDF full book. Access full book title Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics by John G. Bullock. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: John G. Bullock Publisher: ISBN: Category : Economics Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Partisanship seems to affect factual beliefs about politics. For example, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say that the deficit rose during the Clinton administration; Democrats are more likely to say that inflation rose under Reagan. We investigate whether such patterns reflect differing beliefs among partisans or instead reflect a desire to praise one party or criticize another. We develop a model of partisan survey response and report two experiments that are based on the model. The experiments show that small payments for correct and "don't know" responses sharply diminish the gap between Democrats and Republicans in responses to "partisan" factual questions. The results suggest that the apparent differences in factual beliefs between members of different parties may be more illusory than real.
Author: John G. Bullock Publisher: ISBN: Category : Economics Languages : en Pages : 0
Book Description
Partisanship seems to affect factual beliefs about politics. For example, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say that the deficit rose during the Clinton administration; Democrats are more likely to say that inflation rose under Reagan. We investigate whether such patterns reflect differing beliefs among partisans or instead reflect a desire to praise one party or criticize another. We develop a model of partisan survey response and report two experiments that are based on the model. The experiments show that small payments for correct and "don't know" responses sharply diminish the gap between Democrats and Republicans in responses to "partisan" factual questions. The results suggest that the apparent differences in factual beliefs between members of different parties may be more illusory than real.
Author: John G. Bullock Publisher: ISBN: Category : Economics Languages : en Pages : 78
Book Description
Partisanship seems to affect factual beliefs about politics. For example, Republicans are more likely than Democrats to say that the deficit rose during the Clinton administration; Democrats are more likely to say that inflation rose under Reagan. We investigate whether such patterns reflect differing beliefs among partisans or instead reflect a desire to praise one party or criticize another. We develop a model of partisan survey response and report two experiments that are based on the model. The experiments show that small payments for correct and "don't know" responses sharply diminish the gap between Democrats and Republicans in responses to "partisan" factual questions. The results suggest that the apparent differences in factual beliefs between members of different parties may be more illusory than real.
Author: Si Sheppard Publisher: McFarland ISBN: 0786432829 Category : Language Arts & Disciplines Languages : en Pages : 385
Book Description
This book is the first to place the contemporary debate over media bias in historical context, illustrating how partisan bias in the American media has built political parties, set the stage for several wars, and even contributed to the rise and fall of U.S. presidents. The author discusses the rise of the unprecedented post-World War II model of objective journalism and explains why this model is breaking down under the challenge of a new generation of technology-driven partisan media alternatives.
Author: Elizabeth Suhay Publisher: Oxford University Press ISBN: 0190860839 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 912
Book Description
Elections are the means by which democratic nations determine their leaders, and communication in the context of elections has the potential to shape people's beliefs, attitudes, and actions. Thus, electoral persuasion is one of the most important political processes in any nation that regularly holds elections. Moreover, electoral persuasion encompasses not only what happens in an election but also what happens before and after, involving candidates, parties, interest groups, the media, and the voters themselves. This volume surveys the vast political science literature on this subject, emphasizing contemporary research and topics and encouraging cross-fertilization among research strands. A global roster of authors provides a broad examination of electoral persuasion, with international perspectives complementing deep coverage of U.S. politics. Major areas of coverage include: general models of political persuasion; persuasion by parties, candidates, and outside groups; media influence; interpersonal influence; electoral persuasion across contexts; and empirical methodologies for understanding electoral persuasion.
Author: Nathan Lee Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
One of the consequences of political polarization in American today is that Democrats and Republicans not only disagree with each other on matters of values but also on matters of fact. With the growing concerns over fake news, social media echo chambers, and a decline in trust in experts, some have gone so far as to label our current discourse as "post-truth." However, most systematic evidence on these phenomena are drawn from studies of the mass public. We know very little about the extent to which this description extends to policymakers. One the one hand, elected officials tend to be committed partisans; consequently, we might expect policymakers to be especially prone to partisan biases in the processing of information. On the other hand, policymakers have the responsibility of making real decisions that affect the welfare of real people, potentially moderating these biases. In three studies, I adopt a range of empirical strategies to investigate these competing predictions. By (1) comparing the factual beliefs of policymakers and the public, (2) assessing policymaker responsiveness to expert evidence, and (3) analyzing who testifies on climate change in Congress, I present new evidence which challenges the dire predictions that follow from applying behavioral theories of partisan bias to policymaking.
Author: Morgan Marietta Publisher: Oxford University Press ISBN: 0190677198 Category : Psychology Languages : en Pages : 309
Book Description
The deep divides that define politics in the United States are not restricted to policy or even cultural differences anymore. Americans no longer agree on basic questions of fact. Is climate change real? Does racism still determine who gets ahead? Is sexual orientation innate? Do immigration and free trade help or hurt the economy? Does gun control reduce violence? Are false convictions common? Employing several years of original survey data and experiments, Marietta and Barker reach a number of enlightening and provocative conclusions: dueling fact perceptions are not so much a product of hyper-partisanship or media propaganda as they are of simple value differences and deepening distrust of authorities. These duels foster social contempt, even in the workplace, and they warp the electorate. The educated -- on both the right and the left -- carry the biggest guns and are the quickest to draw. And finally, fact-checking and other proposed remedies don't seem to holster too many weapons; they can even add bullets to the chamber. Marietta and Barker's pessimistic conclusions will challenge idealistic reformers.
Author: Lilliana Mason Publisher: University of Chicago Press ISBN: 022652468X Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 193
Book Description
The psychology behind political partisanship: “The kind of research that will change not just how you think about the world but how you think about yourself.” —Ezra Klein, Vox Political polarization in America has moved beyond disagreements about matters of policy. For the first time in decades, research has shown that members of both parties hold strongly unfavorable views of their opponents. This is polarization rooted in social identity, and it is growing. The campaign and election of Donald Trump laid bare this fact of the American electorate, its successful rhetoric of “us versus them” tapping into a powerful current of anger and resentment. With Uncivil Agreement, Lilliana Mason looks at the growing social gulf across racial, religious, and cultural lines, which have recently come to divide neatly between the two major political parties. She argues that group identifications have changed the way we think and feel about ourselves and our opponents. Even when Democrats and Republicans can agree on policy outcomes, they tend to view one other with distrust and to work for party victory over all else. Although the polarizing effects of social divisions have simplified our electoral choices and increased political engagement, they have not been a force that is, on balance, helpful for American democracy. Bringing together theory from political science and social psychology, Uncivil Agreement clearly describes this increasingly “social” type of polarization, and adds much to our understanding of contemporary politics.
Author: Rainer Greifeneder Publisher: Routledge ISBN: 1000179052 Category : Language Arts & Disciplines Languages : en Pages : 222
Book Description
This volume examines the phenomenon of fake news by bringing together leading experts from different fields within psychology and related areas, and explores what has become a prominent feature of public discourse since the first Brexit referendum and the 2016 US election campaign. Dealing with misinformation is important in many areas of daily life, including politics, the marketplace, health communication, journalism, education, and science. In a general climate where facts and misinformation blur, and are intentionally blurred, this book asks what determines whether people accept and share (mis)information, and what can be done to counter misinformation? All three of these aspects need to be understood in the context of online social networks, which have fundamentally changed the way information is produced, consumed, and transmitted. The contributions within this volume summarize the most up-to-date empirical findings, theories, and applications and discuss cutting-edge ideas and future directions of interventions to counter fake news. Also providing guidance on how to handle misinformation in an age of “alternative facts”, this is a fascinating and vital reading for students and academics in psychology, communication, and political science and for professionals including policy makers and journalists.
Author: John G. Bullock
Author: John G. Bullock
Author: John G. Bullock
Author: 
Author: Si Sheppard
Author: Elizabeth Suhay
Author: Nathan Lee
Author: Morgan Marietta
Author: Lilliana Mason
Author: Rainer Greifeneder
Author: Nathaniel Persily