Northern Arizona University Alumni Association & Office of Alumni Relations Annual Report, July 2001-July 2002 PDF Download

Author: NAU Alumni Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18

View

Book Description

Author: Northern Arizona University. Office of Alumni Relations
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description

Author: NAU Alumni Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 394

View

Book Description

Author: Atomic Energy Research Establishment (Harwell, England). Education and Training Centre
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 42

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780837969916
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 2946

View

Book Description

Author: Marquis Who's Who, Inc
Publisher: Marquis Who's Who
ISBN: 9780837969664
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 3000

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 124

View

Book Description

Author: Peter Hunn
Publisher: McGraw Hill Professional
ISBN: 0071811028
Category : Sports & Recreation
Languages : en
Pages : 320

View

Book Description
"Incredible amount of detail about all those kickers from the past, including an appendix with comprehensive model-year information." WoodenBoat "This book is the one to buy if you are interested in collecting antique outboard motors." Boating

Author: Marquis Who's Who
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780837909387
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 850

View

Book Description

Author: Bre Lynn Myers
Publisher: Plural Publishing
ISBN: 9781597564113
Category : Patients
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
In Seeing Things, Robert Hudson assesses a common way of arguing about observation reports called "robustness reasoning." Robustness reasoning claims that an observation report is more likely to be true if the report is produced by multiple, independent sources. Seeing Things argues that robustness reasoning lacks the special value it is often claimed to have. Hudson exposes key flaws in various popular philosophical defenses of robustness reasoning. This philosophical critique of robustness is extended by recounting five episodes in the history of science (from experimental microbiology, atomic theory, astrophysics and astronomy) where robustness reasoning is - or could be claimed to have been - used. Hudson goes on to show that none of these episodes do in fact exhibit robustness reasoning. In this way, the significance of robustness reasoning is rebutted on both philosophical and historical grounds. But the book does more than critique robustness reasoning. It also develops a better defense of the informative value of observation reports. The book concludes by relating insights into the failure of robustness reasoning to a popular approach to scientific realism called "(theoretical) preservationism." Hudson argues that those who defend this approach to realism commit similar errors to those who advocate robustness reasoning. In turn, a new form of realism is formulated and defended. Called "methodological preservationism," it recognizes the fundamental value of naked eye observation to scientists - and the rest of us.