Author: Frederick R. Anderson
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1135997780
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 345
Book Description
This book examines the courts' interpretation of NEPA in its first three years, defeats and successes of citizens' actions in key cases, and implication of court rulings for the act's future effectiveness. Originally published in 1973
NEPA in the Courts
Author: Frederick R. Anderson
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1135997780
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 345
Book Description
This book examines the courts' interpretation of NEPA in its first three years, defeats and successes of citizens' actions in key cases, and implication of court rulings for the act's future effectiveness. Originally published in 1973
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1135997780
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 345
Book Description
This book examines the courts' interpretation of NEPA in its first three years, defeats and successes of citizens' actions in key cases, and implication of court rulings for the act's future effectiveness. Originally published in 1973
N.E.P.A. in the Courts
Author: Frederick R. Anderson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 324
Book Description
Scherr V. Volpe
The NEPA Litigation Guide
Author: Albert M. Ferlo
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781614385165
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) introduced the environmental impact statement, transformed decision making by federal agencies, and spurred the growth of an extensive body of environmental law. This book takes a close look at the litigation of NEPA cases, including jurisdiction and related issues, standard and scope of judicial review, and the specific concerns of litigators. It identifies key NEPA issues and offers solutions to the challenges faced in practice, including climate change and its relationship to the NEPA process.
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781614385165
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) introduced the environmental impact statement, transformed decision making by federal agencies, and spurred the growth of an extensive body of environmental law. This book takes a close look at the litigation of NEPA cases, including jurisdiction and related issues, standard and scope of judicial review, and the specific concerns of litigators. It identifies key NEPA issues and offers solutions to the challenges faced in practice, including climate change and its relationship to the NEPA process.
Examination of Courts' Interpretations of NEPA
Author: Nai-Yu Wang
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 202
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 202
Book Description
NEPA Law and Litigation
Author: Daniel R. Mandelker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 1136
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 1136
Book Description
The NEPA Litigation Guide
Author: Mark Squillace
Publisher: Section of Litigation
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 386
Book Description
Publisher: Section of Litigation
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 386
Book Description
Damage Done? The Status of NEPA after Winter v. NRDC and Answers to Lingering Questions Left Open by the Court
Author: William S. Eubanks
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 22
Book Description
In November 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. (2008). At issue in the case were many questions regarding the use of naval sonar and the impacts of that use on marine mammals such as whales and dolphins. The environmental plaintiffs alleged that the Navy violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by conducting training exercises without first fully considering the environmental impact of the exercises as required by NEPA. The Court issued an expedited opinion, deciding the case very narrowly on equitable balancing grounds under the unique facts of the case. This narrow decision by the Court left many important legal questions unanswered. This article provides post-Winter guidance to federal courts addressing issues under NEPA where the Supreme Court has not definitively spoken. Specifically, the first portion of this article dissects the Court's irreparable harm analysis in Winter and predicts the effect this standard will have in future NEPA cases. The second portion of this article answers three critical NEPA questions left open by the Winter Court's narrow decision. This section thoroughly analyzes court decisions and other relevant information to provide rational and detailed resolution to these questions in an effort to assist courts confronted with these issues in the future.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 22
Book Description
In November 2008, the United States Supreme Court decided Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. (2008). At issue in the case were many questions regarding the use of naval sonar and the impacts of that use on marine mammals such as whales and dolphins. The environmental plaintiffs alleged that the Navy violated the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) by conducting training exercises without first fully considering the environmental impact of the exercises as required by NEPA. The Court issued an expedited opinion, deciding the case very narrowly on equitable balancing grounds under the unique facts of the case. This narrow decision by the Court left many important legal questions unanswered. This article provides post-Winter guidance to federal courts addressing issues under NEPA where the Supreme Court has not definitively spoken. Specifically, the first portion of this article dissects the Court's irreparable harm analysis in Winter and predicts the effect this standard will have in future NEPA cases. The second portion of this article answers three critical NEPA questions left open by the Winter Court's narrow decision. This section thoroughly analyzes court decisions and other relevant information to provide rational and detailed resolution to these questions in an effort to assist courts confronted with these issues in the future.
NEPA in the court ...
The National Environmental Policy Act
Author: Lynton Keith Caldwell
Publisher: Indiana University Press
ISBN: 0253028469
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 233
Book Description
"The National Environmental Policy Act has grown more, not less, important in the decades since its enactment. No one knows more about NEPA than Lynton Caldwell. And no one has a clearer vision of its relevance to our future. Highly recommended." —David W. Orr, Oberlin College What has been achieved since the National Environmental Policy Act was passed in 1969? This book points out where and how NEPA has affected national environmental policy and where and why its intent has been frustrated. The roles of Congress, the President, and the courts in the implementation of NEPA are analyzed. Professor Caldwell also looks at the conflicted state of public opinion regarding the environment and conjectures as to what must be done in order to develop a coherent and sustained policy.
Publisher: Indiana University Press
ISBN: 0253028469
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 233
Book Description
"The National Environmental Policy Act has grown more, not less, important in the decades since its enactment. No one knows more about NEPA than Lynton Caldwell. And no one has a clearer vision of its relevance to our future. Highly recommended." —David W. Orr, Oberlin College What has been achieved since the National Environmental Policy Act was passed in 1969? This book points out where and how NEPA has affected national environmental policy and where and why its intent has been frustrated. The roles of Congress, the President, and the courts in the implementation of NEPA are analyzed. Professor Caldwell also looks at the conflicted state of public opinion regarding the environment and conjectures as to what must be done in order to develop a coherent and sustained policy.