Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method PDF full book. Access full book title Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method by Scherz M.. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method PDF Author: Scherz M.
Publisher: Infinite Study
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 10

Book Description
Capturing uncertainty in multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is not a new theme but a largely developing topic which is in close connection with uncertainty theories such as fuzzy set and grey systems theories. Due to growing complexity of construction processes mainly because of implementation of sustainability aspects it would be necessary to take advantage of a novel MCDA methodology as an efficient tool to handle the uncertainty in sustainable construction decision making. In this study, we utilise a novel neutrosophic modified best-worst method (NM-BWM) to deal with the uncertainty in decision making in the context of sustainable construction. The method is an integration of neutrosophic set theory (NST) and the modified best-worst method (M-BWM). The NST can provide insights on efficient uncertainty handling of decision makers (DMs) subjective judgements. The BWM is a MCDA method which utilises two vectors of pairwise comparisons (the best criterion to others and others to the worst criterion) to obtain the weights of evaluation criteria. Merits of the BWM include its capability in effectively remedying the inconsistency derived from pairwise comparisons as well as simplicity and less pairwise comparisons compared to other similar methods like analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We show the applicability of the method in a case study with focus on the implementation of sustainable construction.

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method

Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis under uncertainty in sustainable construction: a neutrosophic modified best-worst method PDF Author: Scherz M.
Publisher: Infinite Study
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 10

Book Description
Capturing uncertainty in multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is not a new theme but a largely developing topic which is in close connection with uncertainty theories such as fuzzy set and grey systems theories. Due to growing complexity of construction processes mainly because of implementation of sustainability aspects it would be necessary to take advantage of a novel MCDA methodology as an efficient tool to handle the uncertainty in sustainable construction decision making. In this study, we utilise a novel neutrosophic modified best-worst method (NM-BWM) to deal with the uncertainty in decision making in the context of sustainable construction. The method is an integration of neutrosophic set theory (NST) and the modified best-worst method (M-BWM). The NST can provide insights on efficient uncertainty handling of decision makers (DMs) subjective judgements. The BWM is a MCDA method which utilises two vectors of pairwise comparisons (the best criterion to others and others to the worst criterion) to obtain the weights of evaluation criteria. Merits of the BWM include its capability in effectively remedying the inconsistency derived from pairwise comparisons as well as simplicity and less pairwise comparisons compared to other similar methods like analytic hierarchy process (AHP). We show the applicability of the method in a case study with focus on the implementation of sustainable construction.

Comparison of Plithogenic and Neutrosophic Approaches in Decision Making via Best-Worst Method

Comparison of Plithogenic and Neutrosophic Approaches in Decision Making via Best-Worst Method PDF Author: S. Sudha
Publisher: Infinite Study
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 14

Book Description
Decision making is a comprehensive process comprising of uncertainties that shall be handled with the right selection of decision making approaches. Selection of the optimal alternatives and the best criteria is the expected outcome of any decision making strategy. This paper proposes a decision making model based on the plithogenic pythagorean best –worst method which is an extension of the multi-valued neutrosophic approach of BWM. The efficiency of the developed model is determined with the example pertaining to the optimal selection of the teaching methods based on the attribute values or the sub criteria and it is also compared with the neutrosophic approach. In the proposed model plithogenic and pythagorean neutrosophic sets are used for representing the expert’s opinion.

A Hybrid Neutrosophic-Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process Method: Decision-Making Modelling in Uncertain Environments

A Hybrid Neutrosophic-Grey Analytic Hierarchy Process Method: Decision-Making Modelling in Uncertain Environments PDF Author: Amin Vafadarnikjoo
Publisher: Infinite Study
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 18

Book Description
The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is recognised as one of the most commonly applied methods in the multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) literature. In the AHP, encompassing uncertainty feature necessitates using suitable uncertainty theories, since dealing efficiently with uncertainty in subjective judgements is of great importance in real-world decision-making problems. The neutrosophic set (NS) theory and grey systems are two reliable uncertainty theories which can bring considerable benefits to uncertain decision-making. Thea im of this study is to improve uncertain decision-making by incorporating advantages of the NS and grey systems theories with the AHP in investigating sustainability through agility readiness evaluation in large manufacturing plants.

Dynamics Under Uncertainty: Modeling Simulation and Complexity

Dynamics Under Uncertainty: Modeling Simulation and Complexity PDF Author: Dragan Pamučar
Publisher:
ISBN: 9783036515755
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 210

Book Description
The dynamics of systems have proven to be very powerful tools in understanding the behavior of different natural phenomena throughout the last two centuries. However, the attributes of natural systems are observed to deviate from their classical states due to the effect of different types of uncertainties. Actually, randomness and impreciseness are the two major sources of uncertainties in natural systems. Randomness is modeled by different stochastic processes and impreciseness could be modeled by fuzzy sets, rough sets, Dempster-Shafer theory, etc.

Intelligent Buildings

Intelligent Buildings PDF Author: Derek Clements-Croome
Publisher: Thomas Telford
ISBN: 9780727732668
Category : Architecture
Languages : en
Pages : 428

Book Description
Intelligent buildings provide stimulating environments for people to work and live in. This book brings together a body of the latest knowledge about design, management, technology and sustainability set against the background of developments in the cultural landscapes, which affect those living and working in buildings.

Multiple-Criteria Decision Making

Multiple-Criteria Decision Making PDF Author: Goran Ćirović
Publisher:
ISBN: 9783036528168
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 312

Book Description
Decision-making on real-world problems, including individual process decisions, requires an appropriate and reliable decision support system. Fuzzy set theory, rough set theory, and neutrosophic set theory, which are MCDM techniques, are useful for modeling complex decision-making problems with imprecise, ambiguous, or vague data.This Special Issue, “Multiple Criteria Decision Making”, aims to incorporate recent developments in the area of the multi-criteria decision-making field. Topics include, but are not limited to:- MCDM optimization in engineering;- Environmental sustainability in engineering processes;- Multi-criteria production and logistics process planning;- New trends in multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable processes;- Multi-criteria decision making in strategic management based on sustainable criteria.

An Extended MABAC Method Based on Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers for Multiple-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems

An Extended MABAC Method Based on Triangular Fuzzy Neutrosophic Numbers for Multiple-Criteria Group Decision Making Problems PDF Author: Irvanizam Irvanizam
Publisher: Infinite Study
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 18

Book Description
In this manuscript, we extend the traditional multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method for the multiple-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) with triangular fuzzy neutrosophic numbers (TFNNs) to propose the TFNNs-MABAC method.

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Improvement Sustainability Engineering Processes

Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques for Improvement Sustainability Engineering Processes PDF Author: Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Publisher: MDPI
ISBN: 3039367781
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 490

Book Description
The success of any activity and process depends fundamentally on the possibility of balancing (symmetry) needs and their satisfaction. That is, the ability to properly define a set of success indicators. The application of the developed new multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods can be eliminated or decreased by decision-makers’ subjectivity, which leads to consistency or symmetry in the weight values of the criteria. In this Special Issue, 40 research papers and one review study co-authored by 137 researchers from 23 different countries explore aspects of multi-criteria modeling and optimization in crisp or uncertain environments. The papers propose new approaches and elaborate case studies in the following areas of application: MCDM optimization in sustainable engineering, environmental sustainability in engineering processes, sustainable multi-criteria production and logistics processes planning, integrated approaches for modeling processes in engineering, new trends in the multi-criteria evaluation of sustainable processes, and multi-criteria decision-making in strategic management based on sustainable criteria.

Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria

Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria PDF Author: Denis Bouyssou
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 0387310991
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 460

Book Description
Formal decision and evaluation models are so widespread that almost no one can pretend not to have used or suffered the consequences of one of them. This book is a guide aimed at helping the analyst to choose a model and use it consistently. A sound analysis of techniques is proposed and the presentation can be extended to most decision and evaluation models as a "decision aiding methodology".

New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM)

New Methods and Applications in Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM) PDF Author: Alireza Alinezhad
Publisher: Springer Nature
ISBN: 3030150097
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 236

Book Description
This book presents 27 methods of the Multiple Attribute Decision Making (MADM), which are not discussed in the existing books, nor studied in details, using more applications. Nowadays, decision making is one of the most important and fundamental tasks of management as an organizational goal achievement that depends on its quality. Decision making includes the correct expression of objectives, determining different and possible solutions, evaluating their feasibility, assessing the consequences, and the results of implementing each solution, and finally, selecting and implementing the solution. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is sum of the decision making techniques. MCDM is divided into the Multiple Objective Decision Making (MODM) for designing the best solution and MADM for selecting the best alternative. Given that the applications of MADM are mostly more than MODM, wide various techniques have been developed for MADM by researchers over the last 60 years, and the current book introduces some of the other new MADM methods.