Author: New South Wales. Parliament. Joint Select Committee upon Parliamentary Privilege
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative bodies
Languages : en
Pages : 2750
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Joint Committee Upon Parliamentary Privilege
Author: New South Wales. Parliament. Joint Select Committee upon Parliamentary Privilege
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative bodies
Languages : en
Pages : 2750
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative bodies
Languages : en
Pages : 2750
Book Description
Minutes of Proceedings Together with Certain Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Joint Select Committee of the Legislative Council and Legislative Assembly Upon Parliamentary Privilege
Author: New South Wales. Parliament. Joint Select Committee upon Parliamentary Privilege
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Minutes of Proceedings Together with Certain Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Joint Select Committee of the Legislative Council and Legislatice Assembly Upon Parliamentary Privilege
Author: New South Wales. Parliament
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative bodies
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Legislative bodies
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Committee for Privileges and Proceedings
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords. Committee for Privileges
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Peerage claims
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Peerage claims
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Before Committee of Privileges, 1825-44
Parliamentary Privilege in Canada
Author: Joseph P. Maingot
Publisher: McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP
ISBN: 0773567135
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 431
Book Description
Joseph Maingot describes the parameters of the principal immunity enjoyed by Members of Parliament, that of freedom of speech, which is restricted to the context of a parliamentary proceeding and not beyond. He points out protections afforded members other than parliamentary privilege and the view of both the courts and the legislatures concerning parliamentary debates and proceedings as evidence in court. He also sets out in detail what the House of Commons considers to be and not to be a matter of privilege, as well as the corporate powers of the Houses of Parliament.
Publisher: McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP
ISBN: 0773567135
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 431
Book Description
Joseph Maingot describes the parameters of the principal immunity enjoyed by Members of Parliament, that of freedom of speech, which is restricted to the context of a parliamentary proceeding and not beyond. He points out protections afforded members other than parliamentary privilege and the view of both the courts and the legislatures concerning parliamentary debates and proceedings as evidence in court. He also sets out in detail what the House of Commons considers to be and not to be a matter of privilege, as well as the corporate powers of the Houses of Parliament.
How Our Laws are Made
Author: John V. Sullivan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Book Description
Privacy and injunctions
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: Joint Committee on Privacy and Injunctions
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780108475719
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
This report says Parliament should not introduce any new privacy statute. It concludes that in weighing the competing rights to privacy and freedom of expression, each case must be judged on its own merits. The bar for limiting freedom of expression must be set high, but the courts are now striking a better balance in dealing with applications for privacy injunctions. Criticism that privacy law has been "judge-made", noting that it evolved from the Human Rights Act is rejected. The Committee says the most important step towards improving protection of privacy is to provide for enhanced regulation of the media. The Press Complaints Commission lacked the power, sanctions or independence to be truly effective. Substantial changes to press regulation are needed to ensure that it encompasses all major news publishers including, in time, major bloggers. The Committee makes several recommendations including that the reformed regulator should: have access to a wider range of sanctions, including the power to fine; be cost-free to complainants; be able to determine the size and location of a published apology, and the date of publication; play a greater role in arbitrating and mediating privacy disputes. One possible mechanism the Committee suggests is for advertisers to agree to advertise only in publications that are members of the press regulator and subscribe to its rules. It also concludes that parliamentarians should ensure that material subject to an injunction is only revealed in Parliament when there is good reason to do so
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780108475719
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
This report says Parliament should not introduce any new privacy statute. It concludes that in weighing the competing rights to privacy and freedom of expression, each case must be judged on its own merits. The bar for limiting freedom of expression must be set high, but the courts are now striking a better balance in dealing with applications for privacy injunctions. Criticism that privacy law has been "judge-made", noting that it evolved from the Human Rights Act is rejected. The Committee says the most important step towards improving protection of privacy is to provide for enhanced regulation of the media. The Press Complaints Commission lacked the power, sanctions or independence to be truly effective. Substantial changes to press regulation are needed to ensure that it encompasses all major news publishers including, in time, major bloggers. The Committee makes several recommendations including that the reformed regulator should: have access to a wider range of sanctions, including the power to fine; be cost-free to complainants; be able to determine the size and location of a published apology, and the date of publication; play a greater role in arbitrating and mediating privacy disputes. One possible mechanism the Committee suggests is for advertisers to agree to advertise only in publications that are members of the press regulator and subscribe to its rules. It also concludes that parliamentarians should ensure that material subject to an injunction is only revealed in Parliament when there is good reason to do so
Australian Senate Practice
Author: Australia. Parliament. Senate
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Australia
Languages : en
Pages : 650
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Australia
Languages : en
Pages : 650
Book Description