Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military research
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Book Description
Long-range Science and Technology Plan: DOD
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan: DOD
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan: Combat service support
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan: Base support
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan: Fire support
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan: Combat support
Author: Long-range Science and Technology Plan
Author: Strategic Long-Term Participation by DoD in Its Manufacturing USA Institutes
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and MedicinePublisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 030949138X
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 149
Book Description
To effectively mature and transition DoD manufacturing science and technology advances into production, DoD must have access to a robust and responsive U.S. industrial base which is often driven by advanced manufacturing technologies. The Manufacturing USA institutes are considered crucial and game-changing catalysts that are bringing together innovative ecosystems in various technology and market sectors critical to DoD and the nation. Since 2012, DoD has invested $600 million directly in its Manufacturing USA institutes with the understanding that the initial federal investment included (1) core funding and (2) one-time, start-up funding to establish the institutes within a period of 5 to 7 years. As the institutes now begin to reach year five, DoD is evaluating the effectiveness of the institutes in fulfilling their goals and the best on-going roles for the federal government, including on-going funding options, to ensure optimal benefit to U.S. competitiveness. This report reviews the role of DoD's investment to date in establishing its eight institutes as publicâ€"private partnerships and its engagement with each institute after it has matured beyond the start-up period.
Defense Science and Technology
Author: United States. Government Accountability OfficePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Defense contracts
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Book Description
Research and development projects in high-tech areas like cybersecurity and biotechnology can help the U.S. military reassert its technological edge. Contractors decide what independent R&D projects to conduct and the Department of Defense (DOD) reimburses them about $4 billion-$5 billion annually.More information about those projects could help DOD guide its own R&D investments. DOD does not know how contractors’ independent R&D projects fit into the department’s technology goals. As a result, DOD risks making decisions about its multi-billion dollar science and tech investments that could duplicate work or miss opportunities to fill in gaps that the contributions of private industry do not cover.DOD has a database of independent R&D projects, but it is not very useful for informing investment decisions because DOD does not obtain information in these and other areas: Priority. Contractors do not identify whether a project aligns with any of 10 modernization priorities. The department uses those priorities to make decisions about R&D investments. ; Cost. The database does not capture a project’s complete cost, which could help DOD understand cost implications of future related work. ; Innovation. The database does not include whether a project is a lower-risk, incremental development or a more innovative “disruptive” technology. Disruptive projects carry higher risk of failure but offer possible significant rewards in the long term. While DOD is not required to review independent R&D projects to understand how they support DOD’s priorities, GAO analysis showed 38 percent of industry projects aligned with DOD’s priorities. To help DOD better understand the scope and nature of independent projects, we recommend DOD determine whether to require additional information in the project database and review projects annually as part of its strategic planning process. DOD agreed with both recommendations.