Legal System and Lawyers' Reasonings PDF Download

Author: Julius Stone
Publisher:
ISBN: 9788175341364
Category : Jurisprudence
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description

Author: Julius Stone
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Jurisprudence
Languages : en
Pages : 454

View

Book Description

Author: Frederick Schauer
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 0674062485
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 256

View

Book Description
This primer on legal reasoning is aimed at law students and upper-level undergraduates. But it is also an original exposition of basic legal concepts that scholars and lawyers will find stimulating. It covers such topics as rules, precedent, authority, analogical reasoning, the common law, statutory interpretation, legal realism, judicial opinions, legal facts, and burden of proof.

Author: John Brendan Thornton
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780327179801
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description

Author: Neil MacCormick
Publisher: Clarendon Press
ISBN: 0191018597
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 322

View

Book Description
What makes an argument in a law case good or bad? Can legal decisions be justified by purely rational argument or are they ultimately determined by more subjective influences? These questions are central to the study of jurisprudence, and are thoroughly and critically examined in Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, now with a new and up-to-date foreword. Its clarity of explanation and argument make this classic legal text readily accessible to lawyers, philosophers, and any general reader interested in legal processes, human reasoning, or practical logic.

Author: Julius Stone
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Jurisprudence
Languages : id
Pages : 45

View

Book Description

Author: Kenneth J. Vandevelde
Publisher: Westview Press
ISBN: 0813344646
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 350

View

Book Description
When Kenneth J. Vandevelde’s Thinking Like a Lawyer first published, it became an instant classic, considered by many to be the gold standard introduction to legal reasoning. In this long-awaited second edition, intended for fans of the original and a new generation of lawyers, Vandevelde expands his classic work with useful revisions and updates throughout. Law students, law professors, and lawyers frequently refer to the process of “thinking like a lawyer,” but attempts to analyze in any systematic way what is meant by that phrase are rare. Vandevelde defines this elusive phrase and identifies the techniques involved in thinking like a lawyer. Unlike most legal writings, plagued by difficult, virtually incomprehensible language, Vandevelde’s work is accessible and clearly written. The second edition features new sections on the legislative process—describing step-by-step how legislation is enacted—and the judicial process—describing step-by-step how a case is litigated in court. Other new sections address the significance of dissenting and concurring opinions as well as the role of cognitive bias in factual determinations and on persuading a jury, on burdens of proof, and on presumptions. A new chapter provides contemporary perspectives on legal reasoning, which includes new material on feminist legal theory, critical race theory, and the economics of law. A new appendix is intended for prospective law students, explaining how readers can use the techniques in the book to help them excel in law school. Vandevelde’s Thinking Like a Lawyer will help students, lawyers, and lay readers alike gain important insight into a well-developed and valuable way of thinking. Professors and students will find the book useful in almost any introductory law course at the graduate level and in advanced undergraduate courses on law.

Author: William Powers
Publisher: University of Texas Press
ISBN: 147732643X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 239

View

Book Description
The way lawyers think about the law can seem deeply mysterious. They see nuance and meaning in statutes and implications in judicial opinions that are opaque to the rest of us. Accessible and thought provoking, Sharpening the Legal Mind explains how lawyers analyze the cases and controversies that come before the courts. Written by William Powers Jr., the former president of the University of Texas at Austin, this book is an authoritative introduction to the academic study of law and legal reasoning, including insights into the philosophy of law and the intellectual history of legal thought. Powers discusses the methods lawyers use to interpret the law, the relation between law and morals, and the role of courts in shaping the law. In eight chapters, he follows the historical debate on these issues and others through different generations and movements in American legal thought—formalism, realism, positivism—to critical legal studies and postmodern theory. The perfect read for anyone looking for a primer on legal reasoning, Sharpening the Legal Mind demystifies the debates and approaches to thinking like a lawyer that profoundly influence the rule of law in our lives.

Author: Steven J. Burton
Publisher: Aspen Publishers
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 240

View

Book Description
A dependable, practical source that: - Covers analogical and deductive reasoning, as well as the roles of legal conventions, purposes, and policies in legal reasoning - Discusses cases of varying difficulty to diversify the learning process - Presents law and legal reasoning primarily through discussions of cases and examples that avoid the abstraction characteristic of most competing books - Emphasizes the law as used in practice by lawyers and judges - Provides an explicit and systematic introduction to law and legal reasoning - Offers a source suitable for use as supplementary reading in any first year course, in legal research and writing courses, in paralegal courses, and in other settings This great new edition has been carefully updated to include: - A new chapter, "Hardest Cases," that highlights cases notorious in the press - Updates throughout that guarantee the most current legal information

Author: Neil MacCormick
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 0191018783
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 304

View

Book Description
Is legal reasoning rationally persuasive, working within a discernible structure and using recognisable kinds of arguments? Does it belong to rhetoric in this sense, or to the domain of the merely 'rhetorical' in an adversative sense? Is there any reasonable certainty about legal outcomes in dispute-situations? If not, what becomes of the Rule of Law? Neil MacCormick's book tackles these questions in establishing an overall theory of legal reasoning which shows the essential part 'legal syllogism' plays in reasoning aimed at the application of law, while acknowledging that simple deductive reasoning, though always necessary, is very rarely sufficient to justify a decision. There are always problems of relevancy, classification or interpretation in relation to both facts and law. In justifying conclusions about such problems, reasoning has to be universalistic and yet fully sensitive to the particulars of specific cases. How is this possible? Is legal justification at this level consequentialist in character or principled and right-based? Both normative coherence and narrative coherence have a part to play in justification, and in accounting for the validity of arguments by analogy. Looking at such long-discussed subjects as precedent and analogy and the interpretative character of the reasoning involved, Neil MacCormick expands upon his celebrated Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory (OUP 1978 and 1994) and restates his 'institutional theory of law'.