Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Book Description
Science and Technology Select Committee: The Implications for Science of the Higher Education White Paper. Minutes of Evidence 26 March 2003
The Implications for Science of the Higher Education White Paper
Author: Great Britain. Parliament House of Commons. Science and Technology Committee
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780215013736
Category : Higher education and state
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Book Description
The White paper "The future of higher education" was published as Cm 5735 (ISBN 0101573529) (January 2003)
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780215013736
Category : Higher education and state
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Book Description
The White paper "The future of higher education" was published as Cm 5735 (ISBN 0101573529) (January 2003)
The future sustainability of the higher education sector
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Education and Skills Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215036001
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 484
Book Description
Vol. 1, containing the main report, is also available (ISBN 9780215035868)
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215036001
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 484
Book Description
Vol. 1, containing the main report, is also available (ISBN 9780215035868)
The impact of spending cuts on science and scientific research
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Science and Technology Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215545213
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
The pressure to be seen to be making cuts across the public sector is threatening to undermine both the Government's good record on investment in science and the economic recovery. Whilst the contribution of a strong domestic science base is widely acknowledged, methodological problems with quantifying its precise value to the economy mean that it is in danger of losing out in Whitehall negotiations. Scientists are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the impact of their work and there is concern that areas without immediate technology applications are being undervalued. The Committee believes the Government faced a strategic choice: invest in areas with the greatest potential to influence and improve other areas of spending, or make cuts of little significance now, but that will have a devastating effect upon British science and the economy in the years to come.
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215545213
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
The pressure to be seen to be making cuts across the public sector is threatening to undermine both the Government's good record on investment in science and the economic recovery. Whilst the contribution of a strong domestic science base is widely acknowledged, methodological problems with quantifying its precise value to the economy mean that it is in danger of losing out in Whitehall negotiations. Scientists are under increasing pressure to demonstrate the impact of their work and there is concern that areas without immediate technology applications are being undervalued. The Committee believes the Government faced a strategic choice: invest in areas with the greatest potential to influence and improve other areas of spending, or make cuts of little significance now, but that will have a devastating effect upon British science and the economy in the years to come.
Science and Technology Committee 7th Report. Leaving the EU
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons. Select Committee on Science and Technology
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781785849114
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1283
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781785849114
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1283
Book Description
Science and Technology Select Committee: The Science and Innovation White Paper and the Science Budget. Minutes of Evidence 7 March 2001
Government proposals for the regulation of hybrid and chimera embryos
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Science and Technology Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215033536
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Book Description
For Vol. 1, see (ISBN 9780215033512)
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215033536
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Book Description
For Vol. 1, see (ISBN 9780215033512)
The Stationery Office Annual Catalogue
Author: Stationery Office (Great Britain)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 790
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 790
Book Description
Scientific advice and evidence in emergencies
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Science and Technology Committee
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215556561
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Book Description
In this report, the Science and Technology Committee examines how scientific advice and evidence is used in national emergencies, when the Government and scientific advisory system are put under great pressure to deal with atypical situations. The inquiry focused on four case studies: (i) the 2009-10 H1N1 influenza pandemic (swine flu); (ii) the April 2010 volcanic ash disruption; (iii) space weather; and (iv) cyber attacks. While science is used effectively to aid responses to emergencies, the detachment of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA) from the National Risk Assessment (NRA) - the key process of risk evaluation carried out by the Cabinet Office - is a serious concern. The Committee recommends that the NRA should not be signed off until the GCSA is satisfied that all risks requiring scientific input and judgements have been properly considered. A new independent scientific advisory committee should be set up to advise the Cabinet on risk assessment and review the NRA. The Icelandic volcanic eruption in April 2010 is a stark example of the lack of scientific input in risk assessment: the risk of disruption to aviation caused by a natural disaster was dropped from the assessment process in 2009, despite warnings from earth scientists. There are concerns over how risk was communicated to the public during the 2009-10 swine flu pandemic are raised in the report, with sensationalised media reporting about the projected deaths from swine flu. The Scientific Advisory Groups in Emergencies, set up to advise government during emergencies, were found to work in an unnecessarily secretive way.
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780215556561
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Book Description
In this report, the Science and Technology Committee examines how scientific advice and evidence is used in national emergencies, when the Government and scientific advisory system are put under great pressure to deal with atypical situations. The inquiry focused on four case studies: (i) the 2009-10 H1N1 influenza pandemic (swine flu); (ii) the April 2010 volcanic ash disruption; (iii) space weather; and (iv) cyber attacks. While science is used effectively to aid responses to emergencies, the detachment of the Government Chief Scientific Adviser (GCSA) from the National Risk Assessment (NRA) - the key process of risk evaluation carried out by the Cabinet Office - is a serious concern. The Committee recommends that the NRA should not be signed off until the GCSA is satisfied that all risks requiring scientific input and judgements have been properly considered. A new independent scientific advisory committee should be set up to advise the Cabinet on risk assessment and review the NRA. The Icelandic volcanic eruption in April 2010 is a stark example of the lack of scientific input in risk assessment: the risk of disruption to aviation caused by a natural disaster was dropped from the assessment process in 2009, despite warnings from earth scientists. There are concerns over how risk was communicated to the public during the 2009-10 swine flu pandemic are raised in the report, with sensationalised media reporting about the projected deaths from swine flu. The Scientific Advisory Groups in Emergencies, set up to advise government during emergencies, were found to work in an unnecessarily secretive way.