The Governor of Kansas PDF Download

Author: Marvin Andrew Harder
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Governors
Languages : en
Pages : 41

View

Book Description

Author: Robin Louise Flagg
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 127

View

Book Description
Abstract Governor Decision-making: Expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act By Robin Flagg Doctor of Philosophy in Health Services and Policy Analysis University of California, Berkeley Professor Ann C. Keller, Chair This is a study of factors that influence gubernatorial decision making. In particular, I ask why some governors decided to expand Medicaid under the Accountable Care Act (ACA) while others opted against it. Governors, like all chief executives, are subject to cross-pressures that make their jobs challenging. Budgetary pressures may differ from personal ideology and administrative infrastructures may not allow for decisive moves. Add to the equation political pressures - in particular the pressure to align with partisan positions - and a governor is faced with a myriad of opposing and interrelated factors, each requiring attention, when taking a particular position. The calculation required of a governor when deciding upon a salient issue is thus extremely complicated and nuanced. Although interesting in its own right, governor decision making is of additional significance because it may shed light on how the effects of increasing party strength and polarization are playing out at the state level. Partisan gridlock has dominated Congressional decision-making for much of the last decade. In Washington today partisan ideology dominates decision making. In particular, Republican elected officials increasingly espouse conservative policies and vociferously denounce any attempt at compromise. This study asks whether this ideology driven decision-making also exists at the state level. Specifically, I assess whether Governors are susceptible to the same partisan influences as elected officials in Washington and whether partisan politics and/or ideological polarization dominate governor decision-making as they do congressional actions. In particular, I study the factors involved in the decision-making process of each governor when deciding whether or not to support Medicaid expansion in his state. The focus of this study is the governor's calculations and considerations prior to "going public" with his position, irrespective of his success in getting his position adopted by the legislature. Specifically I explore the role the governor's party, the governor's personal ideology, the electoral results from the 2012 presidential election, the state's policy heritage, advocacy by state stakeholders, and the state economy played in the governor's calculations. A mixed method research design is used, with each component (the quantitative and the qualitative) addressing a different level of question. The first part of this study is a descriptive and statistical quantitative review of all governors, assessing the various weights the 50 governors appear to give each of the seven factors discussed above. This in turn provides a context for the second part of the research, an in-depth case study providing a comprehensive analysis of how two governors made this politically salient decision There are two main findings from this study: First, Mayhew's conclusion that congressmen legislate in a manner that promotes their reelection appears to apply in this case of governor decision-making. The partisan salience of the Medicaid expansion decision is a particularly strong test of this idea given that electoral pressures may influence less nationally prominent decisions, but weaken when partisan pressures are present and decisions are highly visible. And secondly, when studying variation across states, a mixed methods approach offers enhanced and nuanced findings as compared to a more quantitative model. This study has found that many factors influence governors' decision-making. However, electoral pressure was not only the most significant in the general model but also appeared central to the case study portion of this research. While other factors (e.g., economics, existing institutions, the role of stakeholders, and the governor's religion) were found to be statistically significant in the general model, data from the qualitative portion of this research suggests that many of these factors may have played a role not in taking a position, but rather as justification for the position taken. In both cases, the underlying driver for the decision appears to be electoral interest: both governors studied were primarily concerned with ensuring that their decision on this highly salient issue was consistent with what they believed the majority of their electorate would support. As necessary, they used other factors to help frame their final decision in a manner that they believed would appease their electorate. This study also highlights the power of a mixed method approach. While many of the findings of the general model are upheld by the case studies, without the rich information gleaned from the qualitative data augmenting the general model, the conclusions would have been too simplistic. The case study data portrays a number of examples in which the macro model over simplified the outcome and ultimately led to an incomplete or even erroneous conclusion. First, existing state political institutions (i.e., commissions, ballot initiative processes) and previous policy decisions render each governor's decision unique despite the fact that each maintains the same ultimate goal of political survival. Specifically, in Ohio the entire process of moving the decision out of the budgetary process and to the Controlling Board in Columbus was an attempt to avoid a polarizing vote and to allow otherwise ideologically opposed legislators to remain silent on expansion and ultimately retain party cohesion. This was clearly spearheaded by party leaders in support of their governor and instead of the internal party division projected by the general model. Overall, this study affirms that small "d" democracy is alive and well. Because governors, like congressmen, are profoundly concerned with how their position presents to their constituents and thus their political futures, they ensure that their position on salient and visibly issues is either consistent with that of their voters or at least can be explained to their voters in a manner that neutralizes any divergence from the majority position. In the end, all politics is local and politicians must maneuver a frame to address their situation. In order to accurately assess how a governor manages the sometimes opposing pressures of ideology and politics, an in-depth case study is called for.

Author: Jacqueline Vaughn
Publisher: Jones & Bartlett Learning
ISBN: 9780763746568
Category : Administrative agencies
Languages : en
Pages : 206

View

Book Description
Managerial Discretion In Government Decision Making: Beyond The Street Level Provides A Comprehensive Discussion Of Managerial And Executive Discretion At All Levels Of Government. Beginning With A Discussion Of Moving Beyond Street-Level Discourse, This Book Sets The Stage For Studying Managerial Discretion. It Examines Aspects Of Expertise In Discretionary Decision Making At The Federal Level, Including Several Case Examples To Account For The Wide Usage Of Executive Orders In Managerial Positions, And Examines The Formal Roles Of Managers At State Government Levels, While Highlighting The Variations Among State Managers In Their Usage Of Discretion, With Examples Of State Managers With Too Much Discretion. Next The Book Identifies Key Aspects Of Managerial Discretion In Local Governments, Including Information On The Applicability Of Discretion In School Districts And Its Implications In Decision Making, Discusses The Myriad Ways In Which Managers In Local Jurisdictions Either Individually Or Collectively Make Decisions Within The Parameters Of State Laws, Board Regulations, And/Or Council Ordinances, And Concludes With A Discussion Of How Much Discretion Managers Should Have And Dangers Inherent In Providing Managers With Too Much Discretion, And Reinforces The Discourses On Accountability In Public Organizations.

Author: Erdinc Filiz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cognitive psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 272

View

Book Description
This study examined the relationship between personality of district governors and their decision-making process. The study reveals that district governors take into consideration all decision-making factors seriously when making decisions. They have higher openness and conscientiousness scores with lower neuroticism. On the other hand, with the exception of extraversion and conscientiousness, the personality of a district governor does not create any differentiation on decision-making factors. Accordingly, district governors who exhibit a higher level of extraversion are likely to be task and context factors oriented, and they use intuitive thinking. District governors who score higher in conscientiousness are subject factors oriented, and they use rational thinking when making decisions. This study also suggests some possible policy implications for the recruitment, performance appraisal, training, and assignment of district governors.

Author: James K. Conant
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Governors
Languages : en
Pages : 420

View

Book Description

Author: James A. Adekayode
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Class size
Languages : en
Pages : 72

View

Book Description

Author: David N. Ammons
Publisher: SAGE
ISBN: 1483304590
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 367

View

Book Description
Known for encouraging step-by-step problem solving and for connecting techniques to real-world scenarios, David Ammons’ Tools for Decision Making covers a wide range of local government practices—from the foundational to the advanced. Brief and readable, each chapter opens with a problem in a hypothetical city and then introduces a tool to address it. Thoroughly updated with new local government examples, the second edition also incorporates chapters devoted to such additional techniques as sampling analysis, sensitivity analysis, financial condition analysis, and forecasting via trend analysis. Numerous tables, figures, exhibits, equations, and worksheets walk readers through the application of tools, and boxed features throughout each chapter present other uses for techniques, helpful online resources, and common errors. A handy guide for students and an invaluable resource and reference for practitioners.

Author: Gregory Scott Nichols
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education, Higher
Languages : en
Pages : 296

View

Book Description
This study focused on participant perceptions of roles and perceived influence of state Governors and their staffs in higher education policy-making. Reported increased activity by Governors and their staffs in education policy-making, coupled with increasing public demands and limited or reduced state resources for higher education lend relevance to this topic. Literature also suggests that higher education leaders and state officials may have differing views of their roles in state policy-making processes. The study was designed to capture participant perceptions as to processes, and roles and influence therein, not specific policy outcomes. Given the interpersonal and dynamic nature of the policy-making process, these perceptions were the focus of the study. Qualitative case study methodology was used in this study. Initially, a preliminary survey was administered to Governor's education policy advisors from ten states. Thereafter, a field study was conducted to examine policy-making in the states of Michigan and Kentucky. The study presents relevant background information on each state and commentary from approximately 50 in-depth personal interviews with governmental and education leaders in these states. The researcher has worked as a staff member of his state legislature, Governor's office, and as Executive Director of his state Board of Regents prior to assuming his current position as a Special Assistant to the President of Iowa State University. The commentary and emergent themes of the study are informed by those experiences as well as study data and existing literature. Study findings included a confirmation of the state-to-state variation in: public sector system design, social/economic/political culture, expectations for Executive branch involvement in higher education policy-making, and the roles and influence of the Governor and staff. While some similarities in states' approaches were noted as well, participants believed the circumstances in their state were unique from any other. The perceptions by and of some very experienced Governor's aides and state government and higher education officials in the study states may be of value in assessing similar situations. The study design, however, does not provide for quantifiable, transferable results that can necessarily be applied to differing points in time or differing locations.

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : People with disabilities
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description

Author: John V. Sullivan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 72

View

Book Description