Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Book Description
Gibson V. United States of America
Electing Judges
Author: James L. Gibson
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226291073
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 240
Book Description
"In Electing Judges, James L. Gibson responds to the growing chorus of critics who fear that the politics of running for office undermine judicial independence. While many people have opinions on the topic, few have supported them with empirical evidence. Gibson rectifies this situation, offering the most systematic study to date of the impact of campaigns on public perceptions of fairness, impartiality, and the legitimacy of elected state courts-and his findings are both counterintuitive and controversial"--Page [four] of cover.
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226291073
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 240
Book Description
"In Electing Judges, James L. Gibson responds to the growing chorus of critics who fear that the politics of running for office undermine judicial independence. While many people have opinions on the topic, few have supported them with empirical evidence. Gibson rectifies this situation, offering the most systematic study to date of the impact of campaigns on public perceptions of fairness, impartiality, and the legitimacy of elected state courts-and his findings are both counterintuitive and controversial"--Page [four] of cover.
Black and Blue
Author: James L. Gibson
Publisher:
ISBN: 0190865229
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 225
Book Description
A crisis of legitimacy exists between African Americans and American legal institutions. This book shows how and why African Americans differ in a desire to ascribe legitimacy to legal institutions, as well as a willingness to accept the policy decisions those institutions put forward.
Publisher:
ISBN: 0190865229
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 225
Book Description
A crisis of legitimacy exists between African Americans and American legal institutions. This book shows how and why African Americans differ in a desire to ascribe legitimacy to legal institutions, as well as a willingness to accept the policy decisions those institutions put forward.
Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations
Author: James L. Gibson
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 1400830605
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 195
Book Description
In recent years the American public has witnessed several hard-fought battles over nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. In these heated confirmation fights, candidates' legal and political philosophies have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations examines one such fight--over the nomination of Samuel Alito--to discover how and why people formed opinions about the nominee, and to determine how the confirmation process shaped perceptions of the Supreme Court's legitimacy. Drawing on a nationally representative survey, James Gibson and Gregory Caldeira use the Alito confirmation fight as a window into public attitudes about the nation's highest court. They find that Americans know far more about the Supreme Court than many realize, that the Court enjoys a great deal of legitimacy among the American people, that attitudes toward the Court as an institution generally do not suffer from partisan or ideological polarization, and that public knowledge enhances the legitimacy accorded the Court. Yet the authors demonstrate that partisan and ideological infighting that treats the Court as just another political institution undermines the considerable public support the institution currently enjoys, and that politicized confirmation battles pose a grave threat to the basic legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 1400830605
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 195
Book Description
In recent years the American public has witnessed several hard-fought battles over nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court. In these heated confirmation fights, candidates' legal and political philosophies have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations examines one such fight--over the nomination of Samuel Alito--to discover how and why people formed opinions about the nominee, and to determine how the confirmation process shaped perceptions of the Supreme Court's legitimacy. Drawing on a nationally representative survey, James Gibson and Gregory Caldeira use the Alito confirmation fight as a window into public attitudes about the nation's highest court. They find that Americans know far more about the Supreme Court than many realize, that the Court enjoys a great deal of legitimacy among the American people, that attitudes toward the Court as an institution generally do not suffer from partisan or ideological polarization, and that public knowledge enhances the legitimacy accorded the Court. Yet the authors demonstrate that partisan and ideological infighting that treats the Court as just another political institution undermines the considerable public support the institution currently enjoys, and that politicized confirmation battles pose a grave threat to the basic legitimacy of the Supreme Court.
Gibson V. United States of America
Mund V. United States of America
De Angelo V. United States of America
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. V. United States of America
Myers V. United States of America
Digest of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States Reported in Vols. 1-36 Supreme Court Reporter, Vols. 106-241 United States Reports, Vols. 27-60 Lawyer's Edition, United States Reports, 1882-1916, with a Table of Cases Digested
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 1232
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law reports, digests, etc
Languages : en
Pages : 1232
Book Description