Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 380
Book Description
George H. Corliss Vs. the Wheeler Manufacturing Co
George H. Corliss Vs. the Wheeler Manufacturing Co
Author: Wheeler & Wilson Company
Publisher: Theclassics.Us
ISBN: 9781230422978
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1860 edition. Excerpt: ...properties in the material not known before, is not within the field of invention. So substituting one known mechanical equivalent for another, or one known chemical equivalent for another, is not within the field of invention; and the reason is, because the mode of operation remains the same after the equivalent has been substituted as it uias before; and it is for the mode of operation that the patent is granted. And, therefore, if the learned counsel can succeed in satisfying the Court, that all Mr. Corliss has done is, to take some existing combination, and substitute in that combination one known mechanical equivalent for another, I agree that it is out of the field of invention. But if he made a new combination--if that combination was new, not by reason of the materials of which its parts were made, not by reason of the substitution of one known mechanical equivalent for another, but new, because it has introduced a new method of operation, then it is within the field of invention, and a patent may be granted for it. The quantity of inventive talent required to get at it, is of no importance. I need do no more than refer to the case of McCormick, 2d Blatchford, page 240, in support of this view of the patent law. The inquiry, then, really is, to which of these classes of operations Mr. Corliss' machine belongs. Has he taken an existing combination and substituted in it for one of its members a known mechanical equivalent, or has he made a combination which lias introduced a new mode of operation? There can be but one answer to that question. Trace through these old combinations and see whether you can find one of them which is like Corliss', save a mere change of one known mechanical equivalent for another. Is tho operation of the...
Publisher: Theclassics.Us
ISBN: 9781230422978
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 112
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1860 edition. Excerpt: ...properties in the material not known before, is not within the field of invention. So substituting one known mechanical equivalent for another, or one known chemical equivalent for another, is not within the field of invention; and the reason is, because the mode of operation remains the same after the equivalent has been substituted as it uias before; and it is for the mode of operation that the patent is granted. And, therefore, if the learned counsel can succeed in satisfying the Court, that all Mr. Corliss has done is, to take some existing combination, and substitute in that combination one known mechanical equivalent for another, I agree that it is out of the field of invention. But if he made a new combination--if that combination was new, not by reason of the materials of which its parts were made, not by reason of the substitution of one known mechanical equivalent for another, but new, because it has introduced a new method of operation, then it is within the field of invention, and a patent may be granted for it. The quantity of inventive talent required to get at it, is of no importance. I need do no more than refer to the case of McCormick, 2d Blatchford, page 240, in support of this view of the patent law. The inquiry, then, really is, to which of these classes of operations Mr. Corliss' machine belongs. Has he taken an existing combination and substituted in it for one of its members a known mechanical equivalent, or has he made a combination which lias introduced a new mode of operation? There can be but one answer to that question. Trace through these old combinations and see whether you can find one of them which is like Corliss', save a mere change of one known mechanical equivalent for another. Is tho operation of the...
George H. Corliss Vs. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Company
Author: George Henry Corliss
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Patent infringement
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Patent infringement
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Reports of Cases Arising Upon Letters Patent for Inventions
Author: Samuel Sparks Fisher
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Patent laws and legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 748
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Patent laws and legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 748
Book Description
Scientific American
The National Union Catalog, Pre-1956 Imprints
Memorial to the Honorable the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States
Author: Anonymous
Publisher: BoD – Books on Demand
ISBN: 3385460069
Category : Fiction
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Book Description
Reprint of the original, first published in 1882.
Publisher: BoD – Books on Demand
ISBN: 3385460069
Category : Fiction
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Book Description
Reprint of the original, first published in 1882.
A Bibliography of Nineteenth Century Legal Literature: A-G
Author: John Adams
Publisher: Avero Publications
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1096
Book Description
Publisher: Avero Publications
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1096
Book Description
Electrical Review and Western Electrician with which is Consolidated Electrocraft
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electrical engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 1318
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electrical engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 1318
Book Description