Factors Affecting Medical School Admission Decisions for Minority and Majority Applicants PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Factors Affecting Medical School Admission Decisions for Minority and Majority Applicants PDF full book. Access full book title Factors Affecting Medical School Admission Decisions for Minority and Majority Applicants by Albert P. Williams. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Albert P. Williams Publisher: RAND Corporation ISBN: Category : Business & Economics Languages : en Pages : 116
Book Description
Examines and compares admissions processes of ten medical schools from 1973 through 1975 for majority and minority applicants. Logit analysis is used to estimate weights given to GPA, MCAT, state of residence, and so on in deciding which applicants to admit. Science MCAT was the most heavily weighted component of the standardized test for majority applicants, followed by Verbal and Quantitative MCATS. Almost all schools favor majority applicants from their parent university's undergraduate school, and being a home state resident always improves admission chances. Undergraduate science grades and Science MCAT scores were heavily weighted in minority admissions decisions but there was no consistent weighting of Verbal or Quantitative MCAT. There is strong evidence of affirmative action: Minority applicants with better than a 50-50 chance of admission would rarely have had a better than a 1 in 20 chance of admission if evaluated by majority standards. 95 pp. Ref.
Author: Albert P. Williams Publisher: RAND Corporation ISBN: Category : Business & Economics Languages : en Pages : 116
Book Description
Examines and compares admissions processes of ten medical schools from 1973 through 1975 for majority and minority applicants. Logit analysis is used to estimate weights given to GPA, MCAT, state of residence, and so on in deciding which applicants to admit. Science MCAT was the most heavily weighted component of the standardized test for majority applicants, followed by Verbal and Quantitative MCATS. Almost all schools favor majority applicants from their parent university's undergraduate school, and being a home state resident always improves admission chances. Undergraduate science grades and Science MCAT scores were heavily weighted in minority admissions decisions but there was no consistent weighting of Verbal or Quantitative MCAT. There is strong evidence of affirmative action: Minority applicants with better than a 50-50 chance of admission would rarely have had a better than a 1 in 20 chance of admission if evaluated by majority standards. 95 pp. Ref.
Author: HHS Evaluation Documentation Center (U.S.) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Human services Languages : en Pages : 946
Book Description
Evaluations of programs conducted under HHS. Arranged according to agency sponsor, project title, report title, performer, abstract, descriptors, status start/end dates, and other identifying information. Subject, sponsor, program name indexes.
Author: Richard J. Herrnstein Publisher: Simon and Schuster ISBN: 143913491X Category : Social Science Languages : en Pages : 916
Book Description
The controversial book linking intelligence to class and race in modern society, and what public policy can do to mitigate socioeconomic differences in IQ, birth rate, crime, fertility, welfare, and poverty.
Author: Susan Welch Publisher: University of Michigan Press ISBN: 0472022717 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 202
Book Description
Affirmative action is one of the central issues of American politics today, and admission to colleges and universities has been at the center of the debate. While this issue has been discussed for years, there is very little real data on the impact of affirmative action programs on admissions to institutions of higher learning. Susan Welch and John Gruhl in this groundbreaking study look at the impact on admissions of policies developed in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's landmark 1978 Bakke decision. In Bakke, the Court legitimized the use of race as one of several factors that could be considered in admissions decisions, while forbidding the use of quotas. Opponents of affirmative action claim that because of the Bakke decision thousands of less-qualified minorities have been granted admission in preference to more qualified white students; proponents claim that without the affirmative action policies articulated in Bakke, minorities would not have made the gains they have made in higher education. Based on a survey of admissions officers for law and medical schools and national enrollment data, the authors give us the first analysis of the real impact of the Bakke decision and affirmative action programs on enrollments in medical and law schools. Admission to medical schools and law schools is much sought after and is highly competitive. In examining admissions patterns to these schools the authors are able to identify the effects of affirmative action programs and the Bakke decision in what may be the most challenging case. This book will appeal to scholars of race and gender in political science, sociology and education as well as those interested in the study of affirmative action policies. Susan Welch is Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Professor of Political Science, Pennsylvania State University. John Gruhl is Professor of Political Science, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Author: Albert P. Williams
Author: Albert P. Williams
Author: Rand Corporation
Author: HHS Evaluation Documentation Center (U.S.)
Author: 
Author: HHS Evaluation Documentation Center (U.S.)
Author: HHS Policy Information Center (U.S.)
Author: Richard J. Herrnstein
Author: Susan Welch
Author: 
Author: John E. Rolph