Author: D. Cazaux Publisher: ISBN: Category : Clay liner Languages : en Pages : 25
Book Description
Field infiltration tests are commonly used to assess the hydraulic conductivity of low permeability materials such as natural clay barriers and compacted clay liners. The soils used for compacted clay liners are always partially saturated and require very long testing times to reach steady-state flow conditions. Consequently, because they are less time consuming, laboratory tests are usually preferred for construction quality control. Nevertheless, it is well-known that field tests are more representative of the clay liner because of the scale effect. This is why, since the 1980s, the main issues associated with field procedures have been studied and several methods proposed for testing low-permeability materials within short time periods. The proposed methods are based on early-time flow analysis in unsaturated conditions and have been applied to various compacted soils under field and laboratory conditions. To evaluate these methods, we carried out a comprehensive testing program using a hydraulic field infiltrometer method (sealed single-ring infiltrometer) and a laboratory rigid-wall permeameter method that reproduces surface field test conditions. The laboratory tests were continued until saturated hydraulic conductivity was obtained so that this value could be compared against the hydraulic conductivity estimated from early-time analysis on the same specimen. The obtained results show the influence of (a) the initial moisture content, (b) the sorptivity and hydraulic head on the early-time infiltration rate, and (c) the final estimated hydraulic conductivity. A comparison of analysis methods shows the limitations of some and tries to explain the reasons for such inadequacies in the description of early-time unsaturated flows. Nevertheless, the conclusions of our study show that conventional early-time analyses give a good estimation of saturated hydraulic conductivity within a short time period compatible with construction quality-control procedures.
Author: DE. Daniel Publisher: ISBN: Category : Case history Languages : en Pages : 12
Book Description
A method of measuring the hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay liners in the field using single-ring infiltrometers has been developed. It is assumed that the ring has a diameter that is no less than the thickness of the clay liner and that the clay liner is underlain by a freely draining material with negligible suction. Finite element analyses were performed to develop correction factors that account for horizontal seepage for cases in which the ring infiltrometer is partially embedded into the liner. The correction factors were developed for a range in diameter of the ring and for ratios of horizontal to vertical hydraulic conductivity of 1, 10, and 100. Laboratory experiments were conducted to verify the results of finite-element analyses, but the laboratory results showed considerable scatter and were successful only in demonstrating that the finite-element results show the proper trends. Finally, the test method was tried in the field on a full-sized clay liner in which the actual hydraulic conductivity of the entire liner could be calculated from the known rate of leakage. The hydraulic conductivity measured in the infiltration test agreed almost perfectly with the computed overall hydraulic conductivity of the entire liner. It is concluded that the single-ring infiltration test can be used to measure the hydraulic conductivity of clay liners, although it is difficult to measure hydraulic conductivities that are substantially lower than 1 x 10-7 cm/s. In addition, the field tests may take several weeks to complete.
Author: Johnathan Dale Blanchard Publisher: ISBN: Category : Clay soils Languages : en Pages : 190
Book Description
The methods utilized to determine the hydraulic conductivity of compacted clay liners (CCLs) are of importance for safe guarding the environment from landfill leachate. Therefore, the methods utilized in the analysis of the Two Stage Borehole (TSB) test, as described in the ASTM D6391-11 (Method A, B, and C) standard, were evaluated. Data from hydraulic conductivity tests, as performed on three test pads, were utilized to review the ASTM D6391-11 equations. Additionally, two test pads were instrumented with volumetric water content and soil water matric potential sensors to facilitate the determination of field-obtained soil water characteristic curves (SWCCs) and hydraulic conductivity functions (k-functions) for unsaturated soils. For the determination of the SWCCs and k-functions, each test pad was subjected to an infiltration cycle, using either a sealed double ring infiltrometer or a two-stage borehole infiltrometer, followed by a drying cycle. To compare the results that were obtained from the field-obtained SWCCs and k-functions, laboratory tests were performed on Shelby tube samples acquired from the corresponding test pad. The obtained data were fitted using the van Genuchten model and the RETC (RETention Curve) program. The results that were obtained from TSB testing led to the conclusion that Method B and C, as written in the ASTMs D6391-11 standard contained errors that impacted the results that were obtained from hydraulic conductivity testing. Specifically, utilizing Method C provided results that were four times greater than the hydraulic conductivity and utilizing Method B provided results that were as much as two orders of magnitude greater than the hydraulic conductivity. Several recommendations are proposed herein to ensure accurate hydraulic conductivity analysis is performed in the future. It was further determined that a poor agreement exists between field-obtained and laboratory-obtained k-functions and SWCCs, as reported in other studies. Therefore, field-obtained k-functions are preferential, when available.
Author: National Research Council Publisher: National Academies Press ISBN: 0309108098 Category : Science Languages : en Pages : 135
Book Description
President Carter's 1980 declaration of a state of emergency at Love Canal, New York, recognized that residents' health had been affected by nearby chemical waste sites. The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, enacted in 1976, ushered in a new era of waste management disposal designed to protect the public from harm. It required that modern waste containment systems use "engineered" barriers designed to isolate hazardous and toxic wastes and prevent them from seeping into the environment. These containment systems are now employed at thousands of waste sites around the United States, and their effectiveness must be continually monitored. Assessment of the Performance of Engineered Waste Containment Barriers assesses the performance of waste containment barriers to date. Existing data suggest that waste containment systems with liners and covers, when constructed and maintained in accordance with current regulations, are performing well thus far. However, they have not been in existence long enough to assess long-term (postclosure) performance, which may extend for hundreds of years. The book makes recommendations on how to improve future assessments and increase confidence in predictions of barrier system performance which will be of interest to policy makers, environmental interest groups, industrial waste producers, and industrial waste management industry.
Author: G. Didier Publisher: ISBN: Category : Borehole Languages : en Pages : 22
Book Description
For waste facilities, field assessment of the hydraulic conductivity of fine- grained soils has been a real challenge for the past decades that has led to several types of test methods. Although standards (ASTM, NF, etc.) have been adopted in many countries, any test method needs careful application for constructing quality-control programs. The type of apparatus, its geometry, and even specimen preparation may be major sources of discrepancy. We compared hydraulic-conductivity values obtained from various field-testing methods (open, sealed, single and double infiltrometers, and borehole methods), and laboratory-testing methods such as oedometer cells or rigid and flexible-wall permeameters. Three materials were tested in this study: a compacted sandbentonite mixture, compacted clayey silt, and natural sandy clay. The field tests were run on soil-test pads whose characteristics were defined beforehand in the laboratory and the field. Comparison of the results shows a large range of hydraulic-conductivity values for a single soil sample. Such variability can commonly be explained by a scale effect, as demonstrated by the use of various types of diameter or geometry for the field or laboratory tests. Soil behavior (swelling or shrinkage) and test-analysis methods (saturated or unsaturated-flow analysis) are other important parameters. In conclusion, we identified the main problems affecting tests with infiltrometers and permeameters, and how they can be reduced or avoided by the improvement of current techniques.
Author: D. Cazaux
Author: Martin N. Sara
Author: A. S. Rogowski
Author: Joseph O. Sai
Author: DE. Daniel
Author: Johnathan Dale Blanchard
Author: National Research Council
Author: G. Didier
Author: 
Author: