Essays on Corporate Investment and Payout Policies PDF Download

Author: Huan Yang
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 300

View

Book Description
This dissertation comprises two independent essays that examine how the shareholder-creditor conflicts affect corporate investment, and how the enhanced labor power influences corporate payout policies. In the first chapter, I analyze the impact of shareholder-creditor conflicts on corporate risk-taking. In particular, I examine the role played by institutional dual-holders (i.e., those simultaneously holding a same firm's debt and equity) in corporate innovation. I find that firms held by dual-holders generate fewer but more valuable patents. To establish causality, I use a difference-in-differences approach based on the quasi-natural experiment of financial institution mergers. I further find that the decreased sensitivity of managerial compensation to firm risk might be one possible channel through which dual-holders affect risk shifting. The results suggest that shareholder-creditor conflicts indeed exist and lead to risk shifting, and that institutional dual ownership can partially mitigate this problem. The second chapter studies labor power as an important but largely under-explored determinant of corporate payout policy. Using a regression discontinuity approach that exploits locally exogenous variation in labor's collective bargaining power, I find that an increase in labor power lowers corporate payout. Operating flexibility is a plausible underlying mechanism through which labor power influences corporate payout. Firms use the saved earnings from reductions in payout to invest in net working capital rather than paying off debt or increasing cash holdings. This essay sheds new light on the determinants of payout policy and the role of labor power in corporate finance decisions.

Author: Tae Eui Lee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Cash flow
Languages : en
Pages : 82

View

Book Description
This dissertation consists of two essays on corporate policy. The first chapter analyzes whether being labeled a "growth" firm or a "value" firm affects the firms dividend policy. I focus on the dividend policy because of its discretionary nature and the link to investor demand. To address endogeneity concerns, I use regression discontinuity design around the threshold to assign firms to each category. The results show that "value" firms have a significantly higher dividend payout - about four percentage points - than growth firms. This approach establishes a causal link between firm "growth/value" labels and dividend policy. The second chapter develops investment policy model which associated with duration of cash flow. Firms are doing their business by operating a portfolio of projects that have various duration, and the duration of the project portfolio generates different duration of cash flow stream. By assuming the duration of cash flow as a firm specific characteristic, this paper analyzes how the duration of cash flow affects firms investment decision. I develop a model of investment, external finance, and savings to characterize how firms decision is affected by the duration of cash flow. Firms maximize total value of cash flow, while they have to maintain their solvency by paying a fixed cost for the operation. I empirically confirm the positive correlation between duration of cash flow and investment with theoretical support. Financial constraint suffocates the firm when they face solvency issue, so that model with financial constraint shows that the correlation between duration of cash flow and investment is stronger than low financial constraint case.

Author: Gustavo Grullon
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 286

View

Book Description

Author: Injoong Kim
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dividends
Languages : en
Pages : 206

View

Book Description
This dissertation consists of two essays. The first essay examines how corporate payout policies and debt can be interchangeably used as substitutes in controlling free cash flow (FCF) problems. The roles of retained earnings/total equity (RE/TE) and various risk measures, such as equity beta, cash flow beta, and volatility are also analyzed in the choice of different payout policies as substitute for debt. Evidence suggests that firms with lower debt tend to payout more to control for free cash flow problems, and this relation is mainly driven by dividends, suggesting that dividends are more direct substitute to debt in controlling FCF problems. Also, the results support that RE/TE significantly affects dividends, but the substitution effect induced by FCF problems is unaffected by the inclusion of RE/TE. Furthermore, contrary to the recent literature, when leverage is considered, the effect of FCF problem on dividends dominates the effect of RE/TE. Therefore, FCF problem still plays a very important role in explaining firm's payouts. Furthermore while equity beta and RE/TE have symmetric effects on dividends and repurchases, cash flow beta has asymmetric effects. Cash flow beta weakens the degree of substitution between dividends and leverage in favor of repurchases. Even after controlling for RE/TE, size and equity beta, cash flow beta has a significant explanatory power for a firm's dividend payments. The second essay examines the behavior of managers who are endowed with executive stock options and investigates a possible distortion of corporate payout policy and its fixing mechanism. Executive managers awarded with large stock options may have an incentive to substitute repurchases for dividends in their payout policy and this may results in an agency problem between managers and shareholders. Surprisingly, dividend protection that can fix this distorted managerial incentive by compensating managers for the amount of dividend payments is rarely adopted in US. Various hypotheses are tested to explain the observed low dividend protection rate. First, the accounting consideration based on the EPS dilution effect is studied. Second, the relationship between executive options and dividends is estimated after controlling for possible endogeneity issues using structural models. Third, investors' preferences between dividends and repurchases over the past history are studied controlling for various firm characteristics. Evidence suggests that while option grants makes executives more likely to pay out through repurchases, there is a concurring trend in investors' preferences. Taken together, the aligned preferences of managers and investors towards repurchases can help explain the observed low dividend protection rates.

Author: Ralph Bachmann
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business enterprises
Languages : en
Pages : 284

View

Book Description

Author: Jiri Tresl
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781303034923
Category : Dividends
Languages : en
Pages : 127

View

Book Description
The first essay examines the impact of insider trading law enforcement on dividend payout policy. We posit and confirm that firms use dividend payouts to mitigate agency costs caused by gaps in country-level investor protection. We find that first-time enforcement of insider trading laws leads to a lower likelihood of paying dividends, lower dividend amounts, lower dividend smoothing and target payout ratios. We also show that market value of dividends declines significantly following the enforcement of insider trading laws. These results suggest that dividends serve as a substitute bonding mechanism through which managers establish a reputation for the fair treatment of minority shareholders when insider trading is not restricted. Firms mitigate the shortcomings of a weak institutional environment by committing to higher and more consistent payout policies. The second essay investigates the interaction among dividend smoothing, equity value and agency costs. Using a comprehensive cross-country sample from 21 countries, we show that market puts a premium on smooth dividends and dividend smoothing increases with agency costs of equity. Most importantly, we find that the premium for smooth dividends is decreasing in shareholder rights, suggesting that when agency costs are small the market puts a low premium on smooth dividends. The bonding framework of dividend smoothing might also shed some light on why smoothing in the US has increased over time. Consistent with our findings, we argue that the necessity to smooth dividends has increased over time due to increasing repurchase-for-dividend substitution that is previously documented in Grullon and Michaely (2002). Further analyses show that on average $1 paid out through dividends contributes to equity value by about 40% more than $1 paid out in repurchases using the most conservative model. Put differently, in order not to reduce the value of equity, firms need to substitute $1.4 in repurchases for $1 decrease in dividends. To manage the enormous payout burden of dividend-repurchase substitution and to maximize equity value, managers have been increasingly compelled to make dividends smoother. Consistently, we show that firms that pay smoother dividends substitute dividends for repurchases at 23% faster rate than the firms with less smooth dividends. Overall, these results support the view that dividend smoothing is a bonding mechanism used to undo the agency cost discount on equity valuation.

Author: Carrie H. Pan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Consolidation and merger of corporations
Languages : en
Pages : 144

View

Book Description
Abstract: This dissertation examines two issues that are related to corporate payout policy. The first essay investigates the impact of financial development on dividend policy across countries, an issue that has largely been overlooked by the literature. The second essay investigates the relation between managerial entrenchment and firms' propensity to pay dividends in the U.S. Financial development has a positive influence on dividend policy because it improves a firm's access to external finance and it helps control the agency conflicts between corporate insiders and outside shareholders. Such influence reduces the firm's incentive to retain profits. Therefore, financial development should encourage higher dividend payouts and earlier dividend initiations. The first dissertation essay, presented in Chapter 2, tests this hypothesis. I find it to be true using a large sample of industrial firms across 44 countries. The results are robust to various measures of financial development. Moreover, I show that this effect is not driven by the difference in legal protection of minority shareholders across countries. In the second essay, presented in Chapter 3, I find that firms with entrenched managers, as measured by strong managerial power resulting from takeover protections, are more likely to pay dividends. Their high propensity to pay persists over time. While these results are surprising in light of the conventional wisdom, they support the view that firms choose a combination of governance provisions and dividend policy to maximize value. A large cash reserve can be used to deter hostile takeovers. Paying dividends reduces cash holdings, leaving the firm more vulnerable to hostile takeovers. In equilibrium, value-maximizing firms with weak investment opportunities protect managers against takeovers to induce them to distribute cash rather than build a warchest of cash against unwanted takeovers.

Author: Lin William Cong
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
This thesis consists of two essays that examine several problems in corporate finance and mechanism design. The central theme is endogenous agency conflicts and their impact on dynamic investment decisions. The first essay features auctions of assets and projects with embedded real options, and subsequent exercises of these investment options. The essay shows timing and security choice of auctions endogenously misalign incentives among agents and derives the optimal auction design and exercise strategy. The second essay studies implications of endogenous learning on irreversible investment decisions, in particular, how learning gives rise to asymmetric information between managers and shareholders in decentralized firms. Depending on the quality of the project, the optimal contract between principal and agent distorts investments in ways that has not been examined in the literature. Specifically, in Chapter 1 of the dissertation, I study how governments and corporations auction real investment options using both cash and contingent bids. Examples include sales of natural resource leases, real estate, patents and licenses, and start-up firms with growth options. I incorporate both endogenous auction initiation and post-auction option exercise into the traditional auctions framework, and show that common security bids create moral hazard because the winning bidder's real option differs from the seller's. Consequently, investment could be either accelerated or delayed depending on the security design. Strategic auction timing affects auction initiation, security ranking, equilibrium bidding, and investment; it should be considered jointly with security design and the seller's commitment level. Optimal auction design aligns investment incentives using a combination of down payment and royalty payment, but inefficiently delays sale and investment. I also characterize informal negotiations as timing and signaling games in which bidders can initiate an auction and determine the forms of bids. I show that post-auction investments are efficient and bidding equilibria are equivalent to those of cash auctions. However, in this setting, bidders always initiate the informal auctions inefficiently early. In addition, I provide suggestive evidence for model predictions using data from the leasing and exploration of oil and gas tracts, which leads to several ongoing empirical studies. Altogether, these results reconcile theory with several empirical puzzles and imply novel predictions with policy relevance. In Chapter 2, I examine learning as an important source of managerial flexibility and how it naturally induces information asymmetry in decentralized firms. Timing of learning is crucial for investment decisions, and optimal strategies involve sequential thresholds for learning and investing. Incentive contracts are needed for learning and truthful reporting. The inherent agency conflicts alter investment behavior significantly, and are costly to investors and welfare. But contracting on learning restores efficiency with low future uncertainty or sufficient liquidity. Unlike prior studies, the moral hazard of learning accelerates good projects and delays bad projects. Even the best type's investment is distorted, and only when learning is contractible can adverse selection dominate learning.

Author: Tareque Nasser
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic dissertations
Languages : en
Pages : 216

View

Book Description
This dissertation contains three distinct essays in the broad area of corporate finance. The first two essays examine the role of an independent director who is also a blockholder (IDB), a potent governance mechanism, on executive compensation, and corporate financial and investment policies, respectively. The last essay examines insider trading in takeover targets. The first essay examines three issues. First, we investigate the determinants of an IDB's presence in a firm. Second, we examine the relations between IDB presence and (1) the level and structure of CEO compensation, and (2) CEO turnover-performance sensitivity. Third, we analyze if IDB presence is related to firm valuation. Our findings suggest that the presence of an independent blockholder on the board promotes better incentives and monitoring of the CEO, and consequently leads to higher firm valuation. In the second essay, we examine how the presence of an IDB affects: (1) four key financial and investment policy choices of a firm: the levels of cash holdings, dividends, investments and financial leverage, and (2) firm risk. We also examine how the market values IDB presence and changes in various policy choices associated with IDB presence in a firm. We find that firms with IDBs have significantly lower levels of cash holdings, dividend yields, repurchases, and total payout, but higher levels of capital expenditures. We also find that firms with IDBs have lower risk. Overall, IDB presence appears to reduce agency problems between managers and shareholders. The third essay brings large-sample evidence on whether the level and pattern of profitable insider trading before takeover announcements is abnormal for a broad cross-section of targets of takeovers during modern times. We find an interesting and subtle pattern in the average pre-takeover trading behavior of target insiders. While insiders reduce both their purchases and sales below normal levels, their sales reduce more than purchases, leading to an increase in net purchases. This pattern of 'passive' insider trading is confined to the six-month period before takeover announcement, holds for each insider group, for all measures of net purchases examined, and in certain sub-samples with less uncertainty about takeover completion.

Author: Emre Unlu
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dividend reinvestment
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
This dissertation contains 3 essays on dividend/payout policy. In the first essay, using a sample of 76,129 firm-years from 32 countries, I show that both the probability and amount of dividend payments are significantly lower in countries with poor creditor rights. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that poor creditor protection exacerbates the agency costs of debt. Poorly-protected creditors have a strong incentive to protect their investment by restricting dividend payments through formal debt covenants and multiperiod contracting. Firm managers also have an incentive to restrict dividends in order to build reputation capital, thereby reducing moral hazard problems and financing costs. The second essay examines the impact of managerial myopia on dividend catering and is based on US firms. I find strong evidence that the sensitivity of dividend changes to dividend premiums increase with managerial myopia. These findings are robust to firm-characteristics, idiosyncratic risk, taxes, time trends and potential sample selection biases. The last essay documents that increasing use of repurchases largely explains the disappearing dividends puzzle documented by Fama and French (2001). I find no evidence of consistent declining propensity to pay out cash for US firms after controlling for changing firm characteristics. By extending the Fama and French (2001) methodology, I examine the behavior of abnormal payout amount. Results show that most firms pay out 92.8% of the predicted payout amount. These findings are consistent with dividend-repurchase substitution documented by Grullon and Michaely (2002).