Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Environmental Review Commission
Author: Environmental Review Commission
Author: Environmental Review Commission
Author: North Carolina General Asse CommissionPublisher: Forgotten Books
ISBN: 9780656400423
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Excerpt from Environmental Review Commission: Report to the 2003 General Assembly of North Carolina, 2004 Regular Session Commission submits its report and recommendations to the 1999 General Assembly for the 2000 Regular Session. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
Environmental Review Commission
Author: North Carolina. General Assembly. Environmental Review CommissionPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Book Description
Environmental Review Commission
Author: North Carolina. General Assembly. Environmental Review CommissionPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental law
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Book Description
Green Goals And Green Backs
Author: Stuart L HartPublisher: Routledge
ISBN: 0429728182
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 387
Book Description
Since the signing of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) on January 1, 1970, eighteen states have initiated their own programs of compre-hensive environmental review. These State Environ-mental Policy Acts (SEPA's), or "NEPA equivalents," &re generally patterned after the policies, goals, and processes established by NEPA but, at the same time, demonstrate a great deal of variability in terms of extent as well as style of implementation. They are "equivalent," however, in the sense that they all utilize a similar tool--the environmental impact statement (EIS).
Environmental Review Manual
Author: South Central Alabama Development CommissionPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 102
Book Description
National Environmental Policy Act Oversight
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries. Subcommittee on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation and the EnvironmentPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 280
Book Description
Amending the National Environmental Policy Act
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Superfund, Ocean, and Water ProtectionPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 196
Book Description
Strengthening Science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Author: National Research CouncilPublisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309071275
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 178
Book Description
In the three decades since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was created, the agency's scientific and technical practices and credibility have been independently assessed many times in reports from the National Research Council (NRC), EPA Science Advisory Board, General Accounting Office, and many other organizations; in congressional oversight and judicial proceedings; and in countless criticisms and lawsuits from stakeholders with interests in particular EPA regulatory decisions. As a previous independent panel put it in the 1992 report Safeguarding the Future: Credible Science, Credible Decisions, EPA's policy and regulatory work receives a great deal of public attention, but the agency's scientific performance typically receives a similar degree of attention only when the scientific basis for a decision is questioned. Thus, strong scientific performance is important not only to enable EPA to make informed and effective decisions, but also to gain credibility and public support for the environmental protection efforts of EPA and the nation. This report is the fourth and final one in a series prepared by two independent expert committees convened by the NRC in response to a request from Congress and to subsequent, related requests from EPA. The Committee on Research Opportunities and Priorities for EPA-the companion committee in this study-was charged to provide an overview of significant emerging environmental issues, identify and prioritize research themes most relevant to understanding and resolving those issues, and consider the role of EPA's research program in the context of research being conducted or supported by other organizations. That committee published an interim report in 1996 and a final report, Building a Foundation for Sound Environmental Decisions, in 1997. The Committee on Research and Peer Review in EPA was charged to evaluate research management and scientific peer-review practices in the agency. The committee published an interim report in 1995 and this final report.