Author: Michigan. Department of Natural ResourcesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal-fired power plants
Languages : en
Pages : 424
Book Description
Environmental Impact Statement for Issuance of Permits, Licenses and Approvals for Cliffs Electric Service Company Power Generating Units 7, 8, and 9 in the City of Marquette, Marquette County
Author: Michigan. Department of Natural ResourcesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal-fired power plants
Languages : en
Pages : 424
Book Description
Dinkey Creek Project No. 2890, California
Author: United States. Office of Electric Power RegulationPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electric power-plants
Languages : en
Pages : 352
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Author: United States. Office of Electric Power RegulationPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 251
Book Description
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Author: United States. Office of Electric Power RegulationPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact analysis
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Author: United States. Office of Electric Power RegulationPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hydroelectric power plants
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement. Permit Application by Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., Proposed Lake Erie Generating Station, Pomfret and Sheridan, New York
Author: Arthur K. MarksPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 981
Book Description
A detailed analysis of the environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a coal-fired steam electric generating station. Two locations along the southeastern shore of Lake Erie in Chautauqua County, New York have been proposed for this facility. The primary site occupies a 1,054 acre tract of land in the Town of Pomfret, New York, while the secondary site in Sheridan, New York has a total area of approximately 986 acres. Steam produced by this facility will be used to generate approximately 1,700 megawatts of electrical power. The water intake and effluent discharge system will be located in Lake Erie and coal will be delivered to this plant by means of an offshore unloading facility. Approximately 6,000,000 tons of coal will be consumed annually by the Lake Erie Generating Station. (Author).
Draft Environmental Impact Statement on the Proposed Montana Power Company, Puget Sound Power & Light Company, Portland General Electric Company, Pacific Power and Light, and Washington Water Power Company, Colstrip Electric Generating Units 3 & 4 ...
Author: Montana. Energy Planning DivisionPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Issuance of a New Source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit to Jacksonville Electric Authority, St. Johns River Power Park
Author: Sutter Power Project Final Environmental Impact Statement
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 5
Book Description
Western Area Power Administration operates and maintains a high-voltage electric transmission system in California to deliver power to qualified customers. Calpine Corporation has requested that Western study and consider the feasibility of an interconnection with Western's Keswick-Elverta/Olinda-Elverta 230-kilovolt (kV) transmission lines. Calpine proposed to construct and operate of the Sutter Power Project. The project, as proposed, would include a 500 megawatt (MW) natural gas-fueled, combined-cycle, electric generation facility; a new 5.7 mile 230-kV generation tie-line; a transmission line switching station; and a 12-mile (16 inch) natural gas pipeline to connect with Pacific Gas and Electric's Line 302. The siting of the project's generation facility is proposed on a portion of a 77-acre parcel of land owned by Calpine, adjacent to Calpine's existing Greenleaf 1 cogeneration powerplant in Sutter County, approximately 7 miles south of Yuba City and 36 miles northwest of Sacramento. Calpine's stated objective for developing the Sutter Powerplant is to sell power to a mix of retail and wholesale customers in the newly deregulated electricity market. As a ''merchant plant, '' Calpine intends to sell power on a short and mid-term basis to customers, and on the spot market. On July 29, 1998, Western issued a Sutter Powerplant Interconnection Feasibility Study. The study results indicated that the output from the proposed Sutter Powerplant Project would improve system reliability in the generation deficient Sacramento area. Based on Western's interest in improving system reliability and as the owner of the transmission lines for the proposed project interconnection, Western is the lead federal agency responsible for the project's National Environmental Policy Act compliance. The California Energy Commission has the statutory authority to license thermal powerplants of 50 MW or greater. The Energy Commission's siting facility certification process has responsibilities that are functionally equivalent to those of a lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act. Because of these similar agency responsibilities to examine environmental impacts, Western and the Energy Commission are joint-lead agencies for this project's environmental review. Although this arrangement was successful during the scoping and ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement'' stages of review, the two agency processes were separated at the close of the ''Draft Environmental Impact Statement'' public comment period on December 14, 1998, to assure process integrity for each agency.
Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Issuance of New Source National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit to Tampa Electric Company, Big Bend Unit 4, Hillsborough County, Florida
Author: United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Region IV.Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description