Environmental Assessment for the Realignment of Sacramento Army Depot Activities to McClellan Air Force Base, California PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Environmental Assessment for the Realignment of Sacramento Army Depot Activities to McClellan Air Force Base, California PDF full book. Access full book title Environmental Assessment for the Realignment of Sacramento Army Depot Activities to McClellan Air Force Base, California by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 76
Book Description
This environmental assessment (EA) has been provided to analyze the environmental consequences associated with realignment of ten maintenance workloads (electronic maintenance and testing) from the Sacramento Army Depot, California, to McClellan Air Force Base (AFB), California. This document has been prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the regulations of the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) for NEPA compliance, and Air Force Regulation 19-2, which implements these laws and regulations. Section 1.0, Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action, presents the purpose and need, scoping process for the EA, and applicable regulatory compliance and coordination. Section 2.0, Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives, describes the project in detail, addresses alternatives, and summarizes project impacts and mitigation measures. Section 3.0, Affected Environment, provides a description of the potentially affected physical and human environments. Section 4.0, Environmental Consequences, describes the potential impacts of implementing the Proposed Action and No-Action Alternative and any mitigation measures required.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 76
Book Description
This environmental assessment (EA) has been provided to analyze the environmental consequences associated with realignment of ten maintenance workloads (electronic maintenance and testing) from the Sacramento Army Depot, California, to McClellan Air Force Base (AFB), California. This document has been prepared in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the regulations of the President's Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) for NEPA compliance, and Air Force Regulation 19-2, which implements these laws and regulations. Section 1.0, Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action, presents the purpose and need, scoping process for the EA, and applicable regulatory compliance and coordination. Section 2.0, Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives, describes the project in detail, addresses alternatives, and summarizes project impacts and mitigation measures. Section 3.0, Affected Environment, provides a description of the potentially affected physical and human environments. Section 4.0, Environmental Consequences, describes the potential impacts of implementing the Proposed Action and No-Action Alternative and any mitigation measures required.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 104
Book Description
Due to the changing international political scene and the resultant shift toward a reduction in defense spending, the Department of Defense must realign and reduce its military forces pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Public Law 101 -510, Title XXIX). As a requirement of this law, the 940th ARG with its 1 0 KC-1 35E aircraft must realign from Mather AFB, California, which is scheduled to close in 1993, to McClellan AFB, California. This EA analyzes the potential environmental impacts from the realignment. As part of the realignment the Air Force is planning construction of 5 new buildings, 13 housing duplexes, an addition to 1 existing building, a hydrant fueling system, renovation to 14 existing facilities for interim and permanent use, and the demolition of 13 Wherry Housing units. Alternatives include the use of fuel trucks to fuel and defuel the aircraft instead of the hydrant fueling system (Fuel Truck Alternative), and siting the Squadron Operations Facility at three possible locations (Squadron Operations/Group Headquarters Alternatives A, 8, and C). The No-Action Alternative would conflict with the Defense Bass Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 and, therefore, cannot be implemented without a change in the law. Construction activities for the Proposed Action and alternatives would take place on a concrete aircraft parking apron, or on areas previously disturbed by past grading activities, except for less than 10 acres of undisturbed land required for new facilities.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies Publisher: ISBN: Category : United States Languages : en Pages : 1234
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: California. National Guard
Author: 
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies