![Effects of Task Type on Causal Attributions for Success and Failure [microform] : Will Different Task Types Produce Self-serving Or Group-serving Biases? PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/VTCrMwEACAAJ?fife=w150-h200)
Author: Andrea Elizabeth BrownPublisher: Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms International
ISBN:
Category : Achievement motivation
Languages : en
Pages : 262
Book Description
Effects of Task Type on Causal Attributions for Success and Failure [microform] : Will Different Task Types Produce Self-serving Or Group-serving Biases?
![Effects of Task Type on Causal Attributions for Success and Failure [microform] : Will Different Task Types Produce Self-serving Or Group-serving Biases? PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/VTCrMwEACAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Andrea Elizabeth BrownPublisher: Ann Arbor, Mich. : University Microfilms International
ISBN:
Category : Achievement motivation
Languages : en
Pages : 262
Book Description
The Effects of Anticipated Publicity on Causal Attributions for Positive and Negative Task Outcomes
Author: Gregory Keith LewisPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Behaviorism (Psychology)
Languages : en
Pages : 136
Book Description
Attributing the Causes of Group Performance: Effects of Performance Quality, Task Importance, and Future Testing
Author: Barry R. SchlenkerPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Book Description
An egocentric perception model of attribution suggests that three major factors affect self-serving perceptual biases which occur after task performance: performance quality, the importance of the task, and the possibility of continuing to work on similar future tasks. To assess the effects of these variables on attributions, 126 subjects worked in four-person, same-sex groups on a social sensitivity task. The 2 by 2 by 2 by 2 factorial design included: (a) group success or failure, (b) high versus low task importance, (c) expectations of future testing versus no future testing, and (d) sex of subjects. Although the manipulation checks indicated that the task importance and future testing manipulations were quite successful, only group performance consistently affected attributions. As compared to subjects in groups that failed, successful subjects attributed greater responsibility for the performance to self, average group member, and group as a whole, and attributed the cause of the performance more to personal ability and less to internal constraints, situational distractions, and task difficulty. The results support an information processing model of egocentrism rather than a self-serving motivational model, and extend previous findings of attributed causality that were obtained in individual testing situations to group testing situations. (Author).
Task Difficulty and Feedback in Groups
Author: Jonathan J. NeginThe Effects of Self-perceived Instrumentality and Expressiveness, Sex-linkage of Task, and Manipulation of Success and Failure on Causal Attributions of Performance
Author: Elaine Susan HantmanPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Achievement motivation
Languages : en
Pages : 182
Book Description
Adaptive Causal Attributions for Success and Failure in a Sustained, Difficult Helping Task
Author: Paula W. StoesselPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Developmentally disabled
Languages : en
Pages : 434
Book Description
Causal Attributions for Male and Female Success
Author: Jacqueline A. CampbellPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Attribution (Social psychology)
Languages : en
Pages : 374
Book Description
The Effect of Task Description on Attributions Following Success and Failure
Author: William D. BurroughsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Self-perception
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Book Description
The Effects of Causal Attributions and Noncontingent Success and Failure on Learned Helplessness
Author: James C. AbramsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Attribution (Social psychology)
Languages : en
Pages : 134
Book Description
The Effect of Modeling Upon Causal Attributions for Success and Failure
Author: Adrian Hal ThurstinPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Social psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 298
Book Description