Author: Christina VulovaPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Earth pressure
Languages : en
Pages : 530
Book Description
Effects of Geosynthetic Reinforcement Spacing on the Behavior of Mechanical Stabilized Earth Walls
Author: Christina VulovaPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Earth pressure
Languages : en
Pages : 530
Book Description
Effects of Geosynthetic Reinforcement Spacing on the Performance of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
Author: Christina VulovaPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Geosynthetics
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Effects of Geosynthetic Reinforcement Spacing on the Performance of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
Author: Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls
Author: Jonathan T. H. WuPublisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1119375843
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 414
Book Description
The first book to provide a detailed overview of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls deploy horizontal layers of closely spaced tensile inclusion in the fill material to achieve stability of a soil mass. GRS walls are more adaptable to different environmental conditions, more economical, and offer high performance in a wide range of transportation infrastructure applications. This book addresses both GRS and GMSE, with a much stronger emphasis on the former. For completeness, it begins with a review of shear strength of soils and classical earth pressure theories. It then goes on to examine the use of geosynthetics as reinforcement, and followed by the load-deformation behavior of GRS mass as a soil-geosynthetic composite, reinforcing mechanisms of GRS, and GRS walls with different types of facing. Finally, the book finishes by covering design concepts with design examples for different loading and geometric conditions, and the construction of GRS walls, including typical construction procedures and general construction guidelines. The number of GRS walls and abutments built to date is relatively low due to lack of understanding of GRS. While failure rate of GMSE has been estimated to be around 5%, failure of GRS has been found to be practically nil, with studies suggesting many advantages, including a smaller susceptibility to long-term creep and stronger resistance to seismic loads when well-compacted granular fill is employed. Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls will serve as an excellent guide or reference for wall projects such as transportation infrastructure—including roadways, bridges, retaining walls, and earth slopes—that are in dire need of repair and replacement in the U.S. and abroad. Covers both GRS and GMSE (MSE with geosynthetics as reinforcement); with much greater emphasis on GRS walls Showcases reinforcing mechanisms, engineering behavior, and design concepts of GRS and includes many step-by-step design examples Features information on typical construction procedures and general construction guidelines Includes hundreds of line drawings and photos Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls is an important book for practicing geotechnical engineers and structural engineers, as well as for advanced students of civil, structural, and geotechnical engineering.
Effect of Reinforcement Length on the Behavior of Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Walls with Varying Soil Properties
Author: Heung Sea KimPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Retaining walls
Languages : en
Pages : 258
Book Description
Long-term Behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall System
Author: Numerical Simulation of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls for Parametric Evaluation of Behavior Under Surcharge Loading
Author: Spencer J. AmbauenPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 215
Book Description
A numerical model, simulating the complex behavior of reinforced soil walls using the finite element method, was developed to evaluate the behavior of a surcharged, geosynthetic-reinforced retaining wall with modular block facing. A nonlinear elastic-plastic constitutive soil material model was calibrated to experimental plane strain test data, while the performance of the wall model was validated against full-scale laboratory testing of an identical geosynthetic-reinforced wall. The results from both the constitutive model and the wall model were also compared to predictions made in the literature. It was found that the behavior of the reinforced soil wall was adequately represented by the numerical model at the end of construction and throughout the surcharge loading sequence. Furthermore, evaluation of the parametric analysis demonstrated the inter-dependencies and combined influence of various design parameters. Impacts of reinforcement spacing versus stiffness were investigated, along with stress distributions and load shedding relative to footing placement. Lateral earth pressures at the facing were compared to predictions from conventional design methods and measured loads in the reinforcement. The finite element model was also assessed of its ability to predict ultimate limit state conditions in reinforced soil walls.
Effect of Reinforcement Compromise on the Behavior of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls
Author: Ahmed RaghebGeosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls
Author: Jonathan T. H. WuPublisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1119375851
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 418
Book Description
The first book to provide a detailed overview of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Walls Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls deploy horizontal layers of closely spaced tensile inclusion in the fill material to achieve stability of a soil mass. GRS walls are more adaptable to different environmental conditions, more economical, and offer high performance in a wide range of transportation infrastructure applications. This book addresses both GRS and GMSE, with a much stronger emphasis on the former. For completeness, it begins with a review of shear strength of soils and classical earth pressure theories. It then goes on to examine the use of geosynthetics as reinforcement, and followed by the load-deformation behavior of GRS mass as a soil-geosynthetic composite, reinforcing mechanisms of GRS, and GRS walls with different types of facing. Finally, the book finishes by covering design concepts with design examples for different loading and geometric conditions, and the construction of GRS walls, including typical construction procedures and general construction guidelines. The number of GRS walls and abutments built to date is relatively low due to lack of understanding of GRS. While failure rate of GMSE has been estimated to be around 5%, failure of GRS has been found to be practically nil, with studies suggesting many advantages, including a smaller susceptibility to long-term creep and stronger resistance to seismic loads when well-compacted granular fill is employed. Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls will serve as an excellent guide or reference for wall projects such as transportation infrastructure—including roadways, bridges, retaining walls, and earth slopes—that are in dire need of repair and replacement in the U.S. and abroad. Covers both GRS and GMSE (MSE with geosynthetics as reinforcement); with much greater emphasis on GRS walls Showcases reinforcing mechanisms, engineering behavior, and design concepts of GRS and includes many step-by-step design examples Features information on typical construction procedures and general construction guidelines Includes hundreds of line drawings and photos Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Walls is an important book for practicing geotechnical engineers and structural engineers, as well as for advanced students of civil, structural, and geotechnical engineering.
Field Monitoring of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls to Investigate Secondary Reinforcement Effects
Author: Yan JiangPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 75
Book Description
Mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls have been commonly used in highway construction. AASHTO (2007) has detailed design procedures for such a wall system. In the current AASHTO design, only primary reinforcements are used in relatively large spacing (commonly 2 feet), which requires higher connection strength between reinforcements and wall facing. Large spacing between reinforcements may also increase the chances of wall facing bulging and construction-related problems. To alleviate such problems, the use of secondary reinforcements installed between primary reinforcements was proposed. The use of secondary reinforcements could (1) reduce the required connection load for primary reinforcement, (2) increase the internal stability by secondary reinforcement, (3) improve the compaction near the wall facing, and (4) mitigate the down-drag behind the wall facing. However, this idea was not verified in practice. To improve the understanding of the performance of MSE walls with secondary reinforcement and verify its benefits in practice, three MSE wall sections reinforced with geogrids were constructed and monitored in the field: (1) an MSE wall section with uniaxial geogrids as primary and secondary reinforcements, (2) an MSE wall section with uniaxial geogrids as primary reinforcements and with biaxial geogrids as secondary reinforcements, and (3) an MSE wall section with uniaxial geogrids as primary reinforcements only (i.e., the control section). Earth pressure cells, inclinometer pipes and a probe, and foil-type strain gauges were used in these three test wall sections to measure the vertical and lateral earth pressures, lateral wall facing deflections, and strains of primary and secondary geogrids, respectively. The measured results (i.e., the wall facing deflections, the vertical and horizontal earth pressures, and the strains of geogrids) were compared with those calculated using AASHTO (2007). Based on the analysis of the field test results, major conclusions can be drawn in the following: (1) the secondary reinforcements reduced the wall facing deflections as compared with those in the control section; (2) the measured vertical earth pressures were close to the computed trapezoid stresses and increased with the construction of the wall; (3) the distribution of the measured lateral earth pressures in the control section linearly increased with depth, while the distributions of the measured lateral earth pressures in the sections with secondary reinforcements were approximately uniform with depth; (4) the measured tensile strains at the connection in all sections were small; and (5) secondary reinforcements reduced the maximum tensile strains in the primary geogrids.