Author: A. B. Jr BlairPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
Effect of Tail-fin Span on Stability and Control Characteristics of a Canard-controlled Missile at Supersonic Mach Numbers
Author: A. B. Jr BlairEffect on Tail-fin Span on Stability and Control Characteristics of a Canard-controlled Missile at Supersonic Mach Numbers
Author: A. B. BlairPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics, Supersonic
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
NASA Technical Paper
Author: Vortex Flows at Supersonic Speeds
Author: Richard M. WoodPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics, Supersonic
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Supersonic Stability and Control Characteristics of a Cruciform Missile Model with Delta Wings and Aft Tail Fin Control
Author: Supersonic Stability and Control Characteristics of a Cruciform Missile Model with Delta Wings and Aft Tail Fin Controls
Author: William A. CorlettPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics, Supersonic
Languages : en
Pages : 124
Book Description
Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports
Author: NASA Technical Memorandum
Author: NASA Scientific and Technical Publications
Author: The 2002 Version of the Aeroprediction Code
Author: Frankie Gale MoorePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
A new version of the aeroprediction code (APC), the AP02, has been developed to address the requirements arising from advanced weapon concepts. The AP02 was formed by adding significant new technology and several productivity improvements to the previous version of the APC, the AP98. New technology added included 6 and 8 fin aerodynamics, improved nonlinear aerodynamics, improved pitch damping predictions, improved power-on base drag estimates, base-bleed effect on base drag estimation, improved axial force of nonaxisymmetric bodies and trailing-edge flap capability. Other improvements and productivity enhancements include an aerodynamic smoother, ballistic and three degree-of-freedom simulation modules as well as refinements for the pre- and post-processor for inputs and outputs of the AP02. Comparison of the predicted aerodynamics of the AP02 to AP98 and experimental data showed the AP02 to be slightly better than the AP98 in most cases that both codes would handle. However, due to the additional new technology incorporated into the AP02, many new options are available in the AP02 that are not available in the AP98. Therefore, the AP02 is more robust and, on average, is slightly more accurate than the AP98 in predicting aerodynamics of weapons.