Author: Publisher:
ISBN: 9780732600136
Category : Traffic safety
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Effect of Right Turn Phases at Signalised Intersections: Safety performance
Author: Publisher:
ISBN: 9780732600136
Category : Traffic safety
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Effect of Right Turn Phases at Signalised Intersections. Part 1: Safety Performance. General Report
Author: Bill BuiThe Effect of Right-turn-on Red on Traffic Performance and Accidents at Signalized Intersections
Author: James C. RayPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Right turn on red
Languages : en
Pages : 86
Book Description
Effect of Right Turn Phases at Signalised Intersections: Mobility performance
Author: Publisher:
ISBN: 9780732600143
Category : Traffic safety
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Signalized Intersections
Author: Lee August RodegerdtsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 376
Book Description
This guide provides a single, comprehensive document with methods for evaluating the safety and operations of signalized intersections and tools to remedy deficiencies. The treatments in this guide range from low-cost measures such as improvements to signal timing and signage, to high-cost measures such as intersection reconstruction or grade separation. Topics covered include fundamental principles of user needs, geometric design, and traffic design and operation; safety and operational analysis techniques; and a wide variety of treatments to address existing or projected problems, including individual movements and approaches, pedestrian and bicycle treatments, and corridor techniques. It also covers alternative intersection forms that improve intersection performance through the use of indirect left turns and other treatments. Each treatment includes a discussion of safety, operational performance, multimodal issues, and physical and economic factors that the practitioner should consider. Although the guide focuses primarily on high-volume signalized intersections, many treatments are applicable for lower volume intersections as well. The information contained in this guide is based on the latest research available on treatments and best practices in use by jurisdictions across the United States. Additional resources and references are highlighted for the student, practitioner, researcher, or decisionmaker who wishes to learn more about a particular subject.
Traffic Signal Timing Manual
Author: U.s. Department of TransportationPublisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781508557173
Category : Transportation
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Book Description
This report serves as a comprehensive guide to traffic signal timing and documents the tasks completed in association with its development. The focus of this document is on traffic signal control principles, practices, and procedures. It describes the relationship between traffic signal timing and transportation policy and addresses maintenance and operations of traffic signals. It represents a synthesis of traffic signal timing concepts and their application and focuses on the use of detection, related timing parameters, and resulting effects to users at the intersection. It discusses advanced topics briefly to raise awareness related to their use and application. The purpose of the Signal Timing Manual is to provide direction and guidance to managers, supervisors, and practitioners based on sound practice to proactively and comprehensively improve signal timing. The outcome of properly training staff and proactively operating and maintaining traffic signals is signal timing that reduces congestion and fuel consumption ultimately improving our quality of life and the air we breathe. This manual provides an easy-to-use concise, practical and modular guide on signal timing. The elements of signal timing from policy and funding considerations to timing plan development, assessment, and maintenance are covered in the manual. The manual is the culmination of research into practices across North America and serves as a reference for a range of practitioners, from those involved in the day to day management, operation and maintenance of traffic signals to those that plan, design, operate and maintain these systems.
Impacts on Safety of Left-turn Treatment at High Speed Signalized Intersections
Author: T. H. MazePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Left-turn lanes
Languages : en
Pages : 94
Book Description
Left-turning traffic is a major source of conflicts at intersections. Though an average of only 10% to 15% of all approach traffic turns left, these vehicles are involved in approximately 45% of all accidents. This report presents the results of research conducted to develop models which estimate approach accident rates at high speed signalized intersections. The objective of the research was to quantify the relationship between traffic and intersection characteristics, and accident potential of different left turn treatments. Geometric, turning movement counts, and traffic signal phasing data were collected at 100 intersections in Iowa using a questionnaire sent to municipalities. Not all questionnaires resulted in complete data and ultimately complete data were derived for 63 intersections providing a database of 248 approaches. Accident data for the same approaches were obtained from the Iowa Department of Transportation Accident Location and Analysis System (ALAS). Regression models were developed for two different dependent variables: 1) the ratio of the number of left turn accidents per approach to million left turning vehicles per approach, and 2) the ratio of accidents per approach to million traffic movements per approach. A number of regression models were developed for both dependent variables. One model using each dependent variable was developed for intersections with low, medium, and high left turning traffic volumes. As expected, the research indicates that protected left turn phasing has a lower accident potential than protected/permitted or permitted phasing. Left turn lanes and multiple lane approaches are beneficial for reducing accident rates, while raised medians increase the likelihood of accidents. Signals that are part of a signal system tend to have lower accident rates than isolated signals. The resulting regression models may be used to determine the likely impact of various left turn treatments on intersection accident rates. When designing an intersection approach, a traffic engineer may use the models to estimate the accident rate reduction as a result of improved lane configurations and left turn treatments. The safety benefits may then be compared to any costs associated with operational effects to the intersection (i.e., increased delay) to determine the benefits and costs of making intersection safety improvements.
Safety Performance of Median U-turn Intersections
Author: Jonathan James KayPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic dissertations
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The use of alternative intersection designs can provide both safety and operational benefits for road users at potentially lower costs when implemented in the appropriate setting. The Federal Highway Administration has previously recognized a subset of alternative intersections designs broadly referred to as "reduced left-turn conflict intersections" as a proven safety countermeasure that have been shown to decrease the risk of potentially severe crash types by reducing conflict points through the use of indirect left-turn movements. Median U-turn intersections (also referred to as "Michigan lefts" or "boulevard turnarounds") are one such alterative design that accommodates indirect left-turn movements via directional U-turn crossovers located within the median along one or both of the intersecting roadways. Michigan has long been a pioneer in the implementation of median U-turns along urban and suburban divided boulevards, with initial installations dating back several decades. Additionally, various indirect left-turn configurations have been implemented along rural highways and frontage roads for urban freeways.While prior work has consistently demonstrated that median U-turn intersection designs represent an effective countermeasure that can improve operational performance and reduce the frequency of severe crash types when implemented in the appropriate context, much of the extant research is outdated and several important areas of investigation remain unexplored. This includes defining the appropriate crash influence area, the impacts of pre-conversion characteristics, impacts to pedestrian and bicycle collisions, and evaluating crashes pre/post conversion (e.g., longitudinal panel data) compared to a purely cross-sectional evaluation. To address these and other knowledge gaps, research was performed to quantify the safety performance characteristics and develop analytical tools related to the utilization of median U-turn intersections. Historical traffic crash data were collected for signalized and unsignalized intersections in Michigan where left-turns are accommodated by a median U-turn design. To allow for comparison of the performance between the median U-turn and traditional designs, data were also collected for a sample of reference intersections (divided and undivided) where conventional direct left-turn movements were maintained. A novel approach was developed to define the safety performance influence area of a median U-turn intersection, which subsequently improved the method of identifying and collecting target crash data. Utilizing the traffic crash data, a series of analyses were performed to identify the differences between conventional and median U-turn intersections, and to also identify the differences in safety performance between various median U-turn design characteristics. The analyses compared crash rates, types, severity distributions, and severe injury collision patterns, and included development of series of safety performance functions and crash modification factors. The results were then generalized into a series of recommendations for roadway agencies considering future implementation of median U-turn intersections, including specific design recommendations intended to improve safety performance for all road users.Ultimately, it was concluded that median U-turn designs represent an effective safety countermeasure to target the reduction of severe crash types for both unsignalized and signalized intersections. While there are some potential tradeoffs with respect to non-injury crash frequencies for specific pre-conversion configurations, the use of these indirect left-turn intersection designs is consistent with the Safe System approach adopted by the United States Department of Transportation within the National Roadway Safety Strategy. Unsignalized median U-turn intersections offer superior fatal and injury crash performance compared to conventional unsignalized intersections. The removal of the crossing conflict points at unsignalized median U-turn designs (which include a closed median at the intersection) essentially eliminates the pattern of severe head on left-turn and angle collisions occurring within conventional intersections. However, it is important to recognize that non-injury crashes were shown to increase when converting a conventional unsignalized intersection to a median U-turn at locations with an existing median on the major roadway.Signalized median U-turn intersections offer superior safety performance for both injury and non-injury crashes compared to conventional signalized intersections along undivided roadways. However, the comparison of median U-turns locations to conventional divided signalized intersections was limited by a lack of reference sites with comparable traffic volumes. Annual average frequencies of severe pedestrian and bicycle crashes were similar between the signalized median U-turn and conventional undivided sites. Finally, several design features of signalized median U-turn intersections were identified as having a significant impact on safety performance, including the distance to crossovers from the main intersection, the length of weaving areas, the number of signalized crossovers, and the number of storage lanes.
Safety Impacts of Right Turns Followed by U-turns
Author: Fatih PirincciogluPublisher:
ISBN: 9781109978568
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 131
Book Description
Impacts of separation distance on safety of RTUT movements were investigated by a regression model. The model investigated impacts of U-turn bay locations and the number of lanes on major arterial on separation distance requirements. The model results indicated that U-turn bays located at signalized intersections and greater number of lanes on major arterials increases the minimum separation distance requirements.
Direct and Indirect Effect of the Flashing Yellow Arrow Signal for Left-turn Traffic on Safety at Signalized Intersections
Author: Khamar Salma Chittoor KhaderPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 132
Book Description
develop safety performance functions (for left-turn as well as total number of crashes). The estimated number of left-turn and total number of crashes, had FYA signals not been installed, were then compared to the actual number of left-turn and total number crashes that occurred at the study intersections.Negative Binomial (log-link) distribution was observed to be a better fit to develop safety performance functions than Poisson (log-link) distribution. The results obtained indicate that FYA signals, in general, help reduce left-turn crashes (direct effect) as well as the total number of crashes (indirect effect) and contribute to improved safety at signalized intersections. They do not seem to be suitable for intersections with heavy-traffic volume.