Author: Joel Steven RoehlPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Herbicides
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Drift-reducing Nozzle and Drift-reducing Agent Effects on Herbicide Efficacy
Author: Joel Steven RoehlPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Herbicides
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Book Description
Herbicide Drift Management and Efficacy with Drift Reducing Nozzles and Additives
Author: Adam K. JohnsonSprayer Nozzle, Spray Volume, and Adjuvant Effects on Herbicide Efficacy, Coverage, Retention, and Drift
Author: Bradford Kurt RamsdalePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Herbicides
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Book Description
Water Quality, Carrier Volume and Droplet Size Effects on Herbicide Efficacy and Drift Potential
Author: Barbara HoustonPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Herbicide performance is directly related to the amount of active ingredient that has been deposited on the plant. Hence, spray solution characteristics and application parameters are crucial in determining the efficacy of an herbicide application. To maximize the effectiveness of chemical control, methods to deliver full chemical dose must be utilized: allowing the active ingredient to be readily absorbed once added to the carrier and mitigating off-target movement and low herbicide doses. Water is the most frequently used carrier in herbicide applications. Chemical parameters, such as water hardness and pH, can have a critical role in herbicide performance. It is generally believed that weak acid herbicides, such as glyphosate and 2,4-D, have higher dissociation in higher carrier pH, which leads to decreased uptake into plants. Moreover, increased concentration of hard water cations may have antagonistic effect on weak acid herbicide applications. To overcome the negative effect of water quality on weak acid applications, addition of water conditioning adjuvants is recommended. Carrier volume and droplet size are crucial parameters in application technology that can also impact herbicide performance. Nozzles and their spray characteristics have gone under significant development in past decades to enhance spray potential under a wide range of conditions. Introduction of air inclusion nozzles provided the ability to create larger droplets at the same pressure and flow rate as conventional nozzles, resulting in less drift. Controlling off target movement essentiality decreases the potential for herbicide resistance selection on weeds, as well as injury on sensitive crops. Hence, the objectives of this research were to investigate water quality, carrier volume and droplet size effects on herbicide efficacy and drift potential.
Herbicide Spray Drift
Author: A. G. DexterDrift Control Adjuvant Benchmarking in Agricultural Spray Applications
Author: Kevin PenfieldPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Adjuvant
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Book Description
Drifting of fine droplets during the application of pesticides is an issue of increasing commercial and regulatory importance. Spray drift damages susceptible crops, wastes resources, and results in inconsistent weed control. Several strategies are currently used to mitigate this problem. These include enhanced nozzle technology, improved application techniques, and inclusion of drift control additives in the final tank mix. Elimination of small diameter droplets ("driftable fines") is a key goal. Measurements were made of droplet size distributions of sprayed pesticide formulations containing commercial products representative of the leading drift control technologies, including guar, polyacrylamides, lecithin, and oil/surfactant mixtures. Effects of spray nozzle and pressure were also evaluated. Nozzle technology plays a large role in determining the spray droplet size spectrum. However, there is a strong interplay between nozzle design and formulation variables. We found that drift control agents have greater impact on spray from flat fan nozzles. Also, the ranking of adjuvants depends on the nozzle technology in use: for glyphosate/ammonium sulfate solutions, polymers were more effective in reducing fines from a flat fan nozzle, while surfactant-based products were marginally superior when an air induction nozzle was used. The regulatory community is currently focused on mitigating the generation of small droplets. However, the generation of oversized droplets also effects spray efficacy. The impact of drift control agents on the breadth of the droplet size spectrum is an aspect of drift control which is often overlooked. We found that emulsion-based products tighten the droplet size distribution, while the polymer-based products shift the mean droplet diameter up, broadening the distribution in the process: while the latter effect may earn better ratings from regulatory agencies concerned exclusively with spray drift mitigation, it may be less helpful in enhancing application efficacy.
Effects of Tank Contamination and Impact of Drift-reducing Agents on Weed Control in Response to Dicamba Applications
Author: Milos ZaricPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 110
Book Description
Availability of dicamba-tolerant (DT) crops from 2017 provided farmers with additional herbicides for weed control management in row crops. However, the technology alike this one has concerns regarding dicamba off-target movement (OTM) causing undesirable effects on sensitive vegetation. Even though dicamba has high water solubility OTM that has often been overlooked when it comes to unintended crop exposure is dicamba tank contamination. Considering the complexity of spraying equipment soybean response may be expected even when small amounts of residues are left in the spray equipment. Typically, the same field spray equipment is used to perform herbicide application through growing season there is a limited knowledge how various postemergence (POST) programs impacts soybean response when found in scenario with dicamba tank contamination and requires additional research. Furthermore, as one way to mitigate OTM potential release of DT crops was followed with registration of various agents also known as drift-reducing agents (DRAs). Increased awareness of both growers and commercial applicators to reduce unintended adjacent crops injury use of labeled DRAs in combination with drift-reduction nozzles represent common practice. Exposure of sensitive crops to sublethal doses of dicamba has been well documented over several years; however, there is limited information available how combination with commonly used DRA's may impact application process and weed control. Considering limitations on available literature the main objective of this research were: 1) evaluate response of non-DT soybean variety when exposed to commonly applied POST herbicide program in combination without or with dicamba as tank-contaminant and 2) evaluate impact of DRAs on weed control in response to dicamba applications. The results of this research expanded knowledge and will help in education in the future management decisions about potential implications associated with common mitigation techniques used with dicamba application as well as helped with understanding how various POST herbicide program affect soybean response.
Effect of Different Nozzle Types on Drift and Efficacy of Roundup Ultra
Author: Elizabeth J. JonesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Herbicides
Languages : en
Pages : 20
Book Description
Author: J. Maybank
Author: