Author: United States. Chief of Naval Education and Training
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 279
Book Description
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Realignment of Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida
Author: United States. Chief of Naval Education and Training
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 279
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 279
Book Description
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Realignment of E-2 Squadrons from Naval Air Station (NAS) Miramar
Author: United States. Navy Department
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Air bases
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Realignment of F/A-18 Aircraft and Operational Functions from Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida, to Other East Coast Installations; Appendix Volume
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 516
Book Description
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1669, as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), the Department of the Navy announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of the realignment of F/A-18 aircraft and their associated personnel to Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana, located in Virginia Beach. Virginia. This action is being conducted in accordance with the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-510), as implemented during 1995. In accordance with congressional direction implementing the 1995 recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (BRAC 95) the Navy will close NAS Cecil Field, Florida, and realign F/A-18 aircraft, personnel, and ancillary activities associated with the existing F/A-18 aircraft, personnel, and ancillary activities associated with the existing F/A-18 missions.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 516
Book Description
Pursuant to Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1669, as implemented by the Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), the Department of the Navy announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental consequences of the realignment of F/A-18 aircraft and their associated personnel to Naval Air Station (NAS) Oceana, located in Virginia Beach. Virginia. This action is being conducted in accordance with the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-510), as implemented during 1995. In accordance with congressional direction implementing the 1995 recommendations of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (BRAC 95) the Navy will close NAS Cecil Field, Florida, and realign F/A-18 aircraft, personnel, and ancillary activities associated with the existing F/A-18 aircraft, personnel, and ancillary activities associated with the existing F/A-18 missions.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Realignment of F/A-18 Aircraft and Operational Functions from Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida, to Other East Coast Installations
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1036
Book Description
This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) addresses the environmental issues associated with the realignment of F/A-18 aircraft (i.e., fleet squadrons and the Fleet Replacement Squadron FRS) and operational functions from Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida, which is scheduled to close, to other Navy and Marine Corps air stations on the East Coast. This proposed realignment is associated with the Navy's implementation of the 1995 mandated list of realignments prepared by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. The proposed action consists of the transfer of 11 F/A-18 fleet squadrons (132 aircraft) and the FRS (48 aircraft) (180 total aircraft) from NAS Cecil Field. The DEIS assesses five reasonable alternative realignment scenarios (ARSs) for the transfer of F/A-18 aircraft and personnel: ARS 1: Realignment of 11 F/A-18 fleet squadrons (132 aircraft) and the F/A- 18 FRS (48 aircraft) (180 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana, Virginia Beach, Virginia; ARS 2: Realignment of two F/A-18 fleet squadrons (24 aircraft) to Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Beaufort, South Carolina, and realignment of nine fleet squadrons and the FRS (156 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana; ARS 3: Realignment of three F/A-18 fleet squadrons (36 aircraft) to MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina, and realignment of eight fleet squadrons and the FRS (144 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana; ARS 4: Realignment of five F/A-18 fleet squadrons (60 aircraft) to MCAS Beaufort; and realignment of six fleet squadrons and the FRS (120 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana; and ARS 5: Realignment of five F/A-18 fleet squadrons (60 aircraft) to MCAS Cherry Point and realignment of six fleet squadrons and the FRS (120 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1036
Book Description
This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) addresses the environmental issues associated with the realignment of F/A-18 aircraft (i.e., fleet squadrons and the Fleet Replacement Squadron FRS) and operational functions from Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida, which is scheduled to close, to other Navy and Marine Corps air stations on the East Coast. This proposed realignment is associated with the Navy's implementation of the 1995 mandated list of realignments prepared by the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission. The proposed action consists of the transfer of 11 F/A-18 fleet squadrons (132 aircraft) and the FRS (48 aircraft) (180 total aircraft) from NAS Cecil Field. The DEIS assesses five reasonable alternative realignment scenarios (ARSs) for the transfer of F/A-18 aircraft and personnel: ARS 1: Realignment of 11 F/A-18 fleet squadrons (132 aircraft) and the F/A- 18 FRS (48 aircraft) (180 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana, Virginia Beach, Virginia; ARS 2: Realignment of two F/A-18 fleet squadrons (24 aircraft) to Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) Beaufort, South Carolina, and realignment of nine fleet squadrons and the FRS (156 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana; ARS 3: Realignment of three F/A-18 fleet squadrons (36 aircraft) to MCAS Cherry Point, North Carolina, and realignment of eight fleet squadrons and the FRS (144 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana; ARS 4: Realignment of five F/A-18 fleet squadrons (60 aircraft) to MCAS Beaufort; and realignment of six fleet squadrons and the FRS (120 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana; and ARS 5: Realignment of five F/A-18 fleet squadrons (60 aircraft) to MCAS Cherry Point and realignment of six fleet squadrons and the FRS (120 total aircraft) to NAS Oceana.
אגלי טל
Realignment of Naval Air Station, Pensacola
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Realignment of E-2 Squadrons from Naval Air Station (NAS) Miramar
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 271
Book Description
The purpose of the proposed action is to relocate four E-2 aircraft squadrons and related support personnel, equipment, and functions from NAS Miramar to one of three alternative naval bases in California. The proposed action includes siting 16 E-2 aircraft, relocating 988 associated personnel and their families, and expanding or constructing facilities to support aircraft and personnel, and to provide associated training functions. In addition to the increased staffing and equipment levels, there would be an increase in Navy training activities and an increase in flight operations at the receiving installation. The three installations considered for the receiving base are Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS) Point Mugu, Naval Air Station (NAS) Lemoore, and Naval Air Facility (NAF) El Centro. This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts that may result from constructing and/or operating airfield, training, maintenance and personnel support facilities required to carry on the E-2 mission at the three alternative base locations. The EIS analyzes potential environmental impacts of the proposed action on biological resources, hydrology/surface water quality, land use and airspace, socioeconomics, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, aesthetics and visual resources, utilities and services, cultural resources, public health and safety, and hazardous materials and wastes.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 271
Book Description
The purpose of the proposed action is to relocate four E-2 aircraft squadrons and related support personnel, equipment, and functions from NAS Miramar to one of three alternative naval bases in California. The proposed action includes siting 16 E-2 aircraft, relocating 988 associated personnel and their families, and expanding or constructing facilities to support aircraft and personnel, and to provide associated training functions. In addition to the increased staffing and equipment levels, there would be an increase in Navy training activities and an increase in flight operations at the receiving installation. The three installations considered for the receiving base are Naval Air Weapons Station (NAWS) Point Mugu, Naval Air Station (NAS) Lemoore, and Naval Air Facility (NAF) El Centro. This EIS evaluates the potential environmental impacts that may result from constructing and/or operating airfield, training, maintenance and personnel support facilities required to carry on the E-2 mission at the three alternative base locations. The EIS analyzes potential environmental impacts of the proposed action on biological resources, hydrology/surface water quality, land use and airspace, socioeconomics, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise, aesthetics and visual resources, utilities and services, cultural resources, public health and safety, and hazardous materials and wastes.
Final Environmental Impact Statement. Realignment of F/A-18 Aircraft and Operational Functions from Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, Florida, to Other East Coast Installations. Appendix I - Comments and Responses
Author: Naval facilities engineering command norfolk va atlantic div
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 819
Book Description
Appendix I contains all of the public comments received on the Draft ElS. Cormments received during the public hearings are contained in Part A, and comments received via correspondence are contained in Part B. The public hearings were recorded by a court reporter, and the verbal comments received are reproduced below in the verbatim transcript of each speaker. Cpening remarks and presentation of the Draft ElS by Navy representatives have been omitted from the verbatim transcript. Each comment within a speaker's transcript has been marked and sequentially numbered. Responses are marked with corresponding numbers, using the speaker's initials as a prefix. Responses appear on the right-hand side of the page. If a comment warrants a change to the ElS, the reader is referred to the appropriate section of the report.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 819
Book Description
Appendix I contains all of the public comments received on the Draft ElS. Cormments received during the public hearings are contained in Part A, and comments received via correspondence are contained in Part B. The public hearings were recorded by a court reporter, and the verbal comments received are reproduced below in the verbatim transcript of each speaker. Cpening remarks and presentation of the Draft ElS by Navy representatives have been omitted from the verbatim transcript. Each comment within a speaker's transcript has been marked and sequentially numbered. Responses are marked with corresponding numbers, using the speaker's initials as a prefix. Responses appear on the right-hand side of the page. If a comment warrants a change to the ElS, the reader is referred to the appropriate section of the report.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement: Disposal and Reuse of Naval Air Station Cecil Field Jacksonville, Florida
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 651
Book Description
As a result of the 1993 mandates of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (Commission), as approved by Congress pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (commonly referred to as BRAC), Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, located in Duval and Clay counties, Florida, will be closed. The United States Department of the Navy has prepared this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to evaluate the potential environmental effects of disposal and reuse of the station by other entities pursuant to the NAS Cecil Field Final Base Reuse Plan (CFDC 1996), prepared by the Cecil Field Development Commission (CFDC). This DEIS has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations on Implementing NEPA Procedures (40 CFR 1500-1508); OPNAVINST 5090. 1B; and the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Title XXIX of P.L. 101-510) as amended by PL 102-190 and P.L. 102A84.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 651
Book Description
As a result of the 1993 mandates of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Commission (Commission), as approved by Congress pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (commonly referred to as BRAC), Naval Air Station (NAS) Cecil Field, located in Duval and Clay counties, Florida, will be closed. The United States Department of the Navy has prepared this Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to evaluate the potential environmental effects of disposal and reuse of the station by other entities pursuant to the NAS Cecil Field Final Base Reuse Plan (CFDC 1996), prepared by the Cecil Field Development Commission (CFDC). This DEIS has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations on Implementing NEPA Procedures (40 CFR 1500-1508); OPNAVINST 5090. 1B; and the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (Title XXIX of P.L. 101-510) as amended by PL 102-190 and P.L. 102A84.