Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 1248
Book Description
Domestic Telecommunications Common Carrier Policies
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 1248
Book Description
Domestic Telecommunications Common Carrier Policies
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 576
Book Description
Domestic Telecommunicataions Common Carrier Policies
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 834
Book Description
Developing a Domestic Common Carrier Telecommunications Policy
Author: United States. General Accounting OfficePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Domestic Telecommunications Common Carrier Policies
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 1376
Book Description
Domestic Telecommunications Common Carrier Policies
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic books
Languages : en
Pages : 820
Book Description
Developing a Domestic Common Carrier Telecommunications Policy
Author: Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 46
Book Description
The Communications Act of 1934 created the Federal Communications Commission to regulate interstate and foreign common carriers and established the Nation's policy goal of making communications services available to all people of the United States (referred to as the Universal Service Mandate). The carriers have interpreted this mandate to mean that other telecommunications services should cross subsidize local telephone service. To achieve this, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company and the independent telephone companies adopted specific pricing policies and methods of distributing common costs which they assert subsidize the cost of local service and, therefore, widen its availability. The carriers believe that the goal of universal service is in jeopardy and that competition threatens the subsidies to local service. This, in turn, threatens to raise the cost of local service, contrary to the Universal Service Mandate. However, studies conducted by FCC, the industry, and other experts cannot provide a definitive answer on exactly which subsidies exist, how large the subsidies are, and what competition's effect will be. Despite this controversy, industry observers and the carriers agree that the goal of universal service has been satisfied. While only about one-third of the Nation's households had telephone service at the time the act was passed in 1934, 95 percent have it today. Consequently, in evaluating future policy goals the Congress faces the issues of what amount of industry regulation is needed, what type of industry structure should be adopted (monopoly or competitive), and what domestic telecommunications policy goals the Nation should pursue.
Domestic Telecommunications Common Carrier Policies
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Subcommittee on CommunicationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic books
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
Developing a Domestic Common Carrier Telecommunications Policy
Author: U S Government Accountability Office (GPublisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289256852
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Book Description
The Communications Act of 1934 created the Federal Communications Commission to regulate interstate and foreign common carriers and established the Nation's policy goal of making communications services available to all people of the United States (referred to as the Universal Service Mandate). The carriers have interpreted this mandate to mean that other telecommunications services should cross subsidize local telephone service. To achieve this, the American Telephone and Telegraph Company and the independent telephone companies adopted specific pricing policies and methods of distributing common costs which they assert subsidize the cost of local service and, therefore, widen its availability. The carriers believe that the goal of universal service is in jeopardy and that competition threatens the subsidies to local service. This, in turn, threatens to raise the cost of local service, contrary to the Universal Service Mandate. However, studies conducted by FCC, the industry, and other experts cannot provide a definitive answer on exactly which subsidies exist, how large the subsidies are, and what competition's effect will be. Despite this controversy, industry observers and the carriers agree that the goal of universal service has been satisfied. While only about one-third of the Nation's households had telephone service at the time the act was passed in 1934, 95 percent have it today. Consequently, in evaluating future policy goals the Congress faces the issues of what amount of industry regulation is needed, what type of industry structure should be adopted (monopoly or competitive), and what domestic telecommunications policy goals the Nation should pursue.
Report on Domestic Telecommunications Policies
Author: United States. Federal Communications CommissionPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Telecommunication
Languages : en
Pages : 430
Book Description