Determinación y aplicación de la pena de prisión en sentido estricto. Teoría y práctica judicial PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Determinación y aplicación de la pena de prisión en sentido estricto. Teoría y práctica judicial PDF full book. Access full book title Determinación y aplicación de la pena de prisión en sentido estricto. Teoría y práctica judicial by María José Cruz Blanca. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: María José Cruz Blanca Publisher: Dykinson ISBN: 841122581X Category : Law Languages : es Pages : 182
Book Description
Aunque la doctrina penal se ha ocupado intensamente tanto del análisis de la dogmática del delito como de las teorías de la pena tratando de dotar al justiciable de las máximas garantías, el desarrollo teórico alcanzado en el estudio de las consecuencias jurídicas, en especial en lo referido a su individualización judicial, no ha tenido idéntico recorrido analítico pese a la relevancia de las cuestiones que se suscitan. Mientras la Teoría Jurídica del Delito, cuya finalidad es la elaboración de los presupuestos dogmáticos de la punibilidad (antijuridicidad y culpabilidad), ha ido a lo largo de los años adquiriendo un gran desarrollo, no ha sido así respecto de la Teoría de la Individualización de la Pena, es decir, respecto del cuánto o, en su caso, la clase de pena a imponer. Este trabajo se dedica a la determinación y aplicación de la pena de prisión en particular, a la que se atribuyen efectos perturbadores e, incluso, devastadores para quien la sufre. Sus consecuencias sociales, familiares, personales y laborales sobradamente conocidas, permiten afirmar que su uso debería ser limitado en la medida en que sea necesario para el logro de los legítimos fines del Derecho penal. La monografía contiene dos partes de distinta naturaleza. La primera de ellas, eminentemente teórica, se plantea la dogmática del origen, del cómo y del porqué de la determinación de la pena. En una segunda parte, de naturaleza más aplicativa, se abordará la regulación positiva de la determinación de la pena de prisión prevista en los arts. 61 a 79 del código penal, y la forma de proceder de los órganos judiciales en la práctica, mediante el análisis de una abundante jurisprudencia.María José Cruz Blanca es Doctora en Derecho por la Universidad de Granada (1999), Profesora Titular de Derecho penal de la Universidad de Jaén, y miembro del Grupo de Investigación “Derecho penal, Criminología, Democracia y Derechos Fundamentales” (SEJ-428). Ha participado en distintos proyectos de investigación de ámbito nacional e internacional y es autora de numerosas publicaciones de la parte general y especial del Derecho penal, destacando entre sus líneas de investigación temas relacionados con el Derecho penal de menores, Tenencia ilícita de armas, corrupción en el ámbito de la Administración de Justicia y delitos electorales, entre otros muchos. Así mismo, es coordinadora de la colección “IA, Robots, y Bioderecho” de la editorial Dykinson. La autora es miembro del Grupo de Estudios de Política Criminal (GEPC), de la Fundación Internacional de Ciencias Penales (FICP), de la Asociación de Profesorado de Derecho penal de las Universidades Españolas (ASOCPDP) y de la Associazione florentina “Centro Studi e Ricerche sull´infanzia e l´adolescenza” (CONTACT).
Author: María José Cruz Blanca Publisher: Dykinson ISBN: 841122581X Category : Law Languages : es Pages : 182
Book Description
Aunque la doctrina penal se ha ocupado intensamente tanto del análisis de la dogmática del delito como de las teorías de la pena tratando de dotar al justiciable de las máximas garantías, el desarrollo teórico alcanzado en el estudio de las consecuencias jurídicas, en especial en lo referido a su individualización judicial, no ha tenido idéntico recorrido analítico pese a la relevancia de las cuestiones que se suscitan. Mientras la Teoría Jurídica del Delito, cuya finalidad es la elaboración de los presupuestos dogmáticos de la punibilidad (antijuridicidad y culpabilidad), ha ido a lo largo de los años adquiriendo un gran desarrollo, no ha sido así respecto de la Teoría de la Individualización de la Pena, es decir, respecto del cuánto o, en su caso, la clase de pena a imponer. Este trabajo se dedica a la determinación y aplicación de la pena de prisión en particular, a la que se atribuyen efectos perturbadores e, incluso, devastadores para quien la sufre. Sus consecuencias sociales, familiares, personales y laborales sobradamente conocidas, permiten afirmar que su uso debería ser limitado en la medida en que sea necesario para el logro de los legítimos fines del Derecho penal. La monografía contiene dos partes de distinta naturaleza. La primera de ellas, eminentemente teórica, se plantea la dogmática del origen, del cómo y del porqué de la determinación de la pena. En una segunda parte, de naturaleza más aplicativa, se abordará la regulación positiva de la determinación de la pena de prisión prevista en los arts. 61 a 79 del código penal, y la forma de proceder de los órganos judiciales en la práctica, mediante el análisis de una abundante jurisprudencia.María José Cruz Blanca es Doctora en Derecho por la Universidad de Granada (1999), Profesora Titular de Derecho penal de la Universidad de Jaén, y miembro del Grupo de Investigación “Derecho penal, Criminología, Democracia y Derechos Fundamentales” (SEJ-428). Ha participado en distintos proyectos de investigación de ámbito nacional e internacional y es autora de numerosas publicaciones de la parte general y especial del Derecho penal, destacando entre sus líneas de investigación temas relacionados con el Derecho penal de menores, Tenencia ilícita de armas, corrupción en el ámbito de la Administración de Justicia y delitos electorales, entre otros muchos. Así mismo, es coordinadora de la colección “IA, Robots, y Bioderecho” de la editorial Dykinson. La autora es miembro del Grupo de Estudios de Política Criminal (GEPC), de la Fundación Internacional de Ciencias Penales (FICP), de la Asociación de Profesorado de Derecho penal de las Universidades Españolas (ASOCPDP) y de la Associazione florentina “Centro Studi e Ricerche sull´infanzia e l´adolescenza” (CONTACT).
Author: Carlos E. Alchourron Publisher: Springer ISBN: Category : Business & Economics Languages : en Pages : 234
Book Description
In consequence of an increased interest in problems relating to human action, normative concepts have been much discussed by philosophers and logicians in the past twenty years. Deontic logic, which deals with the normative use of language and such normative concepts as obligation, prohibition and permission, has become one of the most intensively cultivated areas of formal logic. Important investigations have been carried out which have shed considerable light on various aspects of the normative phenomenon and a great number of different systems of deontic logic have been developed. This progressive proliferation of deontic logics not only shows the great interest of logicians in normative discourse, but also reflects a basic perplexity: the lack of suitable criteria of adequacy for the interpretation of deontic calculi and hence difficulty in decid ing which of the systems provides the best reconstruction of the underlying normative concepts and can therefore be applied with the most fruitful results. This difficulty is so great that some authors have even expressed doubts about the practical usefulness of deontic logic. One of the sources of this perplexity lies in the absence of a well established pre-analytical basis for formal studies. It is sometimes even uncertain what the intuitive notions are that deontic logicians intend to reconstruct. In talking about obligations, prohibitions and permissions, they usually have in mind moral norms. But the choice of moral norm as an explicandum for the construction of a logic of norms has several disadvantages.
Author: Shaun Gallagher Publisher: Routledge ISBN: 1136458166 Category : Philosophy Languages : en Pages : 279
Book Description
The Phenomenological Mind is the first book to properly introduce fundamental questions about the mind from the perspective of phenomenology. Key questions and topics covered include: • what is phenomenology? • naturalizing phenomenology and the cognitive sciences • phenomenology and consciousness • consciousness and self-consciousness • time and consciousness • intentionality • the embodied mind • action • knowledge of other minds • situated and extended minds • phenomenology and personal identity. This second edition includes a new preface, and revised and improved chapters. Also included are helpful features such as chapter summaries, guides to further reading, and a glossary, making The Phenomenological Mind an ideal introduction to key concepts in phenomenology, cognitive science and philosophy of mind.
Author: Vernon L. Quinsey Publisher: Washington, DC : American Psychological Association ISBN: 9781557984951 Category : Psychology Languages : en Pages : 356
Book Description
The primary focus of this book is on criminal violence of both mentally disordered and criminal inmates, whose histories of criminal violence raise serious societal concerns about the commission of future acts of violence. It is difficult for legal experts, psychologists, and policy makers to make decisions that strike the proper balance between an offender's civil liberties and community safety. Such a balance requires an accurate assessment of the likelihood that an individual offender will commit a new violent or sexual offense. On the basis of their research on mentally disordered offenders, sex offenders, fire setters, and psychopathic offenders, the authors have devised an actuarial assessment instrument, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. The authors argue that risk management can be improved by combining what is already known about predicting violence, clinical decision making, and program evaluation. They conclude that the results of their applied research have implications for our understanding of the etiology of violent criminal behavior.
Author: Barbara J. Lausche Publisher: IUCN ISBN: 2831712459 Category : Law Languages : en Pages : 400
Book Description
The central aim of this publication is to consider the key elements of a modern, comprehensive, and effective legal framework for successful management of protected areas. They provide practical guidance for all those involved in developing, improving, or reviewing national legislation on protected areas, be they legal drafters and practitioners, protected area managers, interested NGOs, or scholars. These guidelines include fifteen case studies, eight dealing with the protected area legislation of individual countries and six cases dealing with specific sites providing fundamental solutions that stand the test of time.
Author: United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General Publisher: ISBN: Category : Government publications Languages : en Pages : 728
Book Description
This report considers the biological and behavioral mechanisms that may underlie the pathogenicity of tobacco smoke. Many Surgeon General's reports have considered research findings on mechanisms in assessing the biological plausibility of associations observed in epidemiologic studies. Mechanisms of disease are important because they may provide plausibility, which is one of the guideline criteria for assessing evidence on causation. This report specifically reviews the evidence on the potential mechanisms by which smoking causes diseases and considers whether a mechanism is likely to be operative in the production of human disease by tobacco smoke. This evidence is relevant to understanding how smoking causes disease, to identifying those who may be particularly susceptible, and to assessing the potential risks of tobacco products.
Author: Francis T. Cullen Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub ISBN: 9781478262503 Category : Social Science Languages : en Pages : 68
Book Description
A theme that has persisted throughout the history of American corrections is that efforts should be made to reform offenders. In particular, at the beginning of the 1900s, the rehabilitative ideal was enthusiastically trumpeted and helped to direct the renovation of the correctional system (e.g., implementation of indeterminate sentencing, parole, probation, a separate juvenile justice system). For the next seven decades, offender treatment reigned as the dominant correctional philosophy. Then, in the early 1970s, rehabilitation suffered a precipitous reversal of fortune. The larger disruptions in American society in this era prompted a general critique of the “state run” criminal justice system. Rehabilitation was blamed by liberals for allowing the state to act coercively against offenders, and was blamed by conservatives for allowing the state to act leniently toward offenders. In this context, the death knell of rehabilitation was seemingly sounded by Robert Martinson's (1974b) influential “nothing works” essay, which reported that few treatment programs reduced recidivism. This review of evaluation studies gave legitimacy to the antitreatment sentiments of the day; it ostensibly “proved” what everyone “already knew”: Rehabilitation did not work. In the subsequent quarter century, a growing revisionist movement has questioned Martinson's portrayal of the empirical status of the effectiveness of treatment interventions. Through painstaking literature reviews, these revisionist scholars have shown that many correctional treatment programs are effective in decreasing recidivism. More recently, they have undertaken more sophisticated quantitative syntheses of an increasing body of evaluation studies through a technique called “meta-analysis.” These meta-analyses reveal that across evaluation studies, the recidivism rate is, on average, 10 percentage points lower for the treatment group than for the control group. However, this research has also suggested that some correctional interventions have no effect on offender criminality (e.g., punishment-oriented programs), while others achieve substantial reductions in recidivism (i.e., approximately 25 percent). This variation in program success has led to a search for those “principles” that distinguish effective treatment interventions from ineffective ones. There is theoretical and empirical support for the conclusion that the rehabilitation programs that achieve the greatest reductions in recidivism use cognitive-behavioral treatments, target known predictors of crime for change, and intervene mainly with high-risk offenders. “Multisystemic treatment” is a concrete example of an effective program that largely conforms to these principles. In the time ahead, it would appear prudent that correctional policy and practice be “evidence based.” Knowledgeable about the extant research, policymakers would embrace the view that rehabilitation programs, informed by the principles of effective intervention, can “work” to reduce recidivism and thus can help foster public safety. By reaffirming rehabilitation, they would also be pursuing a policy that is consistent with public opinion research showing that Americans continue to believe that offender treatment should be an integral goal of the correctional system.
Author: María José Cruz Blanca
Author: María José Cruz Blanca
Author: State of State of Illinois
Author: 
Author: Carlos E. Alchourron
Author: Shaun Gallagher
Author: Vernon L. Quinsey
Author: Guillermo Floris Margadant S.
Author: Barbara J. Lausche
Author: United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General
Author: Francis T. Cullen