Defense Science Board Task Force Report on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense Feasibility PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Defense Science Board Task Force Report on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense Feasibility PDF full book. Access full book title Defense Science Board Task Force Report on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense Feasibility by United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense Publisher: ISBN: Category : Ballistic missile defenses Languages : en Pages : 41
Book Description
The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Task Force focused on defense against regional-level adversary ballistic missiles. It directed the Task Force to consider both technology issues and architectural constructs to accomplish 'Early Intercept' (defined in the TOR as that interval in a ballistic missile's flight between thrust termination and final deployment of warhead(s) and/or countermeasures). In February 2010, the Department of Defense issued a key document that comprehensively outlined the objective of the Nation's ballistic missile defense program (Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report, February 2010). This document clearly spelled out the top priority role of regional ballistic missile defense wherein the U.S. committed itself to defend not only our military assets overseas, but also to provide missile defense assistance to our 'allies and partners.' The U.S. has many allies and partners worldwide, so there is a wide range in the difficulty of achieving defensive coverage of their territories. The collection of allies in Europe represents the largest land mass to cover, and the Task Force devoted much of its analytics to this European theater. However, in examining the issues related to EI in the context of the Phased Adaptive Approach (PAA) in Europe (EPAA), the Task Force additionally considered a different kind of 'EI' from that spelled out in the TOR, namely the issues related to using regional forward-based defenses to get an 'early' shot at intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) heading to the U.S. Chapter 1 of this report analyzes the benefits and shortfalls of the EI proposition. As a result of the analyses presented in Chapter 1, certain key attributes of effective Regional Defense became evident, as did some key enablers required to achieve an effective defense. Chapters 2 and 3 review those key attributes and technological enablers, respectively. Overall, we conclude that EI per se is not a particularly useful goal or protocol for design of a regional BMD system. There is often confusion as to what EI means; moreover, it is not fundamental as an attribute of effective ballistic missile defense.
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense Publisher: ISBN: Category : Ballistic missile defenses Languages : en Pages : 41
Book Description
The Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Task Force focused on defense against regional-level adversary ballistic missiles. It directed the Task Force to consider both technology issues and architectural constructs to accomplish 'Early Intercept' (defined in the TOR as that interval in a ballistic missile's flight between thrust termination and final deployment of warhead(s) and/or countermeasures). In February 2010, the Department of Defense issued a key document that comprehensively outlined the objective of the Nation's ballistic missile defense program (Ballistic Missile Defense Review Report, February 2010). This document clearly spelled out the top priority role of regional ballistic missile defense wherein the U.S. committed itself to defend not only our military assets overseas, but also to provide missile defense assistance to our 'allies and partners.' The U.S. has many allies and partners worldwide, so there is a wide range in the difficulty of achieving defensive coverage of their territories. The collection of allies in Europe represents the largest land mass to cover, and the Task Force devoted much of its analytics to this European theater. However, in examining the issues related to EI in the context of the Phased Adaptive Approach (PAA) in Europe (EPAA), the Task Force additionally considered a different kind of 'EI' from that spelled out in the TOR, namely the issues related to using regional forward-based defenses to get an 'early' shot at intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) heading to the U.S. Chapter 1 of this report analyzes the benefits and shortfalls of the EI proposition. As a result of the analyses presented in Chapter 1, certain key attributes of effective Regional Defense became evident, as did some key enablers required to achieve an effective defense. Chapters 2 and 3 review those key attributes and technological enablers, respectively. Overall, we conclude that EI per se is not a particularly useful goal or protocol for design of a regional BMD system. There is often confusion as to what EI means; moreover, it is not fundamental as an attribute of effective ballistic missile defense.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 95
Book Description
This report covers Phase III of the work of the Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Missile Defense. Phase I examined mid-course discrimination. Phase II, a 2002 DSB Summer Study, examined the four issues shown in the chart above. Following completion of the Phase II report, the Director, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) asked the Task Force to examine modeling and simulation (M & S). The Under Secretary Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USDAT & L) concurred. The request was further refined to the five areas shown. After a brief introduction, this report will cover each of the five issues in turn.
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Small Intercontinental Missile Modernization Publisher: ISBN: Category : Intercontinental ballistic missiles Languages : en Pages : 19
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 96
Book Description
This report covers Phase III of the work of the Defense Science Board (DSB) Task Force on Missile Defense. Phase I examined mid- course discrimination. Phase II, a 2002 DSB Summer Study, examined the four issues shown in the chart above. Following completion of the Phase II report, the Director, Missile Defense Agency (MDA) asked the Task Force to examine modeling and simulation (M&S). The Under Secretary Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USDAT&L) concurred. The request was further refined to the five areas shown. After a brief introduction, this report will cover each of the five issues in turn.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Strategic Forces Subcommittee Publisher: ISBN: Category : Ballistic missile defenses Languages : en Pages : 88
Author: United States. Defense Science Board Publisher: ISBN: Category : Offensive (Military science) Languages : en Pages : 93
Book Description
Time critical conventional strike from long standoff ranges into restricted or denied territory has been an operational, policy, and acquisition challenge for a long time. In situations in which time is not a factor and/or in which sufficient U.S. forces are deployed nearby, the U.S. has demonstrated its ability to strike at identified threats effectively. However, in situations in which time is a factor and no nearby forces are present, only two options are currently available-- nuclear intercontinental ballistic missile systems(ICBMs)/submarine/sea-launched ballistic missile systems (SLBMs) or no military action. This report recommends a course of action to ensure that there is an appropriate, effective time critical conventional strike option in place.
Author: National Research Council Publisher: National Academies Press ISBN: 0309216109 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 239
Book Description
The Committee on an Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives set forth to provide an assessment of the feasibility, practicality, and affordability of U.S. boost-phase missile defense compared with that of the U.S. non-boost missile defense when countering short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic missile threats from rogue states to deployed forces of the United States and its allies and defending the territory of the United States against limited ballistic missile attack. To provide a context for this analysis of present and proposed U.S. boost-phase and non-boost missile defense concepts and systems, the committee considered the following to be the missions for ballistic missile defense (BMD): protecting of the U.S. homeland against nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction (WMD); or conventional ballistic missile attacks; protection of U.S. forces, including military bases, logistics, command and control facilities, and deployed forces, including military bases, logistics, and command and control facilities. They also considered deployed forces themselves in theaters of operation against ballistic missile attacks armed with WMD or conventional munitions, and protection of U.S. allies, partners, and host nations against ballistic-missile-delivered WMD and conventional weapons. Consistent with U.S. policy and the congressional tasking, the committee conducted its analysis on the basis that it is not a mission of U.S. BMD systems to defend against large-scale deliberate nuclear attacks by Russia or China. Making Sense of Ballistic Missile Defense: An Assessment of Concepts and Systems for U.S. Boost-Phase Missile Defense in Comparison to Other Alternatives suggests that great care should be taken by the U.S. in ensuring that negotiations on space agreements not adversely impact missile defense effectiveness. This report also explains in further detail the findings of the committee, makes recommendations, and sets guidelines for the future of ballistic missile defense research.
Author: Reuben Steff Publisher: Routledge ISBN: 1317049454 Category : Political Science Languages : en Pages : 239
Book Description
A systematic critical survey of American strategic thinking and the strategic culture in which it is formed. In particular, this book seeks to interrogate the theory and strategy of nuclear deterrence, and its relationship to the concept of missile defence. Drawing widely on the theoretical literature in international relations and strategic studies, it identifies the key groups that have competed over America's nuclear policy post-1945 and examines how the concept of missile defence went through a process of gestation and intellectual contestation, leading to its eventual legitimization in the late 1990s. Steff sheds light on the individuals, groups, institutions and processes that led to the decision by the Bush administration to deploy a national missile defence shield. Additionally, Steff systematically examines the impact deployment had on the calculations of Russia and China. In the process he explains that their reactions under the Bush administration have continued into the Obama era, revealing that a new great power security dilemma has broken out. This, Steff shows, has led to a decline in great power relations as a consequence.
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Science and Technology Issues of Early Intercept Ballistic Missile Defense
Author: 
Author: United States. Defense Science Board. Task Force on Small Intercontinental Missile Modernization
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Strategic Forces Subcommittee
Author: United States. Defense Science Board
Author: National Research Council
Author: Reuben Steff