Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Defense Management PDF full book. Access full book title Defense Management by United States Government Accountability Office. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States Government Accountability Office Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform ISBN: 9781720318071 Category : Languages : en Pages : 36
Book Description
Defense Management: DOD Needs to Demonstrate That Performance-Based Logistics Contracts Are Achieving Expected Benefits
Author: United States Government Accountability Office Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform ISBN: 9781720318071 Category : Languages : en Pages : 36
Book Description
Defense Management: DOD Needs to Demonstrate That Performance-Based Logistics Contracts Are Achieving Expected Benefits
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 23
Book Description
DOD program offices could not demonstrate that they have achieved cost savings or performance improvements through the use of performance-based logistics arrangements. Although DOD guidance on implementing these arrangements states program offices should update their business case analysis based on actual cost and performance data, only 1 of the 15 program offices included in GAO's review had performed such an update consistent with DOD guidance. In the single case where the program office had updated its business case analysis, it determined that the performancebased logistics contract did not result in expected cost savings and the weapon system did not meet established performance requirements. In general, program offices had not updated their business case analysis after entering into a performance-based logistics contract because they assumed that the costs for weapon system maintenance incurred under a fixed-price performance-based logistics contract would always be lower than costs under a more traditional contracting approach and because they lacked reliable cost and performance data needed to validate assumptions used. Furthermore, the Office of the Secretary of Defense has not established procedures to monitor program offices to ensure they follow guidance and update the business case analysis. Additionally, program officials said because of limitations in their own information systems, they typically relied on cost and performance data generated by the contractors' information systems to monitor performance-based logistics contracts. The program offices, however, had not determined whether contractor-provided data were sufficiently reliable to update their business case analysis.
Author: David M. Walker Publisher: DIANE Publishing ISBN: 1437902707 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 42
Book Description
The fed. gov¿t., incl. the DoD, is relying on contractors to carry out many of its missions. Governmentwide spending on contractor services has more than doubled in the last 10 years. DoD has used contractors extensively to support troops deployed abroad; there are about 196,000 contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. While contractors can play an important role in helping agencies accomplish their missions, there have been problems regarding the appropriate role and mgmt. of contractors, particularly at DoD. This testimony highlights the challenges DoD has had in managing its increased reliance on contractors who support deployed troops and who provide logistics support for weapons. Includes recommendations.
Author: Sharon Pickup Publisher: DIANE Publishing ISBN: 1437912516 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 42
Book Description
A report to congressional committees regarding the DoD¿s progress in implementing GAO's recommendations over the last 7 years. During this period of time, GAO issued 637 reports to DoD that included 2,726 recommendations. By law, agencies, including DoD, are required to submit written statements explaining actions taken in response to recommendations that have been made. This report contains the results of an analysis on the implementation status of the 2,726 recommendations made to DoD in reports issued during FY 2001 through 2007. Includes examples of related financial accomplishments reported for the period, based on DoD-related work. Illustrations.
Author: United States Government Accountability Publisher: ISBN: 9781296016128 Category : Languages : en Pages : 26
Book Description
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office Publisher: ISBN: Category : Defense contracts Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
DOD program offices could not demonstrate that they have achieved cost savings or performance improvements through the use of performance-based logistics arrangements. Although DOD guidance on implementing these arrangements states program offices should update their business case analysis based on actual cost and performance data, only 1 of the 15 program offices included in GAO's review had performed such an update consistent with DOD guidance. In the single case where the program office had updated its business case analysis, it determined that the performance based logistics contract did not result in expected cost savings and the weapon system did not meet established performance requirements. In general, program offices had not updated their business case analysis after entering into a performance-based logistics contract because they assumed that the costs for weapon system maintenance incurred under a fixed-price performance-based logistics contract would always be lower than costs under a more traditional contracting approach and because they lacked reliable cost and performance data needed to validate assumptions used. Furthermore, the Office of the Secretary of Defense has not established procedures to monitor program offices to ensure they follow guidance and update the business case analysis. Additionally, program officials said because of limitations in their own information systems, they typically relied on cost and performance data generated by the contractors' information systems to monitor performance-based logistics contracts. The program offices, however, had not determined whether contractor-provided data were sufficiently reliable to update their business case analysis.
Author: United States. Office of Management and Budget. Acquisition Advisory Panel Publisher: ISBN: Category : Electronic government information Languages : en Pages : 474
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Readiness Subcommittee Publisher: ISBN: Category : Business & Economics Languages : en Pages : 126
Author: United States Government Accountability Office
Author: United States Government Accountability Office
Author: 
Author: David M. Walker
Author: Sharon Pickup
Author: 
Author: United States Government Accountability
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Author: United States. Office of Management and Budget. Acquisition Advisory Panel
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Readiness Subcommittee
Author: