Current Research in Law for the Academic Year 1929-1930 PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Current Research in Law for the Academic Year 1929-1930 PDF full book. Access full book title Current Research in Law for the Academic Year 1929-1930 by Johns Hopkins University. Institute of Law. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

Current Research in Law for the Academic Year 1929-1930

Author: Johns Hopkins University. Institute of Law
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 308

Book Description

Current Research in Law for the Academic Year 1929-1930

Author: Johns Hopkins University. Institute of Law
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 308

Book Description

Current Research in Law, for the Academic Year 1929-1930, Based on a Survey Made by the Institute of Law, (Johns Hopkins University)

Author: Elizabeth S. Iddings
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Book Description

Current Research in Law for the Academic Year, 1928/29-1929/30

Author: Marion J. Harron
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 232

Book Description

Current Research in Law for the Academic Year 1928-1929

Author: Johns Hopkins University. Institute of Law
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 240

Book Description

American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science

Author: John Henry Schlegel
Publisher: Univ of North Carolina Press
ISBN: 9780807821794
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 440

Book Description
John Henry Schlegel recovers a largely ignored aspect of American Legal Realism, a movement in legal thought in the 1920's and 1930's that sought to bring the modern notion of empirical science into the study and teaching of law. In this book, he explores individual Realist scholars' efforts to challenge the received notion that the study of law was primarily a matter of learning rules and how to manipulate them. He argues that empirical research was integral to Legal Realism, and he explores why this kind of research did not, finally, become a part of American law school curricula.