Author: Eric P. Polten
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
ISBN: 311081563X
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 308
Book Description
No detailed description available for "Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory".
Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory
Author: Eric P. Polten
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
ISBN: 311081563X
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 308
Book Description
No detailed description available for "Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory".
Publisher: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG
ISBN: 311081563X
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 308
Book Description
No detailed description available for "Critique of the Psycho-Physical Identity Theory".
The Philosophical Review
Author: Jacob Gould Schurman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic journals
Languages : en
Pages : 598
Book Description
An international journal of general philosophy.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic journals
Languages : en
Pages : 598
Book Description
An international journal of general philosophy.
Religious Books, 1876-1982
International Philosophical Quarterly
'American Book Publishing Record' Cumulative
Author: R. R. Bowker LLC
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 1246
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 1246
Book Description
Monographic Series
Author: Library of Congress
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Monographic series
Languages : en
Pages : 720
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Monographic series
Languages : en
Pages : 720
Book Description
Revue internationale de philosophie
Psychology Book Guide
Books in Series in the United States
Consciousness and the Brain
Author: Gordon Globus
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1468421964
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 364
Book Description
The relationship of consciousness to brain, which Schopenhauer grandly referred to as the "world knot," remains an unsolved problem within both philosophy and science. The central focus in what follows is the relevance of science---from psychoanalysis to neurophysiology and quantum physics-to the mind-brain puzzle. Many would argue that we have advanced little since the age of the Greek philosophers, and that the extraordinary accumulation of neuroscientific knowledge in this century has helped not at all. Increas ingly, philosophers and scientists have tended to go their separate ways in considering the issues, since they tend to differ in the questions that they ask, the data and ideas which are provided for consideration, their methods for answering these questions, and criteria for judging the acceptability of an answer. But it is our conviction that philosophers and scientists can usefully interchange, at least to the extent that they provide co~straints upon each other's preferred strategies, and it may prove possible for more substantive progress to be made. Philosophers have said some rather naive things by ignoring the extraordinary advances in the neurosciences in the twentieth century. The skull is not filled with green cheese! On the other hand, the arrogance of many scientists toward philosophy and their faith in the scientific method is equally naive. Scientists clearly have much to learn from philosophy as an intellectual discipline.
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1468421964
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 364
Book Description
The relationship of consciousness to brain, which Schopenhauer grandly referred to as the "world knot," remains an unsolved problem within both philosophy and science. The central focus in what follows is the relevance of science---from psychoanalysis to neurophysiology and quantum physics-to the mind-brain puzzle. Many would argue that we have advanced little since the age of the Greek philosophers, and that the extraordinary accumulation of neuroscientific knowledge in this century has helped not at all. Increas ingly, philosophers and scientists have tended to go their separate ways in considering the issues, since they tend to differ in the questions that they ask, the data and ideas which are provided for consideration, their methods for answering these questions, and criteria for judging the acceptability of an answer. But it is our conviction that philosophers and scientists can usefully interchange, at least to the extent that they provide co~straints upon each other's preferred strategies, and it may prove possible for more substantive progress to be made. Philosophers have said some rather naive things by ignoring the extraordinary advances in the neurosciences in the twentieth century. The skull is not filled with green cheese! On the other hand, the arrogance of many scientists toward philosophy and their faith in the scientific method is equally naive. Scientists clearly have much to learn from philosophy as an intellectual discipline.