Cooperating Teachers' Perceptions of the Collaborative, Standards-based Professional Block of the Secondary Education Program at Georgia Southern University PDF Download

Author: Mary Theresa Mallard Bennett
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : High school teachers
Languages : en
Pages : 298

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 580

View

Book Description

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertation abstracts
Languages : en
Pages : 776

View

Book Description

Author: Kathleen Iris Beattie
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 334

View

Book Description

Author: Charlotte Courtney Leedom
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Elementary school teachers
Languages : en
Pages : 184

View

Book Description
This thesis describes general education teachers' perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of co-teaching with special education teachers in the delivery of a standards-based curriculum at the elementary and middle school levels. The researcher collected data from interviewing five different general education teachers from three different school sites. The teachers taught in classrooms that had students with and without disabilities. This study focuses upon the practical logistics of co-teaching, administrative support, lessons learned from experience, and advice to new co-teachers. Interview results indicated that general education teachers do support co-teaching as a means for providing students with disabilities access to the general education core curriculum. By working together, the general education teachers felt they had a better chance of implementing a learning environment conducive to instructing students with and without disabilities, than they would have on their own. Key words: Inclusion, collaboration, co-teaching, perceptions, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, universal design.

Author: Angela M. Hughes
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Special education teachers
Languages : en
Pages : 108

View

Book Description
The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions of regular education teachers and special education teachers related to the impact of collaboration on the effectiveness of co-teaching. Participants included K-8 regular education teachers and special education teachers employed by one school district in southeastern Pennsylvania. Thirty-four teacher participants, 19 regular education teachers and 15 special education teachers, participated in a researcher designed online survey consisting of demographic questions, 37 Likert questions and four open-ended questions. Seven participants answered researcher designed interview questions. Both regular education teachers and special education teachers acknowledged student success in the co-taught classroom that provided an environment where all student needs could be met through individualization and differentiation. Regular education teachers and special education teachers concurred that there was a need for common planning time and professional development opportunities; however, the findings indicated that there were inconsistencies with designated common planning time and a lack of professional development activities. Both participant groups also indicated a need for program evaluation related to co-teaching. Regular education teachers' perceptions largely aligned with the special education teachers'; however, some discrepancies were identified regarding training opportunities, as well as the lack of clarity between the expectations of regular education teachers and special education teachers.

Author: Deborah Richardson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Special education teachers
Languages : en
Pages : 88

View

Book Description
Author's abstract: The researcher's purpose of this study was to understand perceptions of co-teaching by special education and general education teachers, and how those perceptions make the implementation of co-teaching for students with disabilities in the general education classroom successful. The study examined teacher perceptions on training for co-teaching, recommended practices for co-teaching, and supports needed for the co-teaching team. The researcher administered a Likert-scale survey, Perceptions of Co-Teaching Survey developed by Vance Austin (2001) to 45 special education and 98 general education teachers with co-teaching experience from three school districts in southeast Georgia. Teacher perceptions in three different areas were addressed: (1) Perceptions of current experience and recommended practices for co-teaching. (2) Preparations necessary for co-teaching and (3) School based supports that facilitate co-teaching. The researcher analyzed differences in the two groups of participants, special education teachers, and general education teachers. Outcomes presented were generally in agreement on the perceptions from the two groups. A Likert type survey was administered to 98 general education and 45 special education certified teachers with experience in co-teaching. The survey was administered in three southeast Georgia school districts. The survey showed the perceptions of both groups of teachers were in agreement for current practices, preparations necessary for co-teaching and school based supports that facilitate co-teaching. Co-teaching is a model for special education services that is used increasingly due to IDEA regulations of Least Restrictive Environment (LRE). This method of service delivery involves the cooperation and trust of both general education and special education. The study provides information on what general education and special education teachers perceive as important to their co-teaching experience.

Author: Richard L. James
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Articulation (Education).
Languages : en
Pages : 72

View

Book Description

Author: Andrea Talavera Cortez
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 242

View

Book Description
This study describes 29 cooperating teachers' perceptions of the student teaching experience. Because cooperating teachers are an integral part of teacher education programs, it is important to learn more about how elementary and secondary cooperating teachers view their roles. Fifteen elementary and 14 secondary cooperating teachers were interviewed about their perceptions of their work with student teachers. The research questions were: (a) What are cooperating teachers' perceptions of their responsibility for interacting with student teachers? (b) How do cooperating teachers report making decisions about student teachers' classroom responsibilities? (c) What are cooperating teachers' perceptions of the purposes of student teaching? (d) How do cooperating teachers describe their roles? (e) How do cooperating teachers perceive their own professional learning as a result of working with student teachers? The interview data document that there are more similarities than differences between elementary and secondary cooperating teachers' views of their work. Both elementary and secondary teachers had plans for gradually easing student teachers into classroom responsibilities. They used the same indicators of readiness for teaching. They perceived themselves as valuable partners in the process of teacher education. Having worked with many student teachers, the cooperating teachers in this study perceived that their classrooms served as laboratories for learning how to teach. They also felt that student teachers were able to learn about children. The major difference between elementary and secondary teachers was that teachers' expectations for student teachers at the secondary level were more content specific. Elementary teachers tended to expect their student teachers to be generalists.

Author: Abby Volmer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 226

View

Book Description
College of Education faculty members at the University of Central Missouri found that public school teachers and administrators from surrounding schools were reluctant to hand over classrooms of students to novice teachers for student teaching. With high stakes accountability for test scores, teachers voiced their need to be present in the classroom, particularly during spring semester of statewide testing (Diana, 2014). The university adopted a co-teaching model of student teaching to prepare its teaching candidates for the first year of teaching while allowing the cooperating teacher to stay in the classroom throughout the student teaching term. The problem-of-practice addressed in this study focuses on the need to determine if a co-teaching student teacher model provides university students an adequate amount of clinical experience and preparation to support a successful first year of teaching. The purpose of this study is two-fold: 1) analyze the perceptions of former and current student teachers, cooperating teachers, and university supervisors on the co-teaching model of student teaching and 2) assess the model's effectiveness in preparing student teachers for their first year of teaching. To this end, the research questions are as follows: Research Question 1. What are the perceptions of University of Central Missouri current and former student teachers on the co-teaching student-teaching model's ability to prepare student teachers for their first year of teaching? Research Question 2. What are the perceptions of University of Central Missouri university supervisors on the co-teaching student-teaching model's ability to prepare student teachers for their first year of teaching? Research Question 3. What are the perceptions of cooperating teachers on the co-teaching student- teaching model's ability to prepare student teachers for their first year of teaching? The research questions were answered through an analysis of the data collected via a quantitative survey followed by a qualitative interview. The quantitative survey asked respondents to rate items on a Likert-type scale (Fink, 2013) as to how well they perceived the co-teaching model of student teaching prepares student teachers to meet Missouri Teaching Standards. The qualitative survey asked respondents to discuss their perceptions of how well the co-teaching model of student teaching prepares student teachers for their first year of teaching based on their personal experience. The responses indicated that the co-teaching model scored higher in first year teacher preparation by elementary teachers and elementary supervisors than by secondary teachers and supervisors. Responses also indicated that student teachers and cooperating teachers perceived the co-teaching model as more positively preparing student teachers for their first year of teaching than do university supervisors. Additionally, responses indicated that the co-teaching model of student teaching closely aligns to the Gradual Release of Responsibility theory of learning (Pearson & Gallagher, 1983) with the co-teaching model of student teaching strengths as follows: extensive modeling by a More Knowledgeable Other (Vygotsky, 1978), extensive professional reflection and immediate feedback, a narrowing of focus, professional collaboration, and building of confidence in the student teacher. Due to the student teacher never solely taking over the classroom responsibilities in a co-teaching model of student teaching, the model's barrier for preparing student teachers for their first year of teaching centers on the student teacher not receiving a fully realistic teaching experience in a classroom without a co-teacher. On this basis, it is recommended that universities and school districts adopt the co-teaching model of student teaching to provide a strong base of teaching background for the student teacher through the Gradual Release of Responsibility. The student teacher should also receive two to three weeks of sole classroom responsibility and all the duties in that role as to provide a realistic experience of teaching without a co-teacher present. Further research could synthesize the perceptions of the same group of participants in this study regarding a model similar to the one recommended.