Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office, and General ServicesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Comparison of Pay and Benefits Between Uniformed Military and Federal Civilian Employees
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office, and General ServicesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Comparison of Pay and Benefits Between Uniformed Military and Federal Civilian Employees
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office, and General ServicesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Comparison of Pay and Benefits Between Uniformed Military and Federal Civilian Employees
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs. Subcommittee on Civil Service, Post Office, and General ServicesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Book Description
Military Personnel
Author: Brenda S. FarrellPublisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437931685
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Book Description
Compares pay and benefits provided to members of the Armed Forces (AF) with that of comparably situated private-sector employees to assess how the differences in pay and benefits affect recruiting and retention of members of the AF. The objectives were to: (1) assess total military compensation for active duty officers and for enlisted personnel; (2) compare private-sector pay and benefits for civilians of similar age, educ., and experience with similar job responsibilities and working conditions of officers and enlisted personnel of the AF; and (3) assess the 10th QRMC recommendation to include regular military compensation and select benefits when comparing military and civilian compensation to ascertain if it is appropriate.
Dual Compensation Paid to Retired Uniformed Services Personnel in Federal Civilian Positions
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. Subcommittee on InvestigationsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Civil service
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Book Description
Military Compensation
Author: United States. General Accounting OfficePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
Military Personnel
Author: Brenda S. FarrellPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Book Description
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 required that we conduct a study comparing pay and benefits provided by law to members of the Armed Forces with that of comparably situated private-sector employees to assess how the differences in pay and benefits affect recruiting and retention of members of the Armed Forces. Specifically, our objectives were to (1) assess total military compensation for active duty officers and for enlisted personnel; (2) compare private-sector pay and benefits for civilians of similar age, education, and experience with similar job responsibilities and working conditions of officers and enlisted personnel of the Armed Forces; and (3) assess the 10th QRMC recommendation to include regular military compensation and select benefits when comparing military and civilian compensation to ascertain if it is appropriate.
Comparison of Federal and Private Sector Pay and Benefits
Author: United States. General Accounting OfficePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Employee fringe benefits
Languages : en
Pages : 32
Book Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided current information on private sector and federal white-collar employee compensation packages. By law, federal employees' salaries are set at a level equitable and comparable with similar levels of work in the private sector, unless the President proposes alternative federal pay rates. There is no such requirement for benefits comparability. GAO analyzed several pay and benefits comparability studies conducted by private and federal organizations, but did not independently validate the data contained in the studies. GAO noted that an independent study found that: (1) as of 1984, federal employees' total compensation averaged 7.2 percent less than that for private sector employees; and (2) in 1985, the difference increased to 9 percent or more because the federal pay increase for 1985 was limited to less than the average pay increase in the private sector. GAO found that: (1) frequent presidential use of alternative pay rates caused pay for federal employees to lag significantly behind that for private sector employees; (2) an 18.28 percent federal pay increase would be necessary to achieve federal pay comparability in 1985; (3) the federal retirement system is better than the average private sector system because it is worth more as a percentage of the average employee's pay, and federal retirement benefits are adjusted annually to offset consumer price increases; (4) private studies indicated that private sector employers generally pay a higher share of employee health insurance premiums than does the government; (5) private sector employee life insurance programs provide more basic coverage than the federal employee program, usually at no cost to the employee; (6) while federal employees generally receive one less holiday than private sector employees, this is offset by more generous federal annual leave benefits; and (7) federal sick leave lags behind the average private sector illness and disability income plan by 0.7 percent of pay.
Military and Federal Civilian Disposable Income Comparisons and Extra Pays Received by Military Personnel
Author: GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE WASHINGTON DC NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DIV.Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 63
Book Description
Special features of the military pay system, such as the nontaxable components and noncontributory health and retirement benefits, allow military personnel to take home a higher percentage of their gross earnings than federal civilian employees. Military personnel can also more easily establish and keep their legal residences in states which do not tax military pay and thus further their relative disposable income. In addition, a large percentage of career military personnel receive pay in addition to their basic military compensation--some as much as an additional $12,000 annually. GAO believes comparisons of military and civil service disposable incomes can provide useful insights and a frame of reference, but such comparisons do not support specific conclusions about the adequacy, inadequacy, or generosity of compensation levels under either system. (Author).
Military Compensation : Comparisons with Civilian Compensation and Related Issues
Author: United States. General Accounting OfficePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Book Description