Commission Review of a Proposal by the Chaffey Community College District To Establish an Educational Center in the City of Chino. Commission Report 04-12 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Commission Review of a Proposal by the Chaffey Community College District To Establish an Educational Center in the City of Chino. Commission Report 04-12 PDF full book. Access full book title Commission Review of a Proposal by the Chaffey Community College District To Establish an Educational Center in the City of Chino. Commission Report 04-12 by California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 14
Book Description
In this report, the Commission considers the request by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges (BOG) and the Chaffey Community College District (CCCD) to establish an Educational Center in the City of Chino. The need for this educational center dates back to 1991 when the BOG adopted the community college system?s Long Range Capital Outlay Plan. Noting robust enrollment growth through 2010, the BOG calls for the establishment of two educational centers to serve the eastern and southwestern portions of the district. By 2000, the district?s available physical capacity significantly diminished as enrollment growth hit record levels. Enrollment demand was especially robust in the growing communities of Fontana and Chino Valley. The Commission concurs with the California Community College Board of Governors that an educational center should be established in Chino. The Commission specifically concludes that: (1) enrollments from the Chino Valley will almost triple over the next 12 years; (2) capacity at the existing outreach center in downtown Chino cannot accommodate the anticipated enrollment demand; and that (3) the proposed educational offerings address the area's educational needs.
Author: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 14
Book Description
In this report, the Commission considers the request by the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges (BOG) and the Chaffey Community College District (CCCD) to establish an Educational Center in the City of Chino. The need for this educational center dates back to 1991 when the BOG adopted the community college system?s Long Range Capital Outlay Plan. Noting robust enrollment growth through 2010, the BOG calls for the establishment of two educational centers to serve the eastern and southwestern portions of the district. By 2000, the district?s available physical capacity significantly diminished as enrollment growth hit record levels. Enrollment demand was especially robust in the growing communities of Fontana and Chino Valley. The Commission concurs with the California Community College Board of Governors that an educational center should be established in Chino. The Commission specifically concludes that: (1) enrollments from the Chino Valley will almost triple over the next 12 years; (2) capacity at the existing outreach center in downtown Chino cannot accommodate the anticipated enrollment demand; and that (3) the proposed educational offerings address the area's educational needs.
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 12
Book Description
In this report, the Commission considers a proposal by the Los Rios Community College District to establish an educational center in a rapidly growing and developing area of Sacramento called North Natomas. The center would be situated on 6.5 acres of land approximately 6 miles north of downtown Sacramento. The Commission finds that the information contained in the district's Needs Study meets all of the requirements outlined in the Commission's guidelines for the review of new educational centers. The Commission, therefore, concurs with the recommendation of the Community College Board of Governors that the proposed North Natomas Educational Center be established as a state-approved off-campus center of American River College and that it become eligible immediately to compete for State capital outlay and support budget funding. Natomas Educational Center--Projected Operational Costs are appended.
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 9
Book Description
Educational centers serve a number of purposes. Foremost, they are a more cost-effective way of meeting increased student demand than building costly comprehensive full-service campuses. Educational centers also promote shared facility use and intersegmental collaboration, which enables higher education systems to use resources more efficiently. Educational centers can increase learning productivity because students can spend more time engaged in learning and less time traveling to classes at a main campus. Public colleges and universities can also use educational centers to expand access in rural and remote areas. Rural centers are especially beneficial when universities and community colleges have large service areas that include significant rural and remote areas. This report clarifies the California Postsecondary Education Commission's review process, and provides analyses supporting a recommendation that further study be undertaken jointly by the Commission and the Chancellor's Office before proposed revisions to regulations governing community college educational centers are finalized. The proposed revisions would impact the full-time equivalent student (FTES) threshold for educational centers, and exceptions to that threshold. Calculating FTES for Educational Planning Purposes is appended. (Contains 3 figures.).
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor Publisher: ISBN: Category : Educational law and legislation Languages : en Pages : 1544
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. General Subcommittee on Education Publisher: ISBN: Category : School facilities Languages : en Pages : 562
Book Description
Considers H.R. 9948 and related H.R. 10080 and H.R. 10105, to amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to establish grant programs for educational facilities construction.
Author: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 2
Book Description
Although each public higher education system in California has a unique mission and social purpose, the systems are united in a most common and fundamental way: each aims to enhance the intellectual, technical, and creative capacity of its student learners. Because advanced knowledge--scientific, technical, and procedural--tends to be organized by fields of study, and delivered to students through specific programs, the ultimate success and benefit of the state's higher education enterprise rests with the quality and breadth of institutional degree and certificate programs. "Assembly Resolution 770, Statutes of 1974," established the California Postsecondary Education Commission (CPEC) as the statewide planning and coordinating agency for higher education, with specific mandated planning functions and responsibilities. Primary among the responsibilities given to CPEC is academic and vocational program review. In addition, the Commission is charged with reviewing and commenting on the need for new campuses and off-campus centers. The Commission developed a set of principles to guide the program review process. The principles are intended to: (1) safeguard the state against inefficiencies in the allocation of program resources; (2) help ensure that new programs will meet student and societal needs; and (3) ensure that programs are well conceived and that they will have desired educational and social consequences. As defined in statute, the Commission's role in the review process is primarily advisory.
Author: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento
Author: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission
Author: California Postsecondary Education Commission
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor
Author: 
Author: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Author: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. General Subcommittee on Education
Author: California State Postsecondary Education Commission, Sacramento