Collected Works of Philip Henry Wicksteed: An essay on the co-ordination of the laws of distribution ; Getting and spending PDF Download

Author: Philip Henry Wicksteed
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 120

View

Book Description

Author: Philip Henry Wicksteed
Publisher: Burns & Oates
ISBN:
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 212

View

Book Description
Philip Henry Wicksteed (1844-1927), the late-19th and early-20th century English economist is known as a leading Dante scholar, but his synthesis of studies of Comte, Jevons, Aquinas, Aristotle, Ibsen, and many others, all came to bear on his writings in economics. For him there was no distinction between economic aspects of human life and other aspects. Wicksteed tried to get economists to take a broad view of their subject, bringing to economics humanitarian feelings, a critical eye, and the common sense of his tradition.

Author: Philip Henry Wicksteed
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 452

View

Book Description

Author: Philip Henry Wicksteed
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 484

View

Book Description

Author: Philip Henry Wicksteed
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 734

View

Book Description

Author: James M. Buchanan
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
ISBN: 9780472061006
Category : Decision-making
Languages : en
Pages : 388

View

Book Description
A scientific study of the political and economic factors influencing democratic decision making

Author: John Pullen
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1134010893
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 220

View

Book Description
John Pullen presents a critical history of the concept of the Marginal Profit Theory of Distribution looking at the contributions of its proponents (eg Stigler) and its critics (eg Pareto) and stressing the continuity of the debate.

Author: Mason Gaffney
Publisher: Georgist Paradigm
ISBN: 9780856832444
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
Condemning the post-industrial economy to protracted periods of economic failure, this thought-provoking book documents how the integrity of economics as a discipline was deliberately compromised in the United States towards the end of the 19th century. Several chairs of economics were funded at leading universities to rebrand economics to justify unearned income. The tools for this strategy became neo-classical economics, and, unlike classical economists like Adam Smith who described wealth as the product of three factors--land, labor, and capital--the new theorists reduced these to two: labor and capital, thus treating land as capital. This concealed the benefits enjoyed by those in receipt of the rent from land. The effect, the authors reveal, was to deprive professional economists of the ability to diagnose problems, forecast important trends, and prescribe solutions.

Author: Klaus Hennings
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9400921810
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 380

View

Book Description
Warren J. Samuels Each book in this series explores the present status of its field in terms of where it is, how it got there, the existing tensions within the field, and something of how the field might develop in the future. Each book presumes that work in each field is neither settled nor unequivocal. Each book attempts to comprehend its field as an evolving, developmental process or set or efforts. This particular book, covering neoclassical economics, is the third of three in the field of the History of Economic Thought. The others are Pre-Classical Economic Thought, edited by S. Todd Lowry, and Classical Political Economy, edited by William O. Thweatt. Each one conducts the same kind of analysis as the others in the series, with the understanding that here we are dealing with the history of interpretation, rather than a substantive body of analysis of a certain aspect of the economy: for example, labor or international trade. (That understanding must be com plex and subtle, inasmuch as revision of interpretation of earlier ideas is part of the process-both cause and consequence-of re-analyzing the economy. ) In this group we are interested in how recent and contemporary writers have interpreted the history of economic thought differently, both among themselves and from earlier writers. 1 NEOCLASSICAL ECONOMIC lHEORY 2 Several topics must be discussed to place such work in perspective, in part as it is here applied to the history of the interpretation of neoclassical economics.

Author: Jonathan Nitzan
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1134022298
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 853

View

Book Description
Conventional theories of capitalism are mired in a deep crisis: after centuries of debate, they are still unable to tell us what capital is. Liberals and Marxists both think of capital as an ‘economic’ entity that they count in universal units of ‘utils’ or ‘abstract labour’, respectively. But these units are totally fictitious. Nobody has ever been able to observe or measure them, and for a good reason: they don’t exist. Since liberalism and Marxism depend on these non-existing units, their theories hang in suspension. They cannot explain the process that matters most – the accumulation of capital. This book offers a radical alternative. According to the authors, capital is not a narrow economic entity, but a symbolic quantification of power. It has little to do with utility or abstract labour, and it extends far beyond machines and production lines. Capital, the authors claim, represents the organized power of dominant capital groups to reshape – or creorder – their society. Written in simple language, accessible to lay readers and experts alike, the book develops a novel political economy. It takes the reader through the history, assumptions and limitations of mainstream economics and its associated theories of politics. It examines the evolution of Marxist thinking on accumulation and the state. And it articulates an innovative theory of ‘capital as power’ and a new history of the ‘capitalist mode of power’.