Author: Genevieve A. Chornenki
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780433462996
Category : Dispute resolution (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 363
Book Description
"Recourse to dispute resolution processes such as mediation and arbitration is increasing as litigants look for more practical means of resolving their disputes. This authoritative and accessible work provides practical advice on how to select, prepare for and engage in a range of dispute resolution processes. Practical and portable, and including examples, forms, checklists and sample documents, this handbook is a reference source for anyone who is involved in a dispute resolution process."--Pub. desc.
Bypass Court
Author: Genevieve A. Chornenki
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780433462996
Category : Dispute resolution (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 363
Book Description
"Recourse to dispute resolution processes such as mediation and arbitration is increasing as litigants look for more practical means of resolving their disputes. This authoritative and accessible work provides practical advice on how to select, prepare for and engage in a range of dispute resolution processes. Practical and portable, and including examples, forms, checklists and sample documents, this handbook is a reference source for anyone who is involved in a dispute resolution process."--Pub. desc.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780433462996
Category : Dispute resolution (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 363
Book Description
"Recourse to dispute resolution processes such as mediation and arbitration is increasing as litigants look for more practical means of resolving their disputes. This authoritative and accessible work provides practical advice on how to select, prepare for and engage in a range of dispute resolution processes. Practical and portable, and including examples, forms, checklists and sample documents, this handbook is a reference source for anyone who is involved in a dispute resolution process."--Pub. desc.
The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court
Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195093321
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 501
Book Description
Schwartz provides the draft opinions prepared by Justices in key cases during the Rehnquist Court, together with short histories, commentaries, and analyses of what happened once the drafts were circulated.
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195093321
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 501
Book Description
Schwartz provides the draft opinions prepared by Justices in key cases during the Rehnquist Court, together with short histories, commentaries, and analyses of what happened once the drafts were circulated.
Ethics, Conflict and Medical Treatment for Children E-Book
Author: Dominic Wilkinson
Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences
ISBN: 0702077828
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 190
Book Description
What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new 'dissensus' framework for future cases of disagreement. - This new book critically examines the core ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. - The contents review prominent cases of disagreement from the UK and internationally and analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features around treatment disputes in the 21st century. - The book proposes a radical new framework for future cases of disagreement around the care of gravely ill people.
Publisher: Elsevier Health Sciences
ISBN: 0702077828
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 190
Book Description
What should happen when doctors and parents disagree about what would be best for a child? When should courts become involved? Should life support be stopped against parents' wishes? The case of Charlie Gard, reached global attention in 2017. It led to widespread debate about the ethics of disagreements between doctors and parents, about the place of the law in such disputes, and about the variation in approach between different parts of the world. In this book, medical ethicists Dominic Wilkinson and Julian Savulescu critically examine the ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. They use the Gard case as a springboard to a wider discussion about the rights of parents, the harms of treatment, and the vital issue of limited resources. They discuss other prominent UK and international cases of disagreement and conflict. From opposite sides of the debate Wilkinson and Savulescu provocatively outline the strongest arguments in favour of and against treatment. They analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features of treatment disputes in the 21st century and argue that disagreement about controversial ethical questions is both inevitable and desirable. They outline a series of lessons from the Gard case and propose a radical new 'dissensus' framework for future cases of disagreement. - This new book critically examines the core ethical questions at the heart of disputes about medical treatment for children. - The contents review prominent cases of disagreement from the UK and internationally and analyse some of the distinctive and challenging features around treatment disputes in the 21st century. - The book proposes a radical new framework for future cases of disagreement around the care of gravely ill people.
Girls on the Stand
Author: Helena Silverstein
Publisher: New York University Press
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 264
Book Description
Choice Outstanding Academic Title for 2008 The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that states may require parental involvement in the abortion decisions of pregnant minors as long as minors have the opportunity to petition for a "bypass" of parental involvement. To date, virtually all of the 34 states that mandate parental involvement have put judges in charge of the bypass process. Individual judges are thereby responsible for deciding whether or not the minor has a legitimate basis to seek an abortion absent parental participation. In this revealing and disturbing book, Helena Silverstein presents a detailed picture of how the bypass process actually functions. Silverstein led a team of researchers who surveyed more than 200 courts designated to handle bypass cases in three states. Her research shows indisputably that laws are being routinely ignored and, when enforced, interpreted by judges in widely divergent ways. In fact, she finds audacious acts of judicial discretion, in which judges structure bypass proceedings in a shameless and calculated effort to communicate their religious and political views and to persuade minors to carry their pregnancies to term. Her investigations uncover judicial mandates that minors receive pro-life counseling from evangelical Christian ministries, as well as the practice of appointing attorneys to represent the interests of unborn children at bypass hearings. Girls on the Stand convincingly demonstrates that safeguards promised by parental involvement laws do not exist in practice and that a legal process designed to help young women make informed decisions instead victimizes them. In making this case, the book casts doubt not only on the structure of parental involvement mandates but also on the na ve faith in law that sustains them. It consciously contributes to a growing body of books aimed at debunking the popular myth that, in the land of the free, there is equal justice for all.
Publisher: New York University Press
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 264
Book Description
Choice Outstanding Academic Title for 2008 The U.S. Supreme Court has decided that states may require parental involvement in the abortion decisions of pregnant minors as long as minors have the opportunity to petition for a "bypass" of parental involvement. To date, virtually all of the 34 states that mandate parental involvement have put judges in charge of the bypass process. Individual judges are thereby responsible for deciding whether or not the minor has a legitimate basis to seek an abortion absent parental participation. In this revealing and disturbing book, Helena Silverstein presents a detailed picture of how the bypass process actually functions. Silverstein led a team of researchers who surveyed more than 200 courts designated to handle bypass cases in three states. Her research shows indisputably that laws are being routinely ignored and, when enforced, interpreted by judges in widely divergent ways. In fact, she finds audacious acts of judicial discretion, in which judges structure bypass proceedings in a shameless and calculated effort to communicate their religious and political views and to persuade minors to carry their pregnancies to term. Her investigations uncover judicial mandates that minors receive pro-life counseling from evangelical Christian ministries, as well as the practice of appointing attorneys to represent the interests of unborn children at bypass hearings. Girls on the Stand convincingly demonstrates that safeguards promised by parental involvement laws do not exist in practice and that a legal process designed to help young women make informed decisions instead victimizes them. In making this case, the book casts doubt not only on the structure of parental involvement mandates but also on the na ve faith in law that sustains them. It consciously contributes to a growing body of books aimed at debunking the popular myth that, in the land of the free, there is equal justice for all.
First Among Equals
Author: Kenneth W. Starr
Publisher: Grand Central Publishing
ISBN: 0446554162
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 227
Book Description
Today's United States Supreme Court consists of nine intriguingly varied justices and one overwhelming contradiction: Compared to its revolutionary predecessor, the Rehnquist Court appears deceptively passive, yet it stands as dramatically ready to defy convention as the Warren Court of the 1950s and 60s. Now Kenneth W. Starr-who served as clerk for one chief justice, argued twenty-five cases as solicitor general before the Supreme Court, and is widely regarded as one of the nation's most distinguished practitioners of constitutional law-offers us an incisive and unprecedented look at the paradoxes, the power, and the people of the highest court in the land. In First Among Equals Ken Starr traces the evolution of the Supreme Court from its beginnings, examines major Court decisions of the past three decades, and uncovers the sometimes surprising continuity between the precedent-shattering Warren Court and its successors under Burger and Rehnquist. He shows us, as no other author ever has, the very human justices who shape our law, from Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court's most pivotal-and perhaps most powerful-player, to Clarence Thomas, its most original thinker. And he explores the present Court's evolution into a lawyerly tribunal dedicated to balance and consensus on the one hand, and zealous debate on hotly contested issues of social policy on the other. On race, the Court overturned affirmative action and held firm to an undeviating color-blind standard. On executive privilege, the Court rebuffed three presidents, both Republican and Democrat, who fought to increase their power at the expense of rival branches of government. On the 2000 presidential election, the Court prevented what it deemed a runaway Florida court from riding roughshod over state law-illustrating how in our system of government, the Supreme Court is truly the first among equals. Compelling and supremely readable, First Among Equals sheds new light on the most frequently misunderstood legal pillar of American life.
Publisher: Grand Central Publishing
ISBN: 0446554162
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 227
Book Description
Today's United States Supreme Court consists of nine intriguingly varied justices and one overwhelming contradiction: Compared to its revolutionary predecessor, the Rehnquist Court appears deceptively passive, yet it stands as dramatically ready to defy convention as the Warren Court of the 1950s and 60s. Now Kenneth W. Starr-who served as clerk for one chief justice, argued twenty-five cases as solicitor general before the Supreme Court, and is widely regarded as one of the nation's most distinguished practitioners of constitutional law-offers us an incisive and unprecedented look at the paradoxes, the power, and the people of the highest court in the land. In First Among Equals Ken Starr traces the evolution of the Supreme Court from its beginnings, examines major Court decisions of the past three decades, and uncovers the sometimes surprising continuity between the precedent-shattering Warren Court and its successors under Burger and Rehnquist. He shows us, as no other author ever has, the very human justices who shape our law, from Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court's most pivotal-and perhaps most powerful-player, to Clarence Thomas, its most original thinker. And he explores the present Court's evolution into a lawyerly tribunal dedicated to balance and consensus on the one hand, and zealous debate on hotly contested issues of social policy on the other. On race, the Court overturned affirmative action and held firm to an undeviating color-blind standard. On executive privilege, the Court rebuffed three presidents, both Republican and Democrat, who fought to increase their power at the expense of rival branches of government. On the 2000 presidential election, the Court prevented what it deemed a runaway Florida court from riding roughshod over state law-illustrating how in our system of government, the Supreme Court is truly the first among equals. Compelling and supremely readable, First Among Equals sheds new light on the most frequently misunderstood legal pillar of American life.
California. Court of Appeal (1st Appellate District). Records and Briefs
Author: California (State).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 82
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 82
Book Description
108-1 Hearing: Potential Congressional Responses to The Supreme Court's Decision In State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. V. Campbell, Etc., Serial No. 48, September 23, 2003, *
Sex
Author: David M. Haugen
Publisher: Greenhaven Publishing LLC
ISBN: 0737768150
Category : Young Adult Nonfiction
Languages : en
Pages : 159
Book Description
The very inevitable topic of sex makes its way into our daily lives, whether we want it to or not, and now, it's starting at younger ages than ever before. This very important volume provides primary and secondary source essays that help the reader wade through several issues relating to sex and law. Readers evaluate the age of consent, and the perceived and real rights to birth control, abortion, and the role of parental consent with both. Sexting and other techno-based topics are also evaluated.
Publisher: Greenhaven Publishing LLC
ISBN: 0737768150
Category : Young Adult Nonfiction
Languages : en
Pages : 159
Book Description
The very inevitable topic of sex makes its way into our daily lives, whether we want it to or not, and now, it's starting at younger ages than ever before. This very important volume provides primary and secondary source essays that help the reader wade through several issues relating to sex and law. Readers evaluate the age of consent, and the perceived and real rights to birth control, abortion, and the role of parental consent with both. Sexting and other techno-based topics are also evaluated.
HOUSE SPEAKER V GOVERNOR; MICHIGAN UNITED CONSERVATION CLUBS V GOVERNOR; MICHIGAN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOUNDATION V GOVERNOR, 443 MICH 560 (1993)
California. Court of Appeal (2nd Appellate District). Records and Briefs
Author: California (State).
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 156
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 156
Book Description