Author: Great BritainPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alabama claims
Languages : en
Pages : 972
Book Description
British counter case and evidence
Author: Great BritainPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alabama claims
Languages : en
Pages : 972
Book Description
The Counter Case of Great Britain as Laid Before the Tribunal of Arbitration Convened at Geneva ...
Author: Great BritainPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alabama claims
Languages : en
Pages : 1202
Book Description
The Counter Case of the United States Before the Tribunal of Arbitration to Convene at Paris Under the Treaty Between the United States of America and Great Britain, Concluded February 29, 1892
Author: United StatesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bering Sea controversy
Languages : en
Pages : 586
Book Description
Catalogue of the Free Public Library of Concord, Mass., Jan. 1, 1875
Author: Concord Free Public Library (Concord, Mass.)Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 496
Book Description
British Guiana Boundary
Author: Great BritainPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Guyana
Languages : en
Pages : 582
Book Description
Proceedings of the Alaskan Boundary Tribunal: pt. I. The counter-case of the United States before the tribunal. pt. II. Appendix to the counter-case of the United States. pt. 3. Counter-case presented on the part of His Britannic Majesty to the tribunal. pt. 4. Appendix to the counter-case of His Majesty's government
Author: Alaskan Boundary TribunalPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alaska
Languages : en
Pages : 594
Book Description
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales
Author: Great Britain: Law CommissionPublisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780102971170
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 224
Book Description
This project addressed the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Currently, too much expert opinion evidence is admitted without adequate scrutiny because no clear test is being applied to determine whether the evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted. Juries may therefore be reaching conclusions on the basis of unreliable evidence, as confirmed by a number of miscarriages of justice in recent years. Following consultation on a discussion paper (LCCP 190, 2009, ISDBN 9780118404655) the Commission recommends that there should be a new reliability-based admissibility test for expert evidence in criminal proceedings. The test would not need to be applied routinely or unnecessarily, but it would be applied in appropriate cases and it would result in the exclusion of unreliable expert opinion evidence. Under the test, expert opinion evidence would not be admitted unless it was adjudged to be sufficiently reliable to go before a jury. The draft Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill published with the report (as Appendix A) sets out the admissibility test and also provides the guidance judges would need when applying the test, setting out the key reasons why an expert's opinion evidence might be unreliable. The Bill also codifies (with slight modifications) the uncontroversial aspects of the present law, so that all the admissibility requirements for expert evidence would be set out in a single Act of Parliament and carry equal authority.
Papers Relating to the Treaty of Washington [between the U.S. and Great Britain, May 8, 1871]
![Papers Relating to the Treaty of Washington [between the U.S. and Great Britain, May 8, 1871] PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/v30LXeMy9R8C?fife=w80-h100)
Author: House Documents
Author: USA House of RepresentativesPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 716
Book Description
Geneva arbitration
Author: United States. Dept. of StatePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Alabama claims
Languages : en
Pages : 686
Book Description