Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Book Description
Bridge-deck design, at present, often includes costly bridge-deck drainage provisions. Many bridge engineers have questioned the need for bridge-deck drainage appurtenances, at least to the extent presently included in typical bridge design. This document presents criteria to determine if bridge drainage scuppers and drains are required. A design nomograph allows a rapid decision to be made. A key variable, design rain intensity, is analyzed: the rational method is reviewed and new methods for setting design rain intensity are presented that consider hydroplaning and driver vision. Regardless of the need for scuppers, bridge-end drainage is necessary, and methods are given. If scuppers are needed, this document provides sound drainage design practice for bridge drainage.
Bridge Deck Drainage Guidelines
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Book Description
Bridge-deck design, at present, often includes costly bridge-deck drainage provisions. Many bridge engineers have questioned the need for bridge-deck drainage appurtenances, at least to the extent presently included in typical bridge design. This document presents criteria to determine if bridge drainage scuppers and drains are required. A design nomograph allows a rapid decision to be made. A key variable, design rain intensity, is analyzed: the rational method is reviewed and new methods for setting design rain intensity are presented that consider hydroplaning and driver vision. Regardless of the need for scuppers, bridge-end drainage is necessary, and methods are given. If scuppers are needed, this document provides sound drainage design practice for bridge drainage.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Book Description
Bridge-deck design, at present, often includes costly bridge-deck drainage provisions. Many bridge engineers have questioned the need for bridge-deck drainage appurtenances, at least to the extent presently included in typical bridge design. This document presents criteria to determine if bridge drainage scuppers and drains are required. A design nomograph allows a rapid decision to be made. A key variable, design rain intensity, is analyzed: the rational method is reviewed and new methods for setting design rain intensity are presented that consider hydroplaning and driver vision. Regardless of the need for scuppers, bridge-end drainage is necessary, and methods are given. If scuppers are needed, this document provides sound drainage design practice for bridge drainage.
Road and Bridge Deck Drainage Systems
Bridge Deck Drainage: Evaluation of KDOT’s Current Design Guidance
Author: Alexander Michalek
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
Proper drainage of bridge decks is essential for vehicle safety and bridge sustainability. The evaluation of Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) design guidelines could reduce the likelihood of future deck drainage problems. Therefore, this research investigated current bridge deck drainage design guidelines and related literature and surveyed 22 Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to identify deck drainage issues, solutions, designs, and guidance. This study utilized a scaled physical model and varying downspout shapes and sizes to investigate the hydraulic performance of current KDOT deck drainage design and evaluate grate efficiency and lateral spread. Experimental variables included deck cross slope, longitudinal slope, and approach discharge. This study also compared a curved vane grate to the current KDOT bar grate to determine differences in drainage efficiency. An erosion rate test was performed between the two grate types to determine if changing from a rectangular vane to a curved vane could increase cleanout potential, thereby alleviating problems related to inlet clogging. Experimental results indicated increasing the downspout size from 8 inches to 10 inches or changing the downspout shape from circular to square could increase drainage efficiency with no negative impacts to performance. The curved vane grate showed similar hydraulic performance (i.e., efficiency) to the KDOT rectangular vane grate, and erosion results indicated that the curved vane grate performed similarly to the rectangular grate for cleanout of accumulated debris within the grate. Although experimental results indicated similar performance of rectangular and curved vane grates, DOT survey results showed superior in-field performance of curved-vane grates.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 92
Book Description
Proper drainage of bridge decks is essential for vehicle safety and bridge sustainability. The evaluation of Kansas Department of Transportation (KDOT) design guidelines could reduce the likelihood of future deck drainage problems. Therefore, this research investigated current bridge deck drainage design guidelines and related literature and surveyed 22 Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to identify deck drainage issues, solutions, designs, and guidance. This study utilized a scaled physical model and varying downspout shapes and sizes to investigate the hydraulic performance of current KDOT deck drainage design and evaluate grate efficiency and lateral spread. Experimental variables included deck cross slope, longitudinal slope, and approach discharge. This study also compared a curved vane grate to the current KDOT bar grate to determine differences in drainage efficiency. An erosion rate test was performed between the two grate types to determine if changing from a rectangular vane to a curved vane could increase cleanout potential, thereby alleviating problems related to inlet clogging. Experimental results indicated increasing the downspout size from 8 inches to 10 inches or changing the downspout shape from circular to square could increase drainage efficiency with no negative impacts to performance. The curved vane grate showed similar hydraulic performance (i.e., efficiency) to the KDOT rectangular vane grate, and erosion results indicated that the curved vane grate performed similarly to the rectangular grate for cleanout of accumulated debris within the grate. Although experimental results indicated similar performance of rectangular and curved vane grates, DOT survey results showed superior in-field performance of curved-vane grates.
Design of Bridge Deck Drainage
Author: G. Kenneth Young
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 123
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 123
Book Description
Road and Bridge Deck Drainage Systems
Author: Jiri Marsalek
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Book Description
Bridge Deck Drains
Author: I. R. Aarset
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Book Description
Highway Drainage Guidelines
Bridge Drainage Systems
Author: National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 56
Book Description
Design principles and procedures and maintenance practices for bridge drainage systems are evaluated in this report, which also includes recommendations for improvements on current practice. Bridges should have adequate cross-slope and grade to allow the water to run quickly into drains. Where grades permit, some states carry all the water to catch basins at the ends. An inlet box may be used to collect the runoff. Some states have detailed procedures for determining drain spacing. Debris can be controlled by keeping it out of inlet boxes, accepting and storing it so it cannot go through the system, or transporting it through. Maintenance at regular intervals is the key to the success of a drainage system. Disposal of run off water can be a simple straight drop onto the land or water beneath the bridge or a pipe system to carry the water to the local sewer system. Current practices indicate that deck cross-slope and grade should be less than 2% and 0.5% respectively; that bridge drains may be holes through the deck, fabricated inlet boxes, or catch basins at the ends of the bridge; that inlet areas should be as large as possible; that pipes should have a minimum diameter of 6 in., a miminum radius of 18 in., and a minimum slope of 2%; that cleanout plugs and elbows should be easily accessible; that there should be improved communication between designers and maintenance personnel; and most importantly, that bridge drainage systems should be regularly and carefully inspected and serviced.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 56
Book Description
Design principles and procedures and maintenance practices for bridge drainage systems are evaluated in this report, which also includes recommendations for improvements on current practice. Bridges should have adequate cross-slope and grade to allow the water to run quickly into drains. Where grades permit, some states carry all the water to catch basins at the ends. An inlet box may be used to collect the runoff. Some states have detailed procedures for determining drain spacing. Debris can be controlled by keeping it out of inlet boxes, accepting and storing it so it cannot go through the system, or transporting it through. Maintenance at regular intervals is the key to the success of a drainage system. Disposal of run off water can be a simple straight drop onto the land or water beneath the bridge or a pipe system to carry the water to the local sewer system. Current practices indicate that deck cross-slope and grade should be less than 2% and 0.5% respectively; that bridge drains may be holes through the deck, fabricated inlet boxes, or catch basins at the ends of the bridge; that inlet areas should be as large as possible; that pipes should have a minimum diameter of 6 in., a miminum radius of 18 in., and a minimum slope of 2%; that cleanout plugs and elbows should be easily accessible; that there should be improved communication between designers and maintenance personnel; and most importantly, that bridge drainage systems should be regularly and carefully inspected and serviced.
AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GFRP-reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks and Traffic Railings
Author:
Publisher: AASHTO
ISBN: 1560514582
Category : Bridge railings
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) materials have emerged as an alternative material for producing reinforcing bars for concrete structures. GFRP reinforcing bars offer advantages over steel reinforcement due to their noncorrosive nature and nonconductive behavior. Due to other differences in the physical and mechanical behavior of GFRP materials as opposed to steel, unique guidance on the engineering and construction of concrete bridge decks reinforced with GFRP bars is needed. These guide specifications offer a description of the unique material properties of GFRP composite materials as well as provisions for the design and construction of concrete bridge decks and railings reinforced with GFRP reinforcing bars.
Publisher: AASHTO
ISBN: 1560514582
Category : Bridge railings
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) materials have emerged as an alternative material for producing reinforcing bars for concrete structures. GFRP reinforcing bars offer advantages over steel reinforcement due to their noncorrosive nature and nonconductive behavior. Due to other differences in the physical and mechanical behavior of GFRP materials as opposed to steel, unique guidance on the engineering and construction of concrete bridge decks reinforced with GFRP bars is needed. These guide specifications offer a description of the unique material properties of GFRP composite materials as well as provisions for the design and construction of concrete bridge decks and railings reinforced with GFRP reinforcing bars.
Bridge Drainage Systems and Discharge to Waterways
Author: Jeremy Nielsen
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The intent of this project was to contact other agencies to identify their typical design practices and how they address bridge deck drainage. If available, the project sought to learn standard best practices that could be directly applied to Minnesota infrastructure plans to standardize and improve drainage detailing and design practices. In reviewing the online survey and follow-up interview results with the TAP, no concise, ready to implement solution was found and many of the agencies are addressing similar concerns and lack fully developed standards or guidance documents. Although no single specific solution was identified, several key lessons were identified in the interviews which should be incorporated into further investigation and development of standards.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Bridges
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
The intent of this project was to contact other agencies to identify their typical design practices and how they address bridge deck drainage. If available, the project sought to learn standard best practices that could be directly applied to Minnesota infrastructure plans to standardize and improve drainage detailing and design practices. In reviewing the online survey and follow-up interview results with the TAP, no concise, ready to implement solution was found and many of the agencies are addressing similar concerns and lack fully developed standards or guidance documents. Although no single specific solution was identified, several key lessons were identified in the interviews which should be incorporated into further investigation and development of standards.