"Black Bartholomew's Day." How Shall We Best Commemorate, on August 24, 1862, the Bi-centenary of the Act of Uniformity? a Plea for Truth, and Peace, and Love PDF Download

Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download "Black Bartholomew's Day." How Shall We Best Commemorate, on August 24, 1862, the Bi-centenary of the Act of Uniformity? a Plea for Truth, and Peace, and Love PDF full book. Access full book title "Black Bartholomew's Day." How Shall We Best Commemorate, on August 24, 1862, the Bi-centenary of the Act of Uniformity? a Plea for Truth, and Peace, and Love by Charles Girdlestone. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.

"Black Bartholomew's Day." How Shall We Best Commemorate, on August 24, 1862, the Bi-centenary of the Act of Uniformity? a Plea for Truth, and Peace, and Love

Author: Charles Girdlestone
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Act of Uniformity
Languages : en
Pages : 28

Book Description

"Black Bartholomew's Day." How Shall We Best Commemorate, on August 24, 1862, the Bi-centenary of the Act of Uniformity? a Plea for Truth, and Peace, and Love

Author: Charles Girdlestone
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Act of Uniformity
Languages : en
Pages : 28

Book Description

The Great Ejectment of 1662

Author: Alan P.F. Sell
Publisher: Wipf and Stock Publishers
ISBN: 1610973887
Category : Religion
Languages : en
Pages : 309

Book Description
By Bartholomew's Day, 24 August, 1662, all ministers and schoolmasters in England and Wales were required by the Act of Uniformity to have given their "unfeigned assent and consent" to the Book of Common Prayer of the Church of England. On theological grounds nearly two thousand ministers--approximately one fifth of the clergy of the Church of England--refused to comply and thereby forfeited their livings. This book has been written to commemorate the 350th Anniversary of the Great Ejectment. In Part One three early modern historians provide accounts of the antecedents and aftermath of the ejectment in England and Wales, while in Part Two the case is advanced that the negative responses of the ejected ministers to the legal requirements of the Act of Uniformity were rooted in positive doctrinal convictions that are of continuing ecumenical significance.