Author: Drury Ridgway SherrodPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Actors
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
Attribution of Causal Responsibility for Behavior in Actors and Observers
Author: Drury Ridgway SherrodPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Actors
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
Actor-observer Differences in Casual Attribution and Sanctioning Evaluation
Author: Tamara Jocelyn FergusonPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Actors
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This dissertation examined the link between causal attributions for, and sanctioning evaluations of, actors' success and failure on an interpersona1 task. In Study 1, 110 (58 males, 52 females) college students were randomly assigned to one of eight conditions of a 2 (actor vs. observer perspective) X 2 (public vs. private evaluation context) X 2 (causal attribution judgments preceded vs. followed by sanctioning assessments) factorial design, in which the outcome was always failure. In Study 2, 212 (104 males, 108 females) college students were assigned to one of 12 conditions of a 2 (actor vs. observer perspective) X 2 (success vs. failure outcome) X 3 (high vs. low vs. no task difficulty information provided) factorial design, in which the evaluation context was always public. The c1ient-therapist paradigm was used in both experiments, in which the actor counselled a presumed client, while an observer viewed the c1ient-therapist exchange. Measures of personal and situational attribution, ascriptions of credit/blame, perceptions of reward deservingness, and decision-time were included in both studies. The results of the first study showed that actors relative to observers accepted less personal causal responsibility, less blame, and recommended awarding themselves more money for failure when these evaluations were public rather than private. The opposite pattern of results was found in the private condition. The results of the first study, a pilot study, and a replication experiment {n = 28) indicated that the effects of evaluation context were not due to concerns for accuracy, cautiousness, or modesty. The replication experiment also confirmed the idea that actors and observers experience difficulty in the assuming the role of their counterpart and that observers' judgments may have been affected by how they thought actors would respond. The results of the second study replicated those found in Study 1 under public conditions. Actors, relative to observers, accepted more personal causal responsibility and credit for success than for failure. Low task difficulty information reduced the extent to which actors made self-serving assessments of their success and failure. However, actors' judgments reflected the perception that success was improbable, whereas observers' judgments reflected the perception that success was probable. Observers also evaluated actors more harshly than was expected on the basis of the provided task difficulty informat ion. Both experiments indicated strong support for the link between causal attribution and sanctioning evaluation, even within an ability-based paradigm. Observers' harsh judgments indicated a need to consider how the interpersonal vs. intrapersonal nature of the outcome affects responsivity to causally-relevant information. Responsivity to causally-relevant information may diminish the more the observed behavior implicates the well-being of another person. There is also a need to reconsider the mechanisms underlying self-serving biases in causal attribution. Self-protection concerns may be aroused only under relatively public conditions or when the actor expects to perform the task in the future. Finally, the traditional actor-observer attribution difference may more accurately reflect participants' perceptions of what other people in the situation believe than participants' private beliefs regarding causality.
Attribution
Author: Gifford WearyPublisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1461236088
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 335
Book Description
This book initially was conceived in 1986 by Weary and Harvey as a revi sion and update of their 1981 Perspectives on Attributional Processes (pub lished by Wm. C. Brown," Dubuque, Iowa). However: toe extensive nature of recent work on attributional processes and the opportunity to collabo rate with Melinda Stanley as a coauthor led to a plan to develop a more comprehensive work than the 1981 book. It definitely is an amalgam of our interests in social and clinical psychology. It represents our commitment to basic theoretical and empirical inquiry blended with the applications of ideas and methods to understanding attribution in more naturalistic set tings, and as it unfolds in the lives of different kinds of people coping with diverse problems of living. The book represents a commitment also to the breadth of approach to attribution questions epitomized by Fritz Heider's uniquely creative mind and work in pioneering the area. To us, the attribu tional approach is not a sacrosanct school of thought on the human condi tion. It is, rather, a body of ideas and findings that we find to be highly useful in our work as social (JH and GW) and clinical (GW and MS) psychology scholars. It is an inviting approach that, as we shall describe in the book, brings together ideas and work from different fields in psychology-all concerned with the pervasive and inestimab1e importance of interpretive activity in human experience and behavior.
The Effects of Actor/observer Set, Causal Information, and Behavior on Divergent Attributions
Author: Janet L. EadsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Field theory (Social psychology)
Languages : en
Pages : 160
Book Description
The Influence of Normative Expectations on Actor and Observer Attributions of Success and Failure
Author: Inger J. SagatunPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Human behavior
Languages : en
Pages : 584
Book Description
Equity and Justice in Social Behavior
Author: Jerald GreenbergPublisher: Academic Press
ISBN: 1483274128
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 519
Book Description
Equity and Justice in Social Behavior provides a critical assessment of the social psychological knowledge relevant to justice. This book illustrates how the broad concept of justice pervades the core literature of social psychology. Organized into 12 chapters, this book begins with an overview of the primary justice theories and identifies some of the focal issues with which they are concerned. This text then provides the necessary theoretical background for the study. Other chapters consider the various individual difference variables known to affect adherence to social justice norms. This book explains as well how the perceived causes of justice affect attempts to seek redress, and how actors and observers diverge in their perspectives about justice. The final chapter deals with the normative and instrumental interpretations that have been offered to explain justice behavior. This book is a valuable resource for social psychologists, social scientists, philosophers, political actors, theorists, and graduate students.
The Attribution of Blame
Author: K.G. ShaverPublisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1461250943
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 199
Book Description
How can we identify the causes of events? What does it mean to assert that someone is responsible for a moral affront? Under what circumstances should we blame others for wrongdoing? The related, but conceptually distinct, issues of causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness that are the subject of this book play a critical role in our everyday social encounters. As very young children we learn to assert that "it wasn't my fault," or that "I didn't mean to do it." Responsibility and blame follow us into adulthood, as personal or organizational failings require explanation. Although judgments of moral accountability are quickly made and adamantly defended, the process leading to those judgments is not as simple as it might seem. Psychological research on causality and responsibility has not taken complete advantage of a long tradition of philosophical analysis of these concepts. Philosophical discussions, for their part, have not been sufficiently I1ware of the psychological realities. An assignment of blame is a social explanation. It is the outcome of a process that begins with an event having negative consequences, involves judgments about causality, personal responsibility, and possible mitigation. The result can be an assertion, or a denial, of individual blameworthiness. The purpose of this book is to develop a comprehensive theory of how people assign blame.
New Directions in Attribution Research
Author: J. H. HarveyPublisher: Psychology Press
ISBN: 113491945X
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 287
Book Description
Published in 1976, New Directions in Attribution Research is a valuable contribution to the field of Social Psychology.
The Attribution of Responsibility for Illness
Author: Roxanne Marie AndrewsPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Attribution (Social psychology)
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
Author: