Assessment of Non-backfittable Concepts to Improve PWR Uranium Utilization PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Assessment of Non-backfittable Concepts to Improve PWR Uranium Utilization PDF full book. Access full book title Assessment of Non-backfittable Concepts to Improve PWR Uranium Utilization by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Seven non-backfittable improvements to light water reactors were assessed for Batelle/Pacific Northwest Laboratories in support of the Department of Energy's program on Advanced Reactor Studies. The objective was to provide industrial perspective as to which concepts have the best potential for development to improve fuel utilization. The concepts were rated against the assessment criteria while considering the key questions identified for each concept, and recommendations were made for further action on unresolved key questions. The concepts were subjectively ranked against each other in terms of relative investment potential. The ranking considered all criteria but, for example, weighted fuel utilization savings more heavily than development costs. Finally, conclusions and recommendations for future action were determined. The reference design for this study was the NASAP Composite Improved PWR.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages :
Book Description
Seven non-backfittable improvements to light water reactors were assessed for Batelle/Pacific Northwest Laboratories in support of the Department of Energy's program on Advanced Reactor Studies. The objective was to provide industrial perspective as to which concepts have the best potential for development to improve fuel utilization. The concepts were rated against the assessment criteria while considering the key questions identified for each concept, and recommendations were made for further action on unresolved key questions. The concepts were subjectively ranked against each other in terms of relative investment potential. The ranking considered all criteria but, for example, weighted fuel utilization savings more heavily than development costs. Finally, conclusions and recommendations for future action were determined. The reference design for this study was the NASAP Composite Improved PWR.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power Publisher: ISBN: Category : Nuclear reactors Languages : en Pages : 256
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Publisher: ISBN: Category : Power resources Languages : en Pages : 880
Author: 
Author: 
Author: 
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Energy and Commerce. Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power
Author: 
Author: American Nuclear Society
Author: 
Author: 
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development
Author: 
Author: United States. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Energy