Author: United States. Department of the Air ForcePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
Armed Forces Censorship
Author: United States. Department of the Air ForcePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
Armed Forces Censorship (Army)
Author: United States. Department of the ArmyPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 185
Book Description
Armed Forces Censorship
Author: United States. Department of the ArmyPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Book Description
Armed Forces Censorship, [Jan. 15, 1957].
![Armed Forces Censorship, [Jan. 15, 1957]. PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/SblxxAEACAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Wartime Press Censorship by the U.s. Armed Forces
Author: U S Army Command and General Staff CollPublisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781535288989
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
This study is an analysis of historical factors which form the basis for past U.S. wartime press censorship by the U.S. armed forces and the significance these factors have on future U.S. military operations. These factors are: the relative success of past voluntary and involuntary censorship and press restrictions, the effects of evolving technology on censorship, and the recurring debate over censorship which preceded each of our conflicts. The analysis shows an evolution of wartime press censorship from the colonial era to the Panama intervention, Operation Just Cause, and traces in depth the following conclusions: improvement in news gathering technology initially resulted in the perception that reporting from theaters of war must be formally restricted to protect operational security and America's tradition of press freedom and the "people's right to know" have now outweighed the need for formal protection of operational security. The study concludes that technology, Congressional reluctance to curb the news media, and the desire of the armed forces to inspire confidence and trust have combined to eliminate censorship organization and procedures from U.S. military planning, force structure, and capabilities.
Field Press Censorship
Author: United States. Department of the ArmyPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 88
Book Description
Stars and Stripes
Author: United States. General Accounting OfficePublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 128
Book Description
Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO investigated allegations of censorship, news management, and command influence at the Stars and Stripes newspapers. GAO found that: (1) institutional and cultural differences between the military and media made it difficult for the papers to simultaneously accomplish their missions to provide accurate, uncensored news and their military mission to provide mission-oriented material; (2) although the Department of Defense (DOD) revised its publications policy in 1984 in order to help prevent censorship, the revision actually permitted greater military influence by establishing an advisory board for each paper to be chaired by the appropriate unified command's public affairs officer, and by prohibiting investigative reporting; (3) according to a panel formed by the Society of Professional Journalists, evidence of censorship and inappropriate news management was conclusive at the Pacific Stars and Stripes, but inconclusive at the European Stars and Stripes; (4) allegations at the Pacific paper concerned attempts by military officials to influence reporting on subjects sensitive to host countries, attempts to influence Stars and Stripes personnel actions, and military unresponsiveness to reporters' inquiries; (5) most of the allegations in Europe involved external influence by commanders and their public affairs officers, who caused stories to be withheld or delayed, or were unresponsive; and (6) although 47 percent of the wire services' stories on DOD were negative, only 35 percent of the wire services' DOD stories published in the European paper were negative, and only 27 percent were negative in the Pacific paper.
Armed Forces Censorship
Author: United States. Navy DepartmentPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 10
Book Description
Armed Forces Censorship. [Issued jointly by the Departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force.]
![Armed Forces Censorship. [Issued jointly by the Departments of the Army, Navy and Air Force.] PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/9wPHMgEACAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: United States. Department of the ArmyPublisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 58
Book Description
Civil Censorship
Author: United States. Department of the ArmyPublisher:
ISBN:
Category : Censorship
Languages : en
Pages : 58
Book Description