ARL Insights From the Battle Command Re-engineering III Concept Experimentation Program PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download ARL Insights From the Battle Command Re-engineering III Concept Experimentation Program PDF full book. Access full book title ARL Insights From the Battle Command Re-engineering III Concept Experimentation Program by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 71
Book Description
The Mounted Maneuver Battle Laboratory at Fort Knox, Kentucky, conducted the third battle command re-engineering experiment (BCR III), during the period of April 12 to April 30, 1999. This report describes the research efforts of the Human Research and Engineering (HRED) of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) in support of BCR III. This research is a key element of the ARL 5-year science and technology objective (STO) IV. G.10: cognitive engineering of the digitized battlefield. For BCR III, ARL's efforts were centered on the virtual exercise in which a model future strike force variant organization with modular semi-automated forces (ModSAF)-based displays and advanced combat systems, performed battle command operations in order to gain a more robust understanding of the potential offered by these technological and organizational capabilities. Within the framework of the BCR III overarching issues, ARL's focal point was associated with the sub-issue question: What is the impact of situational awareness certainty and its cognitive effect on decision making, information request, and staff dynamics? This report cites the findings from the application of two ARL cognitive engineering-based research instruments, as well as observation-based insights and commanders' comments recorded during a focus group session held by ARL following the final after-action review. The two ARL instruments, the decision maker self-report profile (DMSRP) and the commander-centered decision environment inventory (C2DEI) focused on the various cognitive processes and environmental complexities associated with battle command decision making experienced during BCR III.
Author: Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 71
Book Description
The Mounted Maneuver Battle Laboratory at Fort Knox, Kentucky, conducted the third battle command re-engineering experiment (BCR III), during the period of April 12 to April 30, 1999. This report describes the research efforts of the Human Research and Engineering (HRED) of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) in support of BCR III. This research is a key element of the ARL 5-year science and technology objective (STO) IV. G.10: cognitive engineering of the digitized battlefield. For BCR III, ARL's efforts were centered on the virtual exercise in which a model future strike force variant organization with modular semi-automated forces (ModSAF)-based displays and advanced combat systems, performed battle command operations in order to gain a more robust understanding of the potential offered by these technological and organizational capabilities. Within the framework of the BCR III overarching issues, ARL's focal point was associated with the sub-issue question: What is the impact of situational awareness certainty and its cognitive effect on decision making, information request, and staff dynamics? This report cites the findings from the application of two ARL cognitive engineering-based research instruments, as well as observation-based insights and commanders' comments recorded during a focus group session held by ARL following the final after-action review. The two ARL instruments, the decision maker self-report profile (DMSRP) and the commander-centered decision environment inventory (C2DEI) focused on the various cognitive processes and environmental complexities associated with battle command decision making experienced during BCR III.
Author: Michael G. Golden Publisher: ISBN: 9781423552291 Category : Languages : en Pages : 71
Book Description
The Mounted Maneuver Battle Laboratory at Fort Knox, Kentucky, conducted the third battle command re-engineering experiment (BCR III), during the period of April 12 to April 30, 1999. This report describes the research efforts of the Human Research and Engineering (HRED) of the U.S. Army Research Laboratory (ARL) in support of BCR III. This research is a key element of the ARL 5-year science and technology objective (STO) IV.G.10: cognitive engineering of the digitized battlefield. For BCR III, ARL's efforts were centered on the virtual exercise in which a model future strike force variant organization with modular semi-automated forces (ModSAF)-based displays and advanced combat systems, performed battle command operations in order to gain a more robust understanding of the potential offered by these technological and organizational capabilities. Within the framework of the BCR III overarching issues, ARL's focal point was associated with the sub-issue question: What is the impact of situational awareness certainty and its cognitive effect on decision making, information request, and staff dynamics? This report cites the findings from the application of two ARL cognitive engineering-based research instruments, as well as observation-based insights and commanders' comments recorded during a focus group session held by ARL following the final after-action review. The two ARL instruments, the decision maker self-report profile (DMSRP) and the commander- centered decision environment inventory (C2DEI) focused on the various cognitive processes and environmental complexities associated with battle command decision making experienced during BCR III.
Author: Carl W. Lickteig Publisher: ISBN: 9781423554646 Category : Command and control systems Languages : en Pages : 78
Book Description
This report describes a concept experimentation assessment of battle command information requirements and military decision making in the 2010-2015 timeframe. This research was the first in a series of concept experimentation programs (CEPs) planned by the Mounted Battlespace Battle Lab (MBBL) at Fort Knox, KY, to re-engineer command and staff operations. This report focuses on research methods, exploratory results, and recommendations on method improvements for assessing battle command information requirements and the military decision making process (MDMP). The exploratory results provide a benchmark for future efforts and suggestions for improving information systems and future evaluations. Limitations and lessons learned on research methods are considered. Method recommendations address measurement approach issues, such as mission, enemy, terrain, troops, and time (METT-T) structure for determining information requirements, and the applicability of the MDMP in a real-time information environment. Recommendations on manual measures address the timing and scope of assessment and respondent workload. Finally, recommendations on instrumented measures stress reducing respondent workload and increasing measurement scope and precision.
Author: May H. Throne Publisher: ISBN: 9781423533962 Category : Languages : en Pages : 107
Book Description
This report examines the use of digital information systems and automated measures of human performance to improve staff training and performance assessment. This work began with a review of research literature and technical documentation related to team performance and assessment, operations in digital environments, and automated performance data collection. A general design for staff performance assessment was formulated, based on findings of the literature review. An opportunity to implement this design was provided by an Army Concept Experimentation Program (CEP), the Battle Command Reengineering (BCR) IV, which took place in April 2000. By participating in the BCR IV, researchers had the opportunity to conduct a trial implementation of the automated measures of performance assessment Coordination between the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Mounted Maneuver Battlespace Lab (MMBL) at Fort Knox, Kentucky, enabled the two organizations to work together as a team to accomplish multiple goals. This report describes the development of prototype automated measures, the results of their use during the BCR IV, and lessons learned for future staff performance assessment efforts.
Author: May H. Throne Publisher: ISBN: Category : Military planning Languages : en Pages : 114
Book Description
"This report examines the use of digital information systems and automated measures of human performance to improve staff training and performance assessment. This work began with a review of research literature and technical documentation related to team performance and assessment, operations in digital environments, and automated performance data collection. A general design for staff performance assessment was formulated, based on findings of the literature review. An opportunity to implement this design was provided by an Army Concept Experimentation Program (CEP), the Battle Command Reengineering (BCR) IV, which took place in April 2000. By participating in the BCR IV, researchers had the opportunity to conduct a trial implementation of the automated measures of performance assessment Coordination between the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences and the Mounted Maneuver Battlespace Lab (MMBL) at Fort Knox, Kentucky, enabled the two organizations to work together as a team to accomplish multiple goals. This report describes the development of prototype automated measures, the results of their use during the BCR IV, and lessons learned for future staff performance assessment efforts."--Stinet.
Author: National Research Council Publisher: National Academies Press ISBN: 0309165598 Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 254
Book Description
The Department of Defense is in the process of transforming the nation's armed forces to meet the military challenges of the 21st century. Currently, the opportunity exists to carry out experiments at individual and joint service levels to facilitate this transformation. Experimentation, which involves a spectrum of activities including analyses, war games, modeling and simulation, small focused experiments, and large field events among other things, provides the means to enhance naval and joint force development. To assist the Navy in this effort, the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) asked the National Research Council (NRC) to conduct a study to examine the role of experimentation in building future naval forces to operate in the joint environment. The NRC formed the Committee for the Role of Experimentation in Building Future Naval Forces to perform the study.
Author: Carl W. Lickteig Publisher: ISBN: Category : Technology & Engineering Languages : en Pages : 110
Book Description
The Army's growing reliance on digital technologies reinforces and extends concerns about training and evaluation, particularly in the area of command and control. Digital technology represents a new and powerful weapon for attacking evaluation requirements, but is a double-edged sword that poses challenge and opportunity. This report examines bow digital technologies can help solve many evaluation challenges, including the ones they create. The Background chapter reviews basic issues confronting conventional command and control performance and evaluation. Two key issues considered are manually burdened methods and measures, and the limitations imposed by analog media. The Findings chapter examines bow digital technologies might improve evaluations of command and control performance. This examination begins by identifying many of the new challenges introduced by digital command and control systems. Next, opportunities for overcoming evaluation challenges through the application of digital technologies are considered, including automated measures of versus about performance, more precise and comprehensive measures, and less burdened measurement methods. Finally, examples of digital measurement methods illustrate the potential for improving command and control evaluation through digital data integration, data mining, and data visualization. The report's conclusions identify some key research and development efforts required for applying digital technology to improve command and control performance and evaluation.
Author: 
Author: 
Author: Michael G. Golden
Author: Carl W. Lickteig
Author: 
Author: May H. Throne
Author: May H. Throne
Author: National Research Council
Author: Carl W. Lickteig
Author: 
Author: