Analysis of Some Aspects of the Air Force Position Evaluation System PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Analysis of Some Aspects of the Air Force Position Evaluation System PDF full book. Access full book title Analysis of Some Aspects of the Air Force Position Evaluation System by Francis D. Harding. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Francis D. Harding Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: Francis D. Harding Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: Francis D. Harding Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 9
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 72
Book Description
"This report summarizes the history of job evaluation and gives a critical review of the technical literature as a background for the Air Force job evaluation plan. The Air Force plan is described with the rationale for each phase. A discussion of unsolved problems includes an outline of research needed to discover solutions of these problems. An Appendix lists a 200-item bibliography with abstracts." -- page iii.
Author: Harold W. Schmid (Jr.) Publisher: ISBN: Category : Languages : en Pages : 51
Book Description
Although the present Officer Evaluation Reporting System has served the US Air Force for the past decade as an efficient management tool, experience with the US Army's system has shown that the Air Force system may need some major revision. This paper attempts to compare the current Air Force and Army appraisal systems and analyze the advantages and disadvantages to the Air Force in adopting major changes to the way it evaluates the performance of its officers. It begins with a review of various appraisal systems and the need for such a system in identifying our best leaders. Next the current appraisal system is reviewed in light of the role each member in the chain of command plays in the evaluation process. Certain mechanical and administrative processes are explored in an attempt to design a system which is objective, efficient, and easily administered. The paper ends with some recommended changes to the current Air Force system and a discussion of acceptability of those changes by Air Force officers. (SDW).
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 20
Book Description
This report is one of a series dealing with rater bias in job evaluation. It was found that the more familiar the rater is with the job being evaluated, the higher his rating is likely to be. This effect was observed for five of the 14 job evaluation rating factors used: Adaptability, Decision-making, Managerial and Supervisory, Mental Work, and Working Conditions. Methods are suggested for controlling the familiarity effect in the Air Force job evaluation system.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 28
Book Description
Four job evaluation factors were used as the basis of rating 10 Air Force specialties. For each factor three different methods were used in constructing the scale: (1) each scale division was defined and illustrated; (2) neither scale division definitions nor examples were used; and (3) definitions were used but the examples were omitted. Ratings by samples of aviation cadets were analyzed for effects of method on mean ratings. For three of the four factors, the mean ratings obtained were not different as a function of the method of scale construction. Methods 1 and 3 were about equally reliable, both yielding more reliable means than method 2. Method 3 is suggested as being the most effective because the task of the rater is somewhat simpler than for method 1 and the reliability is higher than for method 2.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
To determine how the reliability of ratings is affected by fractionating a multidimensional rating factor, the complex job-evaluation factor, Knowledge, was split into four simpler factors: Formal Education, Special Education, On-the-Job Training, and Work Experience. Aviation cadets' ratings of 42 Air Force specialties on these four factors were somewhat more reliable than ratings on the original multidimensional Knowledge factor. Maximum reliability of rater judgments is suggested as one criterion for the most desirable level of fractionation of a complex factor.
Author: Francis D. Harding
Author: Francis D. Harding
Author: Francis D. Harding
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Harold W. Schmid (Jr.)
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Raymond E. Christal
Author: Joshua Palochak
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division