Analysis of Some Aspects of the Air Force Position Evaluation System PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Analysis of Some Aspects of the Air Force Position Evaluation System PDF full book. Access full book title Analysis of Some Aspects of the Air Force Position Evaluation System by Francis D. Harding. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Francis D. Harding Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: Francis D. Harding Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: Francis D. Harding Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 16
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Publisher: National Academies Press ISBN: 0309678684 Category : Business & Economics Languages : en Pages : 289
Book Description
The USAir Force human capital management (HCM) system is not easily defined or mapped. It affects virtually every part of the Air Force because workforce policies, procedures, and processes impact all offices and organizations that include Airmen and responsibilities and relationships change regularly. To ensure the readiness of Airmen to fulfill the mission of the Air Force, strategic approaches are developed and issued through guidance and actions of the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services and the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs. Strengthening US Air Force Human Capital Management assesses and strengthens the various U.S. Air Force initiatives and programs working to improve person-job match and human capital management in coordinated support of optimal mission capability. This report considers the opportunities and challenges associated with related interests and needs across the USAF HCM system as a whole, and makes recommendations to inform improvements to USAF personnel selection and classification and other critical system components across career trajectories. Strengthening US Air Force Human Capital Management offers the Air Force a strategic approach, across a connected HCM system, to develop 21st century human capital capabilities essential for the success of 21st century Airmen.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 18
Book Description
To determine how the reliability of ratings is affected by fractionating a multidimensional rating factor, the complex job-evaluation factor, Knowledge, was split into four simpler factors: Formal Education, Special Education, On-the-Job Training, and Work Experience. Aviation cadets' ratings of 42 Air Force specialties on these four factors were somewhat more reliable than ratings on the original multidimensional Knowledge factor. Maximum reliability of rater judgments is suggested as one criterion for the most desirable level of fractionation of a complex factor.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 24
Book Description
Four job evaluation factors were used as the basis of rating 10 Air Force specialties. For each factor three different methods were used in constructing the scale: (1) each scale division was defined and illustrated; (2) neither scale division definitions nor examples were used; and (3) definitions were used but the examples were omitted. Ratings by samples of aviation cadets were analyzed for effects of method on mean ratings. For three of the four factors, the mean ratings obtained were not different as a function of the method of scale construction. Methods 1 and 3 were about equally reliable, both yielding more reliable means than method 2. Method 3 is suggested as being the most effective because the task of the rater is somewhat simpler than for method 1 and the reliability is higher than for method 2.
Author: Joseph M. Madden Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job analysis Languages : en Pages : 72
Book Description
"This report summarizes the history of job evaluation and gives a critical review of the technical literature as a background for the Air Force job evaluation plan. The Air Force plan is described with the rationale for each phase. A discussion of unsolved problems includes an outline of research needed to discover solutions of these problems. An Appendix lists a 200-item bibliography with abstracts." -- page iii.
Author: Raymond E. Christal Publisher: ISBN: Category : Job evaluation Languages : en Pages : 36
Book Description
Reliabilities of single ratings and pooled ratings of Air Force job evaluation factors were estimated from ratings on 50 Air Force specialties by student officers attending the Command and Staff School. The Spearman-Brown prophecy formula was found to produce reliability estimates which were practically identical to those obtained by randomly drawing samples and computing the reliability for each one. The inter-rater and rate-rerate reliability of the Air Force job evaluation system was found to be adequate when the composites were based upon an average of the ratings made by 10 to 15 officers at the USAF Command and Staff School. The reliability of such mean ratings did not rise appreciably as the number of raters was increased beyond 20. When the basis of rating was a full-length job description, the raters tended to assign higher values than when they based their ratings on a brief Specialty Summary. However, the rank ordering of the specialties remained essentially unchanged. Reliability of the ratings was approximately the same whether long or short job descriptions were used.
Author: Francis D. Harding
Author: Francis D. Harding
Author: Francis D. Harding
Author: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Author: United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division
Author: United States. Air Force. Systems Command. Aeronautical Systems Division
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Raymond E. Christal
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Author: Raymond E. Christal