An Examination of NCAA Division I-A Football Program Success and Student-Athlete Graduation Rates PDF Download

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
The purpose of this study was to determine if NCAA Division I-A football program success had a relationship to student-athlete graduation rates. Graduation rate data for 2001 were obtained from the NCAA and cumulative five-year records of selected NCAA Division I-A football programs determined winning percentage for the years 1996-2000. The data were examined by correlating the two variables of winning percentage and graduation rate. The findings show no significant correlation at a probability level of .05. The results of this study indicate the success of a football programs do not have any relationship to low football team graduation rates. Therefore, other factors such as athletic department ideals, commercialization of sport, or the preconceived notion that collegiate football athletes are only enrolled to compete in football may play a factor in graduation rates among NCAA Division I-A football players.

Author: Harold Craw
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
The purpose of this study was to determine if NCAA Division I-A football program success had a relationship to student-athlete graduation rates. Graduation rate data for 2001 were obtained from the NCAA and cumulative five-year records of selected NCAA Division I-A football programs determined winning percentage for the years 1996-2000. The data were examined by correlating the two variables of winning percentage and graduation rate. The findings show no significant correlation at a probability level of .05. The results of this study indicate the success of a football programs do not have any relationship to low football team graduation rates. Therefore, other factors such as athletic department ideals, commercialization of sport, or the preconceived notion that collegiate football athletes are only enrolled to compete in football may play a factor in graduation rates among NCAA Division I-A football players.

Author: Donna L. Domikaitis Matthews
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

View

Book Description
The results of this study provided support for the ongoing use of the NCAA Academic Performance Program (APP) in promoting the academic success and persistence of NCAA Division I FBS college student-athletes. Recommendations were made for NCAA policy changes that might further improve the GSR of Division I FBS college student-athletes and for further research that examines and evaluates the connections between all the perceived problems of college athletics in a sociological and comprehensive context.

Author: Melanie Miller
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 246

View

Book Description

Author: Arthur A. Fleisher
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
ISBN: 0226253260
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 208

View

Book Description
Intercollegiate sports is an enterprise that annually grosses over $1 billion in income. Some schools may receive more than $20 million from athletic programs, perhaps as much as $10 million simply from the sale of football tickets. Drawing on nontechnical economic data, the authors present a persuasive case that the premier sports organization of colleges and universities in the United States--the NCAA--is a cartel, its members engaged in classically defined restrictive practices for the sole purpose of jointly maximizing their profits. This fresh perspective on the NCAA offers explanations of why illicit payments to athletes persist, why non-NCAA organizations have not flourished, and why members have readily agreed on certain suspect rules. Tracing the historical development of this institutional behavior, the authors argue that the major football powers in the early 1950s were able to gain control of the internal processes of NCAA enforcement. Over time--as other schools' teams improved and began to win on the playing field--the more powerful institutions applied pressure to bring the newcomers under NCAA investigation and, ultimately, to place them on probation. By carefully managing NCAA enforcement regulations, major schools blunted the threat to their continued growth presented by other teams. Offering a valuable case study for sports analysts and students of economics and cartel behavior, this book is a revealing glimpse inside the embattled NCAA.

Author: National Collegiate Athletic Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 10

View

Book Description
Data is presented on: (1) Comparison of GSR and Federal Graduation Rate Cohorts (1999-2002 Entering Classes); (2) Average GSRs for Division I Student-Athletes in 1998-01 Cohorts Vs. 1999-2002 Cohorts; (3) Graduation Success Rate Trends for Division I Men's Sports: Four-Class Averages for 1998-01 Cohorts vs. 1999-02 Cohorts; (4) Graduation Success Rate Trends for Division I Women's Sports: Four-Class Averages for 1998-01 Cohorts vs. 1999-02 Cohorts; (5) Graduation Success Rate Trends for Division I Men's Sports: 1995 to 2002 Entering Cohorts; (6) Graduation Success Rate Trends for Division I Women's Sports: 1995 to 2002 Entering Cohorts; (7) Graduation Success Rates of All Student-Athletes at Division I Institutions; (8) Graduation Success Rates of All Student-Athletes at Division I Institutions by Gender; (9) Graduation Success Rates of All Student-Athletes Division I Institutions by Ethnicity; (10) Eight-Year Trends in GSR for Division I Men's Basketball and Baseball, and FBS Football: 1995-2002; (11) Eight--Year Trends in GSR for Division I Women's Basketball, Softball and Volleyball 1995-2002; (12) Federal Graduation Rate Trends for Division I Men's Sports: Four-Class Averages for 1998-01 Cohorts vs. 1999-02 Cohorts; (13) Federal Graduation Rate Trends for Division I Women's Sports: Four-Class Averages for 1998-01 Cohorts vs. 1999-02 Cohorts; (14) Federal Graduation Rate Trends for Division I Men's Sports 1995 to 2002 Entering Cohorts; (15) Federal Graduation Rate Trends for Division I Women's Sports: 1995 to 2002 Entering Cohorts; and (16) Eight-Year Trends in Federal Rate and GSR for Student Body and Student-Athletes in Division I: 1995-2002.

Author: Mary C. Willingham
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 38

View

Book Description
"Since its inception, collegiate football has had low retention and graduation rates for student-athletes. While admission standards are on the rise at major public universities, many under-prepared student-athletes (football) are admitted each year because they are the 'best' player in the state/country, creating academic disparities. The history, culture and economic success of the university athletic program, especially football, plays a pivotal role in explaining these disparities. The data collected and recorded over the past two decades will demonstrate that there is a growing disparity in the academic preparedness between college students and college student-athletes (football) at 31 Division I (DI) institutions. The GPA (grade point average), SAT (Scholastic Achievement Test) scores, and graduation rates, however, do not accurately measure these discrepancies. The academic deficits of the special admit student-athlete can only be assessed through performance-based measurements of reading, writing and math. Ideally, these assessments should be done much earlier in the education process so that remediation can take place before entering college. Despite the academic support and resources available to special admit student athletes, it is not possible to remediate and take college level degree applicable courses at the same time. The graduation rate of DI football players (50%, 2009) can be explained, then, by the low admission standards that suggest a lack of proficiency in basic academic skills."--Abstract from author supplied metadata.

Author: Zachary Thomas Carlisle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College athletes
Languages : en
Pages : 0

View

Book Description
Recent attempts by members of the Northwestern University football team to form a union in 2015 necessitates the need to study the hypothesized relationship between NCAA athletic revenues and student-athlete graduation rates. Using a Marxist conceptual framework, OLS regression models were constructed to examine the proposed relationship between athletic revenue and student-athlete graduation rates, while controlling a number of relevant independent variables. Although athletic revenue was not found to be as significant of a graduation rate predictor as was hypothesized, the geographic reign of a university was found to be a significant predictor of student-athlete graduation rates, as well as the denotation of a university as either public or private.

Author: Joshua Castle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College athletes
Languages : en
Pages : 206

View

Book Description
In 2004, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) adopted legislation that it hoped would help increase the graduation rates of student athletes. The Academic Progress Rating (APR), was designed to hold each individual athletic program accountable for keeping student athletes eligible and at the institution until the student athlete graduates. With this reform the NCAA attached land mark discipline measures for non compliance of the APR standards. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact that the APR has had on NCAA college football programs. Specifically, this study focused on assessing coaches' and directors of football operations' (DFOs) responses to questions regarding the issues of contention by football coaches and DFOs that lie within the APR legislation and how this legislation has changed their recruiting and retention strategies. The 234 DFOs and coaches that serve in that position at NCAA Division I institutions were chosen as subjects for this study. They were asked to complete a survey containing questions about how the APR has changed their program's recruiting and retention strategy. In addition, they were asked how the APR has affected their program's graduation rate, amount of resources they and their athletic department have dedicated to academics, and the amount of transfers they have coming into and leaving their program, due to the APR. These responses were then analyzed to see if there were any differences among BCS automatic bid conferences and non-BCS automatic bid conferences. The results indicated that there was no significant difference between BCS and non-BCS programs in terms of retention and recruiting strategies due to the APR legislation. However, results did indicate that 45.6% of Division I college football programs changed their recruiting strategy. Of the respondents, 56.3% are slightly less, less, or extremely less likely to recruit prospects that are potential discipline problems. In addition, 64.1% of football programs were slightly less, less, or extremely less likely to recruit academically challenged prospects. While 45.7% of programs said they were slightly less, less or extremely less likely to recruit special admittance prospects. In terms of retention, 48.6% of football programs indicated that they were slightly more, more, or extremely more likely to retain discipline problems due to the APR. When faced with a student athlete that has convicted a misdemeanor, 17.5% of football programs responded they were slightly more likely or more likely to retain the student athlete. Other results from this survey showed that 66% of football programs and 75.7% of athletic departments have increased either money or resources to their academic budgets because of the APR legislation. Responses also implied that 61.1% of football programs were slightly more likely, more, or were extremely more likely to monitor class attendance due to the APR legislation. The results also indicated that 83.5% of football programs feel they have graduated more student athletes since the inception of the APR. Additionally, 28.2% of football programs stated that they have more student athletes transferring out of their program than into the program.

Author: Morris R. Council
Publisher: IAP
ISBN: 164113416X
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 127

View

Book Description
There are numerous books documenting the challenges of student athletes and presenting recommendations for academic success. They primarily focus on understanding the issues of student-athletes and recommendations are oftentimes overly simplistic, failing to explicitly provide interventions that can be executed by student-athlete support personnel. In addition, the topic of supporting student-athletes who are academically at risk and/or are diagnosed with high incidence disabilities has been overlooked by scholars resulting in few publications specifically focusing on providing strategies to the staff/personnel who serve these populations. The general target audience is college/university practitioners who interface with student-athletes who demonstrate academic and social risk in the realm of athletics. These stakeholders include but are not limited to: academic support staff, student athletes, parents, coaches, faculty/educators, counselors, psychologists, higher education administrators, student affairs professionals, disability services coordinators/personnel, as well as researchers who focus on education leadership, sports, and special education. All of these groups are likely to find this book attractive especially as they work with student-athletes who are at-risk for academic failure. Also, it is ventured that this book will become the staple text for the National Association of Academic Advisors (N4A), the official organization for all personnel who work in collegiate academic support and can be used by members of intercollegiate athletic associations to reform policies in place to support at-risk student-athletes.