Author: Paul Padde
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 394
Book Description
An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Supervisory Techniques and Organizational Outcomes Among the Supervisors in the Agricultural Extension Service in the Eastern Region Districts of Uganda
Summary of Research in Extension
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agricultural extension work
Languages : en
Pages : 190
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Agricultural extension work
Languages : en
Pages : 190
Book Description
Resources in Education
Dissertation Abstracts International
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 580
Book Description
Abstracts of dissertations available on microfilm or as xerographic reproductions.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 580
Book Description
Abstracts of dissertations available on microfilm or as xerographic reproductions.
Resources in Education
American Doctoral Dissertations
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertation abstracts
Languages : en
Pages : 796
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertation abstracts
Languages : en
Pages : 796
Book Description
Effective Supervisory Relationships
Author: Helen Beinart
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1118973607
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Effective Supervisory Relationships: Best Evidence and Practice is the first book to explore in detail the Supervisory Relationship, which research has consistently found to be the most critical component of any supervisory process. Helen Beinart and Sue Clohessy – two experts in the field – draw on world-wide studies that cover all major therapeutic approaches to the Supervisory Relationship, and include detailed coverage of cultural competence and issues of effective multicultural supervision. The result is a comprehensive resource that offers cutting-edge, internationally relevant information in order to inform study, training, continuing professional development and practice.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1118973607
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 232
Book Description
Effective Supervisory Relationships: Best Evidence and Practice is the first book to explore in detail the Supervisory Relationship, which research has consistently found to be the most critical component of any supervisory process. Helen Beinart and Sue Clohessy – two experts in the field – draw on world-wide studies that cover all major therapeutic approaches to the Supervisory Relationship, and include detailed coverage of cultural competence and issues of effective multicultural supervision. The result is a comprehensive resource that offers cutting-edge, internationally relevant information in order to inform study, training, continuing professional development and practice.
Agrindex
The Relationships Among Supervisory Alliance, Style, and Supervisory Tools, and Client Goal Attainment in Social Work Field Supervision
Author: Dorothy Daly Van Dam
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Social service
Languages : en
Pages : 105
Book Description
The relationship between client goal attainment and social work field supervision has been a neglected area of empirical study in social work. Multiple studies have found the supervisory relationship to be a predictor of student satisfaction (Bogo, 1993; Fortune & Abramson, 1993). However, there are gaps in knowledge and lack of empirical evidence on the impact of this relationship on client outcomes and about how and to what extent field supervision affects client outcomes. This study attempts to close the gap. In light of the growing importance and attention to evidence-based social work practice, attention to evidence-based field supervision is important also. The study attempts to provide a rationale for three dimensions of the supervisory relationship: alliance, style, and tools used in supervision that is grounded in research evidence. It provides a model for future research on the relationship between field supervision and client outcomes. Data was analyzed using Bivariate Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis. Bivariate Correlation revealed that there were significant correlations among some of the independent variables. The scores of the supervisors and students on alliance suggested collaborative and mutual understanding of the goals of their work, the tasks undertaken to reach the goals, and relational bonds considered essential for the completion of goals and tasks. The scores of the students on alliance and those of the supervisors on tools suggested that there is a strong relationship between the students' alliances with their supervisors and the tools used in supervision. The Multiple Regression Analysis revealed that the model was not significant suggesting no significant linear relationship between the client goal attainment and supervisor and student congruence on alliance, style, and tools. There is a vast need for more research to understand this relationship to contribute to evidence-based supervisory practice to strengthen this aspect of the social work profession. The findings of this study will help inform social workers on aspects of the relationship that may increase student learning and competence in order to increase client goal attainment.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Social service
Languages : en
Pages : 105
Book Description
The relationship between client goal attainment and social work field supervision has been a neglected area of empirical study in social work. Multiple studies have found the supervisory relationship to be a predictor of student satisfaction (Bogo, 1993; Fortune & Abramson, 1993). However, there are gaps in knowledge and lack of empirical evidence on the impact of this relationship on client outcomes and about how and to what extent field supervision affects client outcomes. This study attempts to close the gap. In light of the growing importance and attention to evidence-based social work practice, attention to evidence-based field supervision is important also. The study attempts to provide a rationale for three dimensions of the supervisory relationship: alliance, style, and tools used in supervision that is grounded in research evidence. It provides a model for future research on the relationship between field supervision and client outcomes. Data was analyzed using Bivariate Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis. Bivariate Correlation revealed that there were significant correlations among some of the independent variables. The scores of the supervisors and students on alliance suggested collaborative and mutual understanding of the goals of their work, the tasks undertaken to reach the goals, and relational bonds considered essential for the completion of goals and tasks. The scores of the students on alliance and those of the supervisors on tools suggested that there is a strong relationship between the students' alliances with their supervisors and the tools used in supervision. The Multiple Regression Analysis revealed that the model was not significant suggesting no significant linear relationship between the client goal attainment and supervisor and student congruence on alliance, style, and tools. There is a vast need for more research to understand this relationship to contribute to evidence-based supervisory practice to strengthen this aspect of the social work profession. The findings of this study will help inform social workers on aspects of the relationship that may increase student learning and competence in order to increase client goal attainment.
Correlations Between Supervisory Relationships and Effectiveness
Author: Patricia F. Stewart-Hopkins
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Book Description
This descriptive quantitative study explored the relationship of supervisory effectiveness and supervisory working alliance as rated by supervisor and supervisee. These constructs were assessed by two self report measures: Supervisory Working Alliance Inventory (SWAI) and The Supervision: Adherence and Guidance Evaluation (SAGE). SWAI was used to gather information on the perceptions of the supervisor and supervisee actions of each other, how this affects the relationship, and the supervisee's interaction with clients. The SAGE was utilized to allow for measurement of the facilitating effect the supervisor has on the learner as demonstrated by use of a range of supervisory techniques that are known to be effective. The selection of these measures answers a call from the literature to examine the supervisory process using multiple, methodologically sound measures. A convenience sample of 42 counseling students and supervisors was drawn from students and supervisors at a CACREP accredited university in the Midwest. Participants had the option of completing the questionnaire in the classroom or at their discretion using the internet data collection service Survey Monkey. Several important correlations were examined using a Pearson's correlation coefficient: (a) between supervisee and supervisory perceived working alliance and effectiveness, (b) between supervisees perceived working alliance and effectiveness, and (c) between supervisors perceived working alliance and effectiveness. Positive correlations between working alliance and effectiveness ratings for supervision dyads were anticipated and supported. There was a strong, positive correlation between relationship and effectiveness ratings for supervisors and supervisees, r = .765, p = .01 for supervisee reports and r = .699, p = .001. Internal consistency for these measures was also supported by Cronbach's Alpha analysis. Correlations between supervisor and supervisee reports were anticipated but did not approach significance in this sample. Mean scores for the supervisor group were lower than the supervisee group for working alliance and effectiveness. Supervisor ratings on the SAGE are reflective of a significant difference (p
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Book Description
This descriptive quantitative study explored the relationship of supervisory effectiveness and supervisory working alliance as rated by supervisor and supervisee. These constructs were assessed by two self report measures: Supervisory Working Alliance Inventory (SWAI) and The Supervision: Adherence and Guidance Evaluation (SAGE). SWAI was used to gather information on the perceptions of the supervisor and supervisee actions of each other, how this affects the relationship, and the supervisee's interaction with clients. The SAGE was utilized to allow for measurement of the facilitating effect the supervisor has on the learner as demonstrated by use of a range of supervisory techniques that are known to be effective. The selection of these measures answers a call from the literature to examine the supervisory process using multiple, methodologically sound measures. A convenience sample of 42 counseling students and supervisors was drawn from students and supervisors at a CACREP accredited university in the Midwest. Participants had the option of completing the questionnaire in the classroom or at their discretion using the internet data collection service Survey Monkey. Several important correlations were examined using a Pearson's correlation coefficient: (a) between supervisee and supervisory perceived working alliance and effectiveness, (b) between supervisees perceived working alliance and effectiveness, and (c) between supervisors perceived working alliance and effectiveness. Positive correlations between working alliance and effectiveness ratings for supervision dyads were anticipated and supported. There was a strong, positive correlation between relationship and effectiveness ratings for supervisors and supervisees, r = .765, p = .01 for supervisee reports and r = .699, p = .001. Internal consistency for these measures was also supported by Cronbach's Alpha analysis. Correlations between supervisor and supervisee reports were anticipated but did not approach significance in this sample. Mean scores for the supervisor group were lower than the supervisee group for working alliance and effectiveness. Supervisor ratings on the SAGE are reflective of a significant difference (p